Tetralidia, Marques-Costa, Ana Paula & Cavichioli, Rodney Ramiro, 2008
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.184356 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6229943 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E387B7-3A5B-BD54-A99B-9D8FFCEFF919 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tetralidia |
status |
gen. nov. |
Tetralidia View in CoL gen. nov.
( Figures 1–23 View FIGURES 1 – 9 View FIGURES 10 – 21 View FIGURES 22 – 23 )
Type species: Cocoelidia prolata Chiamolera & Cavichioli, 2004 .
Diagnosis. Crown with two pairs of orange maculae, one close to anterior margin and another close to posterior margin, adjacent to compound eyes ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1 – 9 , 10 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ); transverse carina present at transition between crown and frons ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ); ocelli on anterior margin of head, at transition between crown and frons ( Figs 2 View FIGURES 1 – 9 , 11–12 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ); clypeus with lateral margins convergent apically ( Figs 2 View FIGURES 1 – 9 , 11 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ); posterior margin of pronotum emarginated and V-shaped ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1 – 9 , 10 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ); forewings with venation indistinct or slightly distinct with four apical cells and three anteapical cells ( Figs 3 View FIGURES 1 – 9 , 13 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ); hindwings with R4+5 and M1+2 preapically convergent, fused at apex, forming single vein. Male genitalia. Pygofer without processes or teeth ( Figs 4 View FIGURES 1 – 9 , 14–15 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ); connective V- or H-shaped, with forked stem at articulation point with aedeagus ( Figs 7 View FIGURES 1 – 9 , 18 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ); aedeagus long and slender with pair(s) of apical or preapical processes or lamellae ( Figs 8–9 View FIGURES 1 – 9 , 19–21 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ); anal tube with pair of basal processes ( Figs 4 View FIGURES 1 – 9 , 14–15 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ).
Total length. 8.0–9.6 mm.
Coloration. Body mostly yellow. Crown with two pairs of orange maculae, one close to anterior margin and another close to posterior margin, adjacent to compound eyes. Pronotum and scutellum with or without orange maculae or stripes ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1 – 9 , 10 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ). Yellowish forewings without maculae ( Figs 3 View FIGURES 1 – 9 , 13 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ).
Description. Crown almost quadrangular, slightly projected anteriorly, as wide as long; median length of crown approximately equal to interocular width and half of transocular width; anterior margin angular ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1 – 9 , 10 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ), with transverse carina at transition between crown and frons ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ); lateral margins, adjacent to compound eyes, elevated (not at same level of dorsum of compound eyes) and not carinate; surface flat and smooth, or slightly grooved (in T. prolata ), with coronal maculae and coronal suture indistinct ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1 – 9 , 10 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ); ocelli located on anterior margin of head, at transition between crown and frons, closer to compound eyes than to midline; antennal ledges, in lateral view, oblique and carinate ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ); antennal pit located slightly above or at same level of anteroventral angles of compound eyes ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ); antennal flagellum extended beyond basal half of forewings; frons length approximately 1.5 or two times basal width, profile convex, not swollen on central portion of base and not carinate; muscle impressions indistinct to slightly distinct; frontogenal sutures reaching ocelli; apical margin of maxillas approximately even with apex of clypeus; lorum approximately half-moon shaped, inferior margins not reaching apical margin of clypeus; gena partially concealing proepisterna, only apices visible in anterior view; epistomal suture distinct and complete, straight; clypeus with lateral margins convergent apically, and apical margin straight, with a slight gibbosity in lateral view ( Figs 2 View FIGURES 1 – 9 , 11–12 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ).
Thorax. Pronotum width between humeri approximately equal to transocular width, median length one third of width between humeri; posterior margin emarginate, V-shaped ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1 – 9 , 10 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ); dorsal surface with slight transverse grooves; dorsopleural carina complete and evident; mesothorax, in ventral view, moderately swollen; scutellum (sensu Young 1968) smooth, as long as maximum width, with distinct preapical fold ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1 – 9 , 10 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ). Forewings ( Figs 3 View FIGURES 1 – 9 , 13 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ) with rounded apex, without punctuations, hyaline, about 3 to 4.5 times longer than greatest width; venation indistinct or weakly visible, except for claval suture and apical cells; four apical cells present, base of third distal to second and fourth, last two approximately even; three anteapical cells usually distinct only apically, only outer anteapical cell closed; appendix narrow, extending only along first apical cell. Hindwings with three apical cells, R4+5 and M1+2 preapically convergent, fused at apex, forming single vein. Hindlegs: femoral formula 2+2+0 or 2+2+1; setal tibial row AD with long and robust setae, with two or more small intercalary setae; row PD with long, robust, little separated setae, distributed throughout length of tibia, intercalary setae absent; row AV with setae moderately long, distributed only on apical two-thirds of tibia, intercalary setae absent; row PV densely bristly, with short setae at base, becoming progressively longer toward apex; first tarsomere as long as combined length of two distal ones, plantar surface with two parallel rows of short setae.
Abdomen. Male genitalia. Pygofer basally enlarged, slightly narrowed towards apex or strongly narrowed at median third, without macrosetae or processes ( Figs 4 View FIGURES 1 – 9 , 14–15 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ). Valve entirely fused to subgenital plates and articulated to pygofer. Subgenital plates with variable shape, separated only in distal portion of apex, lateral margins constricted basally or preapically, approximately as long as pygofer, without macrosetae, and in lateral view, without apical tooth ( Figs 5 View FIGURES 1 – 9 , 16 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ). Style moderately long, without preapical lobe, lateral margins smooth, without irregularities or undulations, apex sclerotized, truncated, and slightly curved ventrally, apical third with bristles ( Figs 6–7 View FIGURES 1 – 9 , 17–18 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ). Connective V- or H-shaped, articulated to base of aedeagus, with stem forked at articulation point ( Figs 7 View FIGURES 1 – 9 , 18 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ). Aedeagus long and slender, with long preatrium, and short dorsal apodeme; one or more pair(s) of apical or preapical processes or lamellae present, and apical gonopore ( Figs 8–9 View FIGURES 1 – 9 , 19–21 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ). Anal tube with pair of basiventral processes of variable shape (extremely long in T. admirabilis sp. nov. and hooklike in T. prolata ) ( Figs 4 View FIGURES 1 – 9 , 14–15 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ).
Geographical distribution. Brazil and Peru.
Comments. The new genus is similar to Tozzita Kramer in having the lateral margins of the clypeus convergent towards the apex, and in lacking processes on the ventral margin of the male pygofer. It can be distinguished from the other genera of Neocoelidiinae by the following diagnostic characters: (1) male anal tube located on posterodorsal margin of pygofer, with basal pair of processes ( Figs 4 View FIGURES 1 – 9 , 14–15 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ); (2) male pygofer without processes or teeth ( Figs 4 View FIGURES 1 – 9 , 14–15 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ); (3) subgenital plates with basal or preapical constriction, separated only in distal portion of apex ( Figs 5 View FIGURES 1 – 9 , 16 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ); (4) style with truncated apex ( Figs 6–7 View FIGURES 1 – 9 , 17–18 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ); and (5) long and slender aedeagus, with pair(s) of apical or preapical processes or lamellae ( Figs 8–9 View FIGURES 1 – 9 , 19–21 View FIGURES 10 – 21 ).
Note. The generic name is feminine and combines the Greek prefix tetra -, which means four, with the suffix - lidia, a suffix common in the names of other genera of Neocoelidiinae . The name refers to the characteristic color pattern of the crown, with four orange maculae, a pair on anterior margin of the crown and the other close to posterior margin, adjacent to compound eyes.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |