Callipia constantinaria Oberthür, 1881
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2018.404 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EFD82C30-DBD4-40D0-8FE5-FAE10B7E560D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5692295 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E0B61B-FF8F-F747-FDB4-FA74240AFD53 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Callipia constantinaria Oberthür, 1881 |
status |
|
Callipia constantinaria Oberthür, 1881 View in CoL
Figs 43–44 View Figs43–48 , 59 View Figs59–66
Assigned BIN: BOLD:AAD6679.
Diagnosis
The yellow blotch on the forewing is the smallest among all species of the constantinaria group. The male genitalia of the holotype are lost, but male genitalia are very similar among all species in the group. COI-barcode: the minimum observed distance to the genetically most similar species ( C.brenemanae ) is 3.9%. The most reliable identification method appears to be through DNA barcoding.
Type material
Holotype ( Fig. 43 View Figs43–48 ) PERU: ♂, [Junín?] Punamarca , 30 Jan. 1873, Constantin Jelski leg. ( NHM). The genitalia are lost.
Other material examined
PERU: 1 ♂, Cusco, Ollantaytambo-Quillabamba R[oa]d, km 158 , [ca 13.148° S, 72.513° W], 2945 m ( AMNH) ( C-0085 with GS, COI sequence 658 bp, BIN, Figs 44 View Figs43–48 , 59 View Figs59–66 ). GoogleMaps
Description
As illustrated. The female is unknown.
Distribution
Eastern Andes of central and south eastern Peru, 3000 m.
Remarks
Many museum specimens were identified as C. constantinaria but will often actually belong to C. occulta stat. rev. and other species. The female is unknown.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Larentiinae |
Tribe |
Stamnodini |
Genus |