Leptusa (Neopisalia) gibbera, Assing, 2011

Assing, V., 2011, New species and additional records of Leptusa from the Caucasus region and the Himalaya (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Aleocharinae), Linzer biologische Beiträge 43 (1), pp. 253-265 : 254-255

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5324196

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A0546682-3521-434F-B896-D5806F286D2D

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DE8784-EF5C-A421-FF5F-FAF6FBADFA2F

treatment provided by

Carolina

scientific name

Leptusa (Neopisalia) gibbera
status

sp. nov.

Leptusa (Neopisalia) gibbera View in CoL nov.sp. ( Figs 1-14 View Figs 1-14 )

T y p e m a t e r i a l: Holotype: "RU: Krasnod. Kr. NW Cauc. Temnolesskaia nr. Mezmai, 750 m, 7.VI.1999, A. Smetana [ R2 ] / Holotypus Leptusa gibbera sp. n. det. V. Assing 2010" (cAss). Paratypes: 3: same data as holotype (cSme, cAss); 1: "RU: Krasnod. Kr. NW Cauc. Temnolesskaia nr. Mezmai, 800 m, 8.VI.1999, A. Smetana [ R3 ]" (cSme) .

D e s c r i p t i o n: Body length 3.5-4.0 mm. Habitus as in Fig. 1 View Figs 1-14 . Coloration: head dark-brown to blackish-brown; pronotum and elytra brown to dark-brown; abdomen brown, with segment VI and anterior half of segment VII infuscate; legs and antennae reddish to reddish brown, usually with antennomeres I-III somewhat paler.

Head ( Figs 2-3 View Figs 1-14 ) approximately as long as wide or weakly oblong; punctation dense and shallow, somewhat indistinct in the pronounced microsculpture ( Fig. 4 View Figs 1-14 ); dorsal surface almost matt; eyes weakly convex, not distinctly projecting from lateral contours of head, slightly shorter than postocular portion in dorsal view. Antenna rather slender ( Fig. 5 View Figs 1-14 ), approximately 1.0 mm long; antennomeres I-III distinctly oblong and of subequal length; IV weakly oblong; V approximately as wide as long; X barely 1.5 times as wide as long. Maxillary palpi slender; preapical palpomere approximately 4 times as long as broad.

Pronotum ( Figs 2-3 View Figs 1-14 ) approximately 1.25-1.30 times as wide as long and 1.30-1.35 times as wide as head; maximal width in, or slightly before middle; posterior angles marked; punctation dense, fine, and shallow, not very evident in the pronounced microsculpture ( Fig. 6 View Figs 1-14 ); surface almost matt.

Elytra ( Figs 2-3 View Figs 1-14 ) sexually dimorphic, 0.85-0.95 times as long as pronotum, laterally with rather pronounced and extensive oblong impression; posterior margin distinctly sinuate near postero-lateral angles; punctation much more pronounced than that of head and pronotum; interstices with shallow microsculpture and subdued shine. Hind wings reduced. Legs slender; metatarsomere I slightly longer than the combined length of II and III.

Abdomen subparallel, approximately as wide as elytra; tergites III-V with deep and coarsely punctate anterior impressions ( Fig. 7 View Figs 1-14 ); punctation distinct, dense on anterior and sparser on posterior tergites; posterior margin of tergite VII with palisade fringe; tergite VII with sexual dimorphism.

: elytra with pronounced protuberance on either side of suture ( Fig. 2 View Figs 1-14 ); tergite VII with smooth and distinctly elevated long median carina ( Fig. 7 View Figs 1-14 ); posterior margin of sternite VII broadly and weakly concave, on either side of this concavity with two very long marginal setae; tergite VIII with short and weakly pronounced median carina, posterior margin weakly concave in the middle ( Fig. 8 View Figs 1-14 ); sternite VIII oblong, much longer than tergite VIII, posterior margin obtusely produced in the middle ( Fig. 9 View Figs 1-14 ); aedeagus 0.68 mm long, with long and slender ventral process and with long internal structures ( Fig. 10 View Figs 1-14 ); apical lobe of paramere slender ( Fig. 11 View Figs 1-14 ).

: elytra without protuberances ( Fig. 3 View Figs 1-14 ); posterior margin of tergite VIII indistinctly concave in the middle ( Fig. 12 View Figs 1-14 ); posterior margin of sternite VIII strongly convex ( Fig. 13 View Figs 1-14 ); spermatheca as in Fig. 14. View Figs 1-14

E t y m o l o g y: The specific epithet is a Latin adjective (with protuberances) and alludes to the modifications of the male elytra.

C o m p a r a t i v e n o t e s: Based on the conspicuous derived morphology of the aedeagus, L. gibbera is closely related to L. laeviuscula (HOCHHUTH 1849) and to the syntopic L. venusta . It is distinguished from both of them by the shorter and more slender elytra (in L. venusta and L. laeviuscula at least as long as the pronotum), the pronounced lateral impressions of the elytra, the pronounced protuberances on the male elytra, and particularly by the morphology of the aedeagus. For illustrations of the genitalia of L. venusta and L. laeviuscula see PACE (1989).

D i s t r i b u t i o n a n d n a t u r a l h i s t o r y: Thespecimenswerecollected near Mezmay, Krasnodarskiy Kray, Western Caucasus, at altitudes of 750- 800 m. They were sifted from deep leaf litter in mixed beech and fir forests (SMETANA pers. comm.).

T

Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics

V

Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Staphylinidae

Genus

Leptusa

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Staphylinidae

Genus

Leptusa

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF