Rubus, 2021

Beek, Abraham Van De, 2021, Rubi Capenses: a further contribution to the knowledge of the genus Rubus (Rosaceae) in South Africa, Phytotaxa 515 (1), pp. 1-71 : 31

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.515.1.1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8067195

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DE3646-FF91-FFC3-FF43-FBC3FA95FA37

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Rubus
status

ser. nov.

Series Scleri A.Beek ser. nov.

Type:— Rubus mundtii Chamisso & Schlechtendal (1827: 18) View in CoL

Diagnosis: —Stem rigid, erect to arching; leaves abaxially grey or white tomentose; inflorescences often small, rigid.

Notes: — Chamisso & Schlechtendal (1827) described two Rubus species from the samples that were collected by Mundt and Maire in the Cape, R. chrysocarpus and R. mundtii . Ecklon and Zeyher distributed specimens under these names, and Drège (1843), following E. Meyer (in sched.), lumped these as ‘ R. discolor Meyer’, a name that is not only a later homonym of R. discolor Weihe & Nees [1824: 30 ; = R. ulmifolius Schott (1818: 42) ], but also an invalidly published nomen nudum. Later authors lumped both with R. rigidus .

The extant specimens belong to a group of discolorous brambles with rigid stems, usually rather small leaves, and often small inflorescences. These are well distinguished from members of Rubus ser. Rigidi with their mounding or scrambling primocanes and larger inflorescences, and therefore they are described as a separate series.

Kingdom

Plantae

Phylum

Tracheophyta

Class

Magnoliopsida

Order

Rosales

Family

Rosaceae

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF