Luzaridella miniata, Desutter-Grandcolas & Faberon, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/zoosystema2020v42a32 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4B5EE94B-F254-4B4D-BED1-746AE71A5FDC |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4404638 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DE87FC-FFEA-3525-FE87-F988FC8BBDAF |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Luzaridella miniata |
status |
sp. nov. |
Luzaridella miniata n. sp.
( Figs 7 View FIG , 8 View FIG , 9 View FIG A-E; Table 5)
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:9B67BEAE-A1A0-4DE8-BB6C-39FF8F9F74A0
TYPE LOCALITY. — French Guiana, Monts Tumuc-Humac, Massif du Mitaraka.
TYPE MATERIAL. — Holotype by originalpresent designation. French Guiana • 1♂; Monts Tumuc-Humac , Massif du Mitaraka vers sommet en Cloche; entre 54.4541 O 2.2349 N et 54.4646 O 2.2329 N; alt. entre 370 m et 470 m; 23.II.-10.III.2015; F. Legendre & S. Hugel leg.; fn. SH412, de nuit; MNHN-EO-ENSIF9752 (male in bad condition, covered with dry mold). GoogleMaps
Allotype. French Guiana • 1 ♀; Monts Tumuc-Humac, Massif du Mitaraka vers sommet en Cloche; entre 54.4541 O 2.2349 N et GoogleMaps 54.4646 O 2.2329 N; alt. entre 370 m et 470 m; 23.II.-10.III.2015; F. Legendre & S. Hugel leg.; fn. SH398, de nuit; MNHN-EO-ENSIF9757. GoogleMaps
Paratypes: 2 females. French Guiana • 1 ♀; Monts Tumuc-Humac, Massif du Mitaraka, Layon A; entre 54.4509 O 2.2357 N et 54.4547 O 2.2405 N; alt. entre 280 m et 365 m; 23.II.-10.III.2015; F. Legendre & S. Hugel leg.; fn. SH111, de nuit; MNHN-EO-ENSIF9755 GoogleMaps • 1♀; MontsTumuc-Humac, Massif du Mitaraka, D2; 54.451125 O 2.234786 N; alt. 300 m; 23.II.-10.III.2015; F. Legendre & S. Hugel leg.; fn. SH080, de nuit; MNHN-EO-ENSIF9745. GoogleMaps
OTHER MATERIAL EXAMINED. — French Guiana • 1♀; Monts Tumuc-Humac, Massif du Mitaraka, D 2; 54.451125 O 2.234786 N; alt. 300 m; 23.II.-10.III.2015; F. Legendre & S. Hugel leg.; fn. SH027, de nuit; MNHN GoogleMaps .
ETYMOLOGY. — Species named after its slender shape compared to other species of the genus.
DIAGNOSIS. — Within the genus, species relatively large, with thin PIII at least in males ( Fig. 7A View FIG ). Male FWs relatively soft, compared to other species of the genus, covering abdomen up to tergite 7; stridulum complete. Male genitalia distinctive (A-sclerite protruding as a thick curved spine; pseudepiphallic apical sclerotization X-shaped, delimiting a pair of distal cavities very lightly sclerotized dorsally, and a free sclerotized process more ventrally; distal twothird of ectophallic apodemes rubbon-like and thin, curved ventrally toward pseudepiphallic parameres, anterior third vertical). Female copulatory papilla oval, with dorsal and ventral sides little sclerotized. Species differing from Luzaridella maculata n. sp. by male and female genitalia (compare Fig. 7 View FIG D-G and Fig. 11 View FIG E-G), male stridulatory file, a bigger size (compare Table 5 and 6) and sternite coloration (light brown with median part darker). More similar to Luzaridella annulata Desutter-Grandcolas,1992 from which it can be separated by its larger size, darker coloration (especially for annulated legs), and female copulatory papilla (compare Fig. 9 View FIG C-E and Desutter-Grandcolas 1992a, figure 9).
