Suarius nanus ( McLachlan, 1893 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5180.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B6D071D8-6D56-46FD-B1B6-250394D9D6F7 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7046912 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E10867-FF82-FFA6-348B-B24AFD5DE22F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Suarius nanus ( McLachlan, 1893 ) |
status |
|
Suarius nanus ( McLachlan, 1893) View in CoL
( Fig. 58 View FIGURE 58 )
Chrysopa nanus McLachlan, 1893: 231 . Type locality: Turkey (Adana).
Chrysopa pretiosa Gerstaecker, 1894: 158 View in CoL . Type locality: Unknown.
Chrysopa nymphula Navás, 1910c: 475 View in CoL . Type locality: Greece (Attica).
Cintameva egena Navás, 1940: 101 View in CoL . Type locality: Cyprus (Limassol).
Diagnosis
Suarius nanus is similar to Suarius walsinghami orientalis in having similar brownish marking at the proximal crossvein of third intracubital cell (icu3) in the forewing ( Hölzel 1978: figs 1–2), but can be distinguished by the presence of basal dilation of pretarsal claws. No additional specimens were added in this study.
Distribution
Pakistan. Balochistan (Quetta), Gilgit-Baltistan (Gilgit, Hunza, Nagar), –– Afghanistan, South-Eastern Europe (Macedonia, Greece), Northern Africa (Algeria), Middle East (widespread) ( Hölzel 1967, 1978; Ari et al. 2007; Doboz et al. 2018; Hassan et al. 2019; Oswald 2022).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Suarius nanus ( McLachlan, 1893 )
Hassan, Muhammad Asghar & Liu, Xingyue 2022 |
Cintameva egena Navás, 1940: 101
Navas, L. 1940: 101 |
Chrysopa nymphula Navás, 1910c: 475
Navas, L. 1910: 475 |
Chrysopa nanus
McLachlan, R. 1893: 231 |