Octodrilus hemiandrus (Cognetti, 1901)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4496.1.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F658011C-415A-464F-B947-E2DF422005AC |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5993362 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DFA10C-833A-507E-2CE7-FD0534A3D696 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Octodrilus hemiandrus (Cognetti, 1901) |
status |
|
Octodrilus hemiandrus (Cognetti, 1901)
Octolasium hemiandrum CognETTI, 1901 BoLL. MUs. TorIno, 16(383): 3.
Octolasium (Octodrilus) hemiandrum : OModEo 1956 Arc. ZooL. ITAL., 41: 177.
Octodrilus hemiandrus : ZIcsI 1981 OpUsc. ZooL. (BUdApEsT), 17–18: 163.
Octodrilus hemiander : ZIcsI 1986 OpUsc. ZooL. (BUdApEsT), 22: 108.
Octodrilus hemiandrus: MršIć 1991 Monogr. EArThw. BALkAns: 410.
Material examined. OrtoBot Roma 1 ( EWITA307-15 ): Botanical garden of Rome, Italy, 30/10/2011, leg. Maurizio G. Paoletti. (One specimen).
Diagnosis. Small sized worms, 60–100 mm by 5–6 mm. Colour reddish on dorsum and paler on ventrum. Male pores on 15 small. Clitellum on 1/n 28, 29–37; tubercles on 1/n 28, 29–39. Nephridiopores irregularly alternate between b and above d. One pair of testes enclosed in suboesophageal testis sacs in 11. Vesicles in 10, 12 of more or less equal size. Spermathecae seven pairs, constant in 6/7–12/13.
Remarks. Externally this species is also similar to the smaller exemplars of Oc. complanatus , however, the reddish hints seen frequently on dorsum can distinguish it from complanatus . As regards the internal anatomical structure, the metandric male condition is clearly differentiating it from the congeners with similar clitellar position.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |