Hatschekia mihkagan, Uyeno, Daisuke & Nagasawa, Kazuya, 2010

Uyeno, Daisuke & Nagasawa, Kazuya, 2010, The copepod genus Hatschekia Poche, 1902 (Siphonostomatoida: Hatschekiidae) from triggerfishes (Pisces: Tetraodontiformes: Balistidae) from off the Ryukyu Islands, Japan, with descriptions of eleven new species, Zootaxa 2478, pp. 1-40 : 31-33

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.195334

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5693622

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E387F6-B408-FF89-91C8-FF021A61DF9F

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Hatschekia mihkagan
status

sp. nov.

Hatschekia mihkagan n. sp.

( Figs 133–147 View FIGURES 133 – 141 View FIGURES 142 – 147 )

Type material. Holotype, female ( NSMT –Cr 20916), ex Odonus niger (Rüppell) ( Tetraodontiformes : Balistidae ), off Sesoko-jima Island (26°37’N, 127°52’E), the Ryukyu Islands, East China Sea, Japan, 16 August 2006. Paratypes: 8 females ( NSMT –Cr 20917), ex O. niger , off Sesoko-jima Island (26°37’N, 127°52’E), the Ryukyu Islands, East China Sea, Japan, 16 August 2006; 3 females ( RUMF –ZC–00930), ex O. niger , off Sesoko-jima Island (26°37’N, 127°52’E), the Ryukyu Islands, East China Sea, Japan, 16 August 2006

Description of female. Body ( Figs 133–134 View FIGURES 133 – 141 ) 966–1261 (1113 ± 90) long, excluding caudal rami (n = 12). Cephalothorax ovoid with 2 lobes on frontal margin, indistinctly separated from trunk, shorter than wide [187–222 (200 ± 10) × 232–300 (257 ± 16)], with dorsal, double ring shaped, chitinous frame. Trunk fusiform, longer than wide [780–1064 (919 ± 88) × 235–336 (284 ± 28)] with posterior knobs. Urosome ( Fig. 135 View FIGURES 133 – 141 ) excluding caudal ramus shorter than wide [18–42 (33 ± 7) × 45–68 (59 ± 7)]. Genital complex fused to abdomen without border. Caudal ramus ( Fig. 135 View FIGURES 133 – 141 ) slightly longer than wide [12–21 (18 ± 2) × 8–12 (9 ± 1)], bearing 6 naked setae.

Rostrum with 1 round process at each posterolateral corner ( Fig. 136 View FIGURES 133 – 141 ). Antennule ( Fig. 136 View FIGURES 133 – 141 ) indistinctly 5- segmented, 87–104 (94 ± 6) long; armature formula: 8, 5, 4, 1, 13 + 1 aesthetasc. Antenna ( Fig. 137 View FIGURES 133 – 141 ) 3- segmented; proximal segment (coxa) unarmed; middle segment (basis) ornamented with surface pits; terminal claw with basal accessory element; proximal segment length 22–29 (26 ± 2); middle segment length 55–71 (64 ± 6); terminal claw length 18–25 (22 ± 2); total length 97–120 (112 ± 7). Parabasal papilla ( Fig. 138 View FIGURES 133 – 141 ) rodlike, as long as middle segment of antenna. Oral cone robust. Mandible ( Fig. 139 View FIGURES 133 – 141 ) slender, with 4 sharp apical teeth. Maxillule ( Fig. 140 View FIGURES 133 – 141 ) bilobate; both lobes armed with 2 tapering elements; elements on inner lobe shorter than on outer lobe. Maxilla ( Fig. 141 View FIGURES 133 – 141 ) 4-segmented; proximal segment unarmed; second segment rod-like, with 1 basal seta; third segment elongate, with 1 distal seta; terminal segment small, with 1 small seta and bifid claw. Maxilliped absent.

Legs 1 and 2 ( Figs 142–143 View FIGURES 142 – 147 ) biramous; both legs with exopod composed of 2 indistinct segments and 2- segmented endopod; leg armature formula as follows:

Leg 1 ( Fig. 142 View FIGURES 142 – 147 ) 58–64 (61 ± 2) long; protopod length 33–40 (36 ± 2); exopod length 18–29 (25 ± 3); endopod length 15–22 (20 ± 2). Leg 2 ( Fig. 143 View FIGURES 142 – 147 ) length 67–78 (72 ± 3); protopod length 36–46 (42 ± 3); exopod length 25–33 (30 ± 2); endopod length 24–31 (28 ± 2). Protopods of legs 1 and 2 ornamented with rows of blunt spinules on anterior surface. Both rami of legs 1 and 2 ornamented with semicircular membranes and fine rows of spinules.

Intercoxal sclerites of legs 1 and 2 ( Figs 144–145 View FIGURES 142 – 147 ) bearing 4 similar processes.

Leg 3 ( Fig. 146 View FIGURES 142 – 147 ) represented by 2 simple setae originating on mid-lateral line of surface of trunk. Leg 4 ( Fig. 147 View FIGURES 142 – 147 ) represented by 1 simple lateral seta on posterior of trunk.

Attachment site. Gill filaments.

Remarks. Hatschekia mihkagan n. sp. share the possession of 4 processes on the intercoxal sclerites of legs 1 and 2 with 10 species (see remarks of H. hemicyclium ) and 8 new species (i. e. H. churaumi n. sp., H. hemicyclium n. sp., H. izenