Thuja, C.Linnaeus, 1753
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.37520/fi.2022.007 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DE6965-FF80-ED2D-849E-FC22FE1EF799 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Thuja |
status |
|
“ Thuja View in CoL View at ENA ” saviana (C.T.GAUDIN) C.T. GAUDIN, 1859
Text-fig. 5a View Text-fig , Pl. 1, Figs 8, 9
M a t e r i a l. Two leafy shoots from GLAz (MGPTPU141007, MGPT-PU141008), one from GLA20 (MGPTPU141093) and another from GLA30 (MGPT-PU141094).
D e s c r i p t i o n. Plagiotropic leafy shoots with dimorphic decussate scale leaves, with broad facial leaves and lateral ones usually not touching each other at the base.
R e m a r k s. The shoots seem to be identical to the Miocene shoots from central Italy on which Gaudin and Strozzi (1859) based their fossil-species Thuja saviana . However, the general picture is complicated by the association of such shoots in the type locality ( Gaudin and Strozzi 1859: pl. 1), and in a Spanish site ( Barron and Diéguez 2001) with cones that may belong to Calocedrus . Therefore, it is suspected but not proved, that the type of T. saviana may belong to Calocedrus (see also Kvaček et al. 2020 for the fossil record in Europe), a hypothesis further supported by the fact that cones with diagnostic characters for Thuja have never been reported for the Neogene of Italy. Their rather typical morphology suggests applying a name which is precise and in the meantime indicates the ambiguous generic placement (i.e., not Cupressaceae gen. et sp. indet., but cf. Thuja saviana or “ Thuja ” saviana ).
The shoots of “ Thuja ” saviana are similar to another common type of shoot found in the Italian Messinian, which has lateral leaves touching each other at the base ( Guglielmetto and Iguera 1994), and has been assigned to Chamaecyparis sp. ( Teodoridis et al. 2015a, b). This identification receives support from the occurrence of Chamaecyparis cones and seeds in the Italian Neogene (but only in Pliocene sites; e.g., Martinetto et al. 2018b), even if they have not yet been described in detail. We hope that future cuticular studies will permit a more definite generic assignment of both types of shoots.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.