DESCRIPTION
In addition to characters of the genus (Desutter-Grandcolas 1992a):
General morphology
TIII serrulation lacking between subapical spurs and apical spurs on both sides; on inner side, two to four spines (mean 2.5 in male, 3.5 in females) between isa1 and isa2, two to four (mean 2.5 in male, 3.3 in females) spines between isa2 and isa3, three to four spines (mean 4 in male, 3.8 in females) between isa3 and isa4, 12-13 spines in male (mean 12.5) and 11-15 spines (mean 13.5) in females above isa4; on outer side, three to four spines (mean 3 in male, 3.3 in females) between osa1 and osa2, three to four spines (mean 3 in male, 3.5 in females) between osa2 and osa3, four to six spines (mean 4 in male, 5.3 in females) between osa3 and osa4, 11-12 spines (mean 11.5) in male, and 12-13 (mean 12.5) spines in females above osa4. Basitarsomere III serrulation: six to seven inner spines (mean 6.5 in male, 6.8 in females), six to nine outer spines (mean 6.5 in male, 7.3 in females) in addition to apical spines.
Coloration
Head: Face light brown marked with yellow; cheeks darker than face; ocelli marked with black; vertex and occiput dark brown, with four longitudinal yellow lines ( Fig. 8A View FIG ): two outer lines starting at median ocellus, reaching lateral ocelli, forked at beginning of vertex, and extending to pronotum; two inner lines, shorter than outer stripes. Eyes grey. Antennal pits whitish. Scapes yellow with two brown rings, one at base, one at apex. Antennae yellow at base, then brown with yellow rings. Mouthparts white with light brown spots. Palpi light brown, white on their dorsal and ventral sides. Pronotum DD and LL separated by a wide yellow stripe ( Fig. 8A, B View FIG ); DD light brown with lighter muscular inscriptions and two yellow spots (close to yellow stripes) on posterior margin; LL ferruginous brown, light brown to yellow close to anterior angle. Legs: FI and FII yellow with three brown rings. TI and TII brown with two and three yellow rings, respectively. Tarsomeres I and II brown, yellow at their base. FIII yellow with brown pattern: outer side and inner base striped with brown; a brown ring near apex; apex brown. TIII brown on dorsal side, lighter on ventral side; with two yellow rings barely visible; spurs yellowish, their base and apex dark; tarsomeres III light brown. Tergites light brown with dark brown and yellow pattern ( Fig. 8C View FIG ). Sternites light brown with a darker median part. Cerci light brown, with a brown ring close to brown apex.
Male
Metanotum glandular, covered with many long setae ( Fig. 7C View FIG ). Forewings ( Fig. 7B View FIG ) wider than pronotum and abdomen, trapezoidal (wider posteriorly than anteriorly); long for the genus, reaching tergite 7. Venation faint ( Fig. 9A, B View FIG ); lateral field with four parallel longitudinal veins, the second branched distally; stridulum complete, harp without vein, mirror much wider than long, not crossed by any vein; PCu very oblique, bearing a very short file located very high on the vein and with only five teeth.
Male genitalia ( Fig. 7 View FIG D-G)
Genitalia slightly wider than long, with very short rami ( Fig. 7D View FIG ). Pseudepiphallic arms well-developed; membrane separating them sclerotized apically as two cup-like sclerites connected together and extending toward sclerotized parts of EEI and ectophallic fold as a pair of free sclerotized processes ( Fig. 7D, G View FIG ); A-sclerite hook-like; B-sclerite ( Fig. 7F View FIG ) widened before apex, then regularly narrowed toward acute apex; pseudepiphallc parameres simple, not hook-like, between pseudepiphallic apical sclerites and A-sclerites ( Fig. 7D, E, G View FIG ). Ectophallic apodemes thin and rubbon-like on anterior twothird, as a curved, vertical lamella on posterior third ( Fig. 7D View FIG ); arc fully sclerotized, sinuous ( Fig. 7D View FIG ); pseudepiphallic sclerite anterior part vertical, abutting against ectophallic apodeme ( Fig. 7D View FIG ). Ectophallic fold short, with a trifid apical sclerite ( Fig. 7E View FIG ). Endophallic sclerite very short, distal apex trifid ( Fig. 7E View FIG ); endophallic apodeme very short, lamella-like. No dorsal cavity.
Female
Larger than male. FWs short, not overlapping, reaching tergite 3. Dorsal field with seven to nine longitudinal veins, lateral field with four or five longitudinal veins.
Female genitalia
Copulatory papilla ( Fig. 9 View FIG C-E) small (less than 1 mm long), nearly oval in shape, distal margin bisinuate, ventral and dorsal sides less sclerotized.
Measurements (in mm)
See Table 5.
Variation
Size highly variable in females. First ring of FI and FII sometimes hardly marked.Dorsal disc and tergites sometimes darker.
MNHN |
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |