Bulimus inflatus Lamarck, 1822
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.46290 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7376369 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E387D6-FFA2-FFDF-DEAF-F02BE71D0823 |
treatment provided by |
Diego |
scientific name |
Bulimus inflatus Lamarck, 1822 |
status |
|
Bulimus inflatus Lamarck, 1822 View in CoL
Fig. 30 View Figs 26-28
Bulimus inflatus Lamarck, 1822: 122 View in CoL (not Olivier, 1801). – Delessert, 1841: pl. 28 figs 1a-b. – Chenu, 1850 [1842- 1854]: pl. 9 figs 1a-b. – Mermod, 1951: 728, fig. 78. – Kendrick & Wilson, 1975: 307, pl. 3 figs 4a-b. – Breure & Whisson, 2012: 66 View Cited Treatment , fig. 5C.
Helix costulatus ‘Férussac’ Lamarck, 1822: 122 (in synonymy).
Type locality: [ Australia] “la Nouvelle-Hollande”.
Label: “?”, taxon label in Lamarck’s handwriting.
Dimensions: “Longueur, près d’un pouce [H ~ 27 mm]”; figured specimen herein H 26.0, D 15.6, W 5.4.
Type material: MHNG-INVE-51162 five syntypes (Lamarck coll.).
Remarks: Lamarck did not state on how many specimens his description was based. Kendrick & Wilson (1975) discussed at length the status of these two taxa and the confusion arisen in previous literature with Bothriembryon onslowi (Cox, 1864) . They convincingly showed that both Bulimus inflatus and Helix costulatus share the same type material, and the latter name is applicable for this taxon.
Current systematic position: Bothriembryontidae , Bothriembryon costulatus ( Lamarck, 1822) .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Bulimus inflatus Lamarck, 1822
Breure, Abraham S. H. 2016 |
Bulimus inflatus
Breure A. S. H. & Whisson C. S. 2012: 66 |
Kendrick G. W. & Wilson B. R. 1975: 307 |
Mermod G. 1951: 728 |
Lamarck J. P. B. 1822: 122 |
Helix costulatus
Lamarck J. P. B. 1822: 122 |