Atopsyche
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4139.1.3 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C40885DD-FB4C-461C-92CE-143BF7174E76 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6087966 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E19867-FFA5-893F-FF05-4EE4FA71809D |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Atopsyche |
| status |
|
Key to males of Atopsyche View in CoL species from Brazil
1 First article of each inferior appendage without apicomesal projection (subgenus Atopsyche View in CoL )........................ 2
- First article of each inferior appendage with apicomesal projection (subgenus Atopsaura (A.) longipennis View in CoL Group)........ 5
2(1) Second article of each inferior appendage tapered from base and hooked ventrad ( A. bolivari View in CoL Group)................... 3
- Second article of each inferior appendage broadened at base and trianguloid ( A. tripunctata View in CoL Group)................... 4
3(2) Posterolateral beaks of phallotheca posteriorly each divided into two long, paired processes, dorsal process longer and bifur- cate apically, ventral process curved mesad and crossing process from opposing beak ( Santos & Holzenthal 2012, fig. 2D).............................................................................................. A. parauna
- Posterolateral beaks of phallotheca posteriorly wide, truncate or shallowly divided, with apicoventral corners downturned ( Santos & Holzenthal 2012, fig. 2E–G)........................................................... A. urumarca View in CoL
4(2) Second article of each inferior appendage evenly tapering and rounded at apex ( Ross & King 1952, fig. 3A)...... A. erigia View in CoL
- Second article of each inferior appendage obtuse and truncate at apex ( Schmid 1989, pl. XVI, fig. 1)........ A. chirihuana View in CoL
5(1) Filipods absent ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 A)............................................................................... 6
- Filipods present ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 A)............................................................................ 14
6(5) Phallotheca without dorsal process ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 E)................................................................ 7
- Phallotheca with dorsal process ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 B)................................................................ 12
7(6) Apical portion of first article of each inferior appendage bifurcate ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 C)...................................... 8
- Apical portion of first article of each inferior appendage not bifurcate ( Schmid 1989, pl. XVII, fig. 5)................. 10
8(7) Basodorsal process of phallotheca elongate, curved, spine-like ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 E)....................... A. kamakan new species
- Basodorsal process of phallotheca broadening at tip ( Flint 1974, fig. 27)......................................... 9
9(8) Beaks of phallotheca each with lateral thin, deeply bifurcate lobe at mid-length ( Flint 1974, fig. 27)......... A. sanctipauli View in CoL
- Beaks of phallotheca without lateral thin, deeply bifurcate lobes ( Schmid 1989, pl. XVII, fig. 9)................ A. huarcu View in CoL
10(7) Basodorsal process of phallotheca longer than inferior appendages ( Schmid 1989, pl. XVII, fig. 5)......... A. huamachucu View in CoL
- Basodorsal process of phallotheca shorter than inferior appendages ( Schmid 1989, pl. XVII, fig. 3)................... 11
11(10) Basodorsal process of phallotheca tapering at tip ( Schmid 1989, pl. XVII, fig. 3)........................ A. huacachaca View in CoL
- Dorsal process of phallotheca broadening at tip ( Schmid 1989, pl. XVII, fig. 8).......................... A. hatunpuna View in CoL
12(6) Inferior appendages each with apicoventral process ( Marlier 1964, fig. 3A)............................... A. plancki View in CoL
- Inferior appendages without apicoventral processes ( Figs. 3 View FIGURE 3 C, 3G)............................................ 13
13(12) Parapods forked and terminating in two slender branches ( Schmid 1989, pl. XVIII, fig. 10)................. A. apurimac View in CoL
- Parapods not forked, but apicodorsally with upcurved sclerotized projection ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 C).......... A. diamantina new species
14(5) Filipods shorter than parapods ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 A)................................................................. 15
- Filipods longer or about as long as parapods ( Santos & Holzenthal 2012, fig. 1A)................................ 19
15(14) Inferior appendages downcurved at midlength ( Ross 1953, fig. 9A)........................................... 16
- Inferior appendages straight ( Schmid 1989, pl. XVII, fig. 6)................................................... 18
16(15) Short thumb-like process present mesoventral of filipods and parapods and above phallotheca ( Ross 1953, fig. 9A) … A. serica View in CoL
- Thumblike process absent ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 C)...................................................................... 17
17(16) Phallic apparatus with middorsal hood ( Flint 1971, fig. 2)................................................ A. siolii View in CoL
- Phallic apparatus without middorsal hood ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 D)....................................... A. muelleri new species
18(15) Second article of each inferior appendage pyriform; parapods about as long as basal height, abruptly taller in apical third ( Schmid 1989, pl. XVIII, fig. 2)................................................................ A. acahuana View in CoL
- Second article of each inferior appendage only slightly larger basally, not pyriform; parapods four times longer than tall, each with dorsal margin forming slight discontinuity in apical third ( Schmid 1989, pl. XVIII, fig. 6)............... A. antisuya
19(14) Filipods about as long as parapods ( Ross & King 1952, fig. 21A)............................................. 20
- Filipods longer than parapods ( Santos & Holzenthal 2012, fig. 1A)............................................ 21
20(19) Beaks of phallotheca each bearing short, strongly sclerotized posteroventral spine beneath long, setose, upturned process ( Ross & King 1952, fig. 21B)......................................................................... A. hamata View in CoL
- Thumb-like process absent mesoventral of filipods and parapods ( Ross & King 1952, fig. 22A)............. A. longipennis View in CoL
21(19) Phallotheca with long paired processes ( Santos & Holzenthal 2012, fig. 1E)..................................... 22
- Phallotheca without long paired processes ( Schmid 1989, pl. XVII, fig.14)...................................... 23
22(21) Beaks of phallotheca with several spines on their lateral edges; filipods exceeding length of parapods ( Santos & Holzenthal 2012, fig. 1A, 1B)............................................................................. A. blahniki
- Beaks of phallotheca without spines on their lateral edges ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 B; Flint 1974, fig. 24)........................ A. zernyi View in CoL
23(21) Second article of each inferior appendage dactylate ( Denning & Sykora 1968, fig. A)....................... A. usingeri View in CoL
- Second article of each inferior appendage concave on mesal face ( Schmid 1989, pl. XVII fig. 14)............ A. huanapu View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.