Lissorhoptrus, OF
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1649/0010-065x-68.2.163 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DDDCBC36-2A68-47FA-A25B-A557295DCDEA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5344562 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E0D632-FFA7-0417-FD65-FD75FB2E68AC |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Lissorhoptrus |
status |
|
KEY TO THE SPECIES OF LISSORHOPTRUS OF View in CoL
NORTH AMERICA NORTH OF MEXICO
1. Tarsomere 3 distinctly wider than 2, emarginate to cordate ( Fig. 35b View Fig ).............................2
1′. Tarsomere 3 not wider than 2, sublinear, truncate ( Fig. 35a View Fig ) ........................................................... 4
2. Apical area of rostrum glabrous; midtibiae with long, fine swimming hairs on inner and outer margins; male hind tibia with large premucro; rarely coastal, associated with fresh water....... ..................................... L. buchanani Kuschel View in CoL
2′. Apical area of rostrum densely clothed with hydrofuge scales and setae; midtibia lacking long swimming hairs; male hind tibia lacking premucro; coastal, associated with salt marshes and/or intertidal zones..................................... 3
3. Antennal funicle short, ca. 0.80X longer than scape; ocular lobe moderately welldeveloped; odd-numbered elytral intervals with inconspicuous, curved setae on scarcely evident swellings............. L. chapini Kuschel View in CoL
3′. Antennal funicle long, ca. 1.50X longer than scape; ocular lobe weakly developed; oddnumbered elytral intervals lacking setae, with weakly developed swellings only on declivity ...................................... L. insularis Kuschel View in CoL
4. Elytra less than 1.60X as long as wide at humeri, intervals usually with 3 or more rows of scales; apical margin of female tergite VII medially not to moderately deeply emarginated (except L. oryzophilus View in CoL ); widely distributed .................................................................. 6
4′. Elytra greater than 1.62X as long as wide at humeri; intervals usually with 2 or 3 rows of scales; apical margin of female tergite VII medially weakly to moderately deeply emarginate; Florida only.......................................5
5. Funicle short, 0.80X as long as scape; pronotal apical constriction at apical 1/3, pronotal side margins strongly rounded behind constriction, not distinctly impressed behind rounded margin; female tergite VII with apical margin moderately deeply emarginate medially........ ................................ L. longipennis Kuschel View in CoL
5′. Funicle long, 1.20X as long as scape; pronotal apical constriction at apical 1/6, pronotum weakly rounded behind constriction, distinctly sinuately impressed behind rounded margin; female tergite VII with apical margin nearly straight, weakly sinuate medially ........ .................................... L. longitarsis Kuschel View in CoL
6. Male hind tibial mucro with 3 large teeth, 2 apical anteriorly directed teeth appearing forked; female tergite VII deeply, narrowly emarginate medially; frons with 2 distinct, curved, submedian setae ................................. .................................. L. oryzophilus Kuschel View in CoL
6′. Male hind tibial mucro with 2 or 3 teeth of variable size, not appearing forked anteriorly; female tergite VII not or at most moderately emarginate medially; frons lacking submedian curved seta or with numerous setae .............7
7. Elytra ca. 0.25X wider at base than pronotum; rostrum with dorsum nearly straight, uneven, flattened along midline; pronotal ocular lobes weakly developed; scape with 1 or 2 apical setae ............................................ L. lacustris Kuschel View in CoL
7′. Elytra ca. 0.40X wider at base than pronotum; rostrum with dorsum weakly curved, even, convex along midline or weakly curved with apex abruptly depressed; pronotal ocular lobes moderately to strongly developed; scape with several to numerous setae.............................8
8. Frons with numerous distinct, curved, submedian setae; rostrum with dorsum weakly curved, even, convex along midline; pronotal ocular lobes moderately strongly developed; scape with several setae; East of Rocky Mountains .......................................... L. simplex (Say)
8′. Frons lacking setae; rostrum with dorsum weakly curved, weakly convex along midline, apex abruptly depressed; pronotal ocular lobes strongly developed; scape with numerous setae; Arizona only ......................................... .......... L. robbinsorum View in CoL O’ Brien, new species
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.