Myoporophylus carinatus, Randall T. Schuh & Michael D. Schwartz, 2016
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.269465 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DE8796-BEB4-0491-7BA3-3F17FC78898E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Myoporophylus carinatus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Myoporophylus carinatus , new species
Figure 58, map 16, table 1, plate 19
DIAGNOSIS: In addition to attributes provided in the generic diagnosis, recognized by the unique carinate lateral margin of the pronotum and somewhat smaller size than in M. grossi (pl. 19); endosoma in M. carinatus large and nearly J-shaped (fig. 58, pl. 19), whereas in M. grossi endosoma smaller and more strongly sigmoid (fig. 59, pl. 19); antennal segment 2 in M. carinatus much shorter than in M. grossi .
DESCRIPTION: MALE: Mean total length 3.25, mean pronotum width 1.18. COLORATION (pl. 19): As in generic description. SURFACE AND VESTITURE (pl. 19): As in generic description. STRUCTURE (pl. 19): Head: Weakly transverse, conforming to anterior margin of pronotum, eyes not bulging; frons rounded and moderately projecting beyond eyes; eye occupying slightly less than twothirds height of head; antenna inserted just above ventral margin of eye, eye not emargin ‐ ate at insertion; antennal segment 2 short (0.44), stout, of uniform diameter, 0.57 times width of head; labium reaching midpoint of mesosternum. Thorax: Pronotum broad along midline and shieldlike, lateral margins carinate, weakly convex, posterior margin moderately excavated; mesoscutum moderately exposed. Hemelytron: Lateral margin rather strongly convex, overall body form broadly ovoid. GENITALIA (fig. 58, pl. 19): Pygophore: Triangular. Endosoma: Large, J-shaped and weakly sigmoid, apical portion from basal curve to apex of endosoma about twice as long as basal curved region; dorsal strap bifid proximad of secondary gonopore forming short narrow spine terminating proximad of gonopore and long thin, minutely serrate, apical spine subtended by short prominent triangular spine; ventral strap terminating as thin spine subapically at level of prominent spine of dorsal strap. Phallotheca: Dorsal margin with short crest basad. Parameres: Left paramere elongate in dorsal view, dorsoposterior margin produced posteriad, slightly elevated above posterior and anterior processes; posterior process with undulating lateral margin, distally long and straight; anterior process small, broad basally, forming sharp apex on anteromedial surface; prom ‐ inent seta on lateral surface of lobe. Right paramere elongate, somewhat fusiform with blunt medial point.
FEMALE (pl. 19): Coloration as in male; differing from male as in generic description; mean total length 3.24, mean pronotum width 1.21.
ETYMOLOGY: From the Latin, carina, “keel,” in reference to the carinate lateral margin of the pronotum.
HOST: Recorded from Eremophila scoparia (Scrophulariaceae) .
DISTRIBUTION (map 16): Known from southeastern South Australia and the Kalgoorlie region of Western Australia.
HOLOTYPE: AUSTRALIA: Western Australia: 53.9 km N of Kalgoorlie , 30.28882°S 121.2558°E, 600 m, 24 Oct 1996, Schuh and Cassis, Eremophila scoparia (R.Br.) F. Muell. (Scrophulariaceae) , det. PERTH staff PERTH 0 5095123, 1d (AMNH_PBI 0 0 13 5775) (WAMP).
PARATYPES: AUSTRALIA: South Australia: Donggali Cons. Park, 30.1 km S of Oakbank, 33.28742°S 140.5881°E, 100 m, 0 8 Nov 1996, Schuh and Cassis, Eremophila scoparia (R.Br.) F. Muell. (Scrophulariaceae) , det. PERTH staff PERTH 0 5236533, 1d (00413076) (WAMP). Western Australia: 53.9 km N of Kalgoorlie , 30.28882°S 121.2558°E, 600 m, 24 Oct 1996, Schuh and Cassis, Eremophila scoparia (R.Br.) F. Muell. (Scrophulariaceae) , det. PERTH staff PERTH 0 5095123, 7d (00388832–00388838), 6 nymphs (00388839–00388844), 5♂ (00388845– 00388849) (AM), 4d (00135772, 0 0 135776, 0 0 135773, 00135777), 3♂ (00135778–00135780) (AMNH), 2d (00135771, 00135774), 1♂ (00135781) (WAMP).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |