Thuja, C.Linnaeus, 1753

Martinetto, Edoardo, Bertini, Adele, Mantzouka, Dimitra, Natalicchio, Marcello, Niccolini, Gabriele & Kovar-Eder, Johanna, 2022, Remains Of A Subtropical Humid Forest In A Messinian Evaporitebearing Succession At Govone, Northwestern Italy - Preliminary Results, Fossil Imprint 78 (1), pp. 157-188 : 168

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.37520/fi.2022.007

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DE6965-FF80-ED2D-849E-FC22FE1EF799

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Thuja
status

 

Thuja View in CoL View at ENA saviana (C.T.GAUDIN) C.T. GAUDIN, 1859

Text-fig. 5a View Text-fig , Pl. 1, Figs 8, 9

M a t e r i a l. Two leafy shoots from GLAz (MGPTPU141007, MGPT-PU141008), one from GLA20 (MGPTPU141093) and another from GLA30 (MGPT-PU141094).

D e s c r i p t i o n. Plagiotropic leafy shoots with dimorphic decussate scale leaves, with broad facial leaves and lateral ones usually not touching each other at the base.

R e m a r k s. The shoots seem to be identical to the Miocene shoots from central Italy on which Gaudin and Strozzi (1859) based their fossil-species Thuja saviana . However, the general picture is complicated by the association of such shoots in the type locality ( Gaudin and Strozzi 1859: pl. 1), and in a Spanish site ( Barron and Diéguez 2001) with cones that may belong to Calocedrus . Therefore, it is suspected but not proved, that the type of T. saviana may belong to Calocedrus (see also Kvaček et al. 2020 for the fossil record in Europe), a hypothesis further supported by the fact that cones with diagnostic characters for Thuja have never been reported for the Neogene of Italy. Their rather typical morphology suggests applying a name which is precise and in the meantime indicates the ambiguous generic placement (i.e., not Cupressaceae gen. et sp. indet., but cf. Thuja saviana or “ Thuja saviana ).

The shoots of “ Thuja saviana are similar to another common type of shoot found in the Italian Messinian, which has lateral leaves touching each other at the base ( Guglielmetto and Iguera 1994), and has been assigned to Chamaecyparis sp. ( Teodoridis et al. 2015a, b). This identification receives support from the occurrence of Chamaecyparis cones and seeds in the Italian Neogene (but only in Pliocene sites; e.g., Martinetto et al. 2018b), even if they have not yet been described in detail. We hope that future cuticular studies will permit a more definite generic assignment of both types of shoots.

Kingdom

Plantae

Phylum

Tracheophyta

Class

Pinopsida

Order

Pinales

Family

Cupressaceae

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF