Meteorus (Haliday, 1835)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3084.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5244757 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DE87D0-861B-FF95-A7C5-FA82FA62C680 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Meteorus |
status |
|
Key to European species of Meteorus View in CoL View at ENA :
1 Dorsope absent ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 18–25 ), sometimes weakly indicated ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 18–25 ), ventral borders of petiolar tergum (laterotergites) fused or almost joining in middle, from near the base of the petiolar tergum to its midpoint ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 18–25 ).......................... 2
– Dorsope distinct; ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 18–25 ) ventral borders of petiolar tergum not joining or fused, usually widely separated ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 18–25 )..... 16
2 OOL=0.5–2 ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 18–25 ); ocelli large; often yellow/reddish coloured body........................................... 3
– OOL=2–3 ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 18–25 ); ocelli small; often darker coloured body (except in colon View in CoL where OOL=1.5–2 and body yellow to dark). 9
3 Petiolar tergum with the baso-ventral triangular area elongate; tergum fused subbasally ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 18–25 ); petiolar terum often with traces of dorsope ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 18–25 ).............................................................................. 4
– Petiolar tergum fused ventrally from the base of the segment ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 26–32 ); petiolar tergum without traces of dorsopes ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 18–25 ). 8
4 Setae on clypeus long ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 26–32 ), clypeus short in hight and wide, protruding....................................... 5
– Setae on clypeus short ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 26–32 ) or slightly longer than short; clypeus long, narrow and protruding..................... 6
5 Marginal cell of fore wing narrow and short ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 26–32 ); antennal articles of ♀ 24–28 (♂ 26–30); upper tooth of mandible long; malar space of ♀ 0.5– 0.8 times basal width of mandible; traces of dorsope on some specimens; colour varying.............................................................................................. M. rubens ( Nees, 1811) View in CoL
– Marginal cell of fore wing wide and long ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 26–32 ); antennal articles of ♀ 30–32; malar space of ♀ 0.4 times basal width of mandible; traces of dorsope more or less distinct; body yellow............................ M. heliophilus Fischer View in CoL 197
6 Body entirely black and rugose ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 26–32 ); malar space of ♀ equal or slightly longer than basal width of mandible; antennal articles of ♀ 25–27; OOL =1.2–1.5; ovipositor 1.5–2.0 times length of petiolar tergum...................................................................................................... M. acerbiavorus Belokobylskij et al. 2011
– Body with some parts mostly yellow-coloured.............................................................. 7
7 Clypeus distinctly protruding, rounded ( Fig. 105 View FIGURES 80–133 ); OOL =0.5 ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 26–32 ); setae on clypeus scattered; temples strongly contracted ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 26–32 ); length of ovipositor about 1.5–2.0 times length of petiolar tergum; antennal articles of ♀ 31–33.............................................................................................. M. lionotus Thomson, 1895 View in CoL
– Clypeus with peculiar cushion-like shape, protruding but “flattened” ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 26–32 ); OOL =1.5; setae on clypeus dense and short; temples rounded; ovipositor 1.5–2.0 times length of petiolar tergum; antennal articles of ♀ 29–33................................................................................................ M. pulchricornis ( Wesmael, 1835) View in CoL
8 Ovipositor slender, length 1.6–2.5 times petiolar tergum; eyes not protruding ( Fig. 113 View FIGURES 80–133 ); temples rounded; clypeus as wide as face; base of petiolar tergum brownish or blackish; antennal articles of ♀ 27–30............ M. obsoletus ( Wesmael, 1835) View in CoL
– Ovipositor rather thick and 1.4–2.0 times length of petiolar tergum; eyes protruding ( Fig. 132 View FIGURES 80–133 ); base of petiolar tergum often pale yellow, almost translucent basally ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 33–40 ); antennal articles of ♀ 29–33.............. M. versicolor ( Wesmael, 1835) View in CoL
9 Face forming a “shelf” ( Fig. 34 View FIGURES 33–40 ); wings short and narrow, often infumate ( Fig. 35 View FIGURES 33–40 ); face strongly convex; propodeum strongly reticulate–rugose, without distinct carinae; occipital carina interrupted medio-dorsally; body compact and dark brown ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 33–40 ); antennal articles of ♀ 23–26 (♂ 24–28) OOL =3................................. M. micropterus ( Haliday, 1835) View in CoL
– Face without such shelf; wings longer and wider; body colour varying, often legs yellow; antennal articles of ♀ 21–34... 10
10 Mandibles stout, not twisted, clypeus rather flat ( Fig. 98 View FIGURES 80–133 ); propodeum with strong anterior transverse carina and medial longitudinal carina ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 33–40 ); vein m–cu of fore wing distinctly antefurcal or interstitial; antennal articles of ♀ 21–27; pterostigma dark brown......................................................................................... 11
– Mandibles small and more or less twisted ( Fig. 86 View FIGURES 80–133 ); clypeus rather protruding; propodeum without anterior transverse carina or with a median longitudinal carina ( Fig. 38 View FIGURES 33–40 ); vein m–cu of fore wing (sub) interstitial or postfurcal ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 33–40 ), exceptionally shortly antefurcal; antennal articles of ♀ 24–34; pterostigma variable.......................................... 12
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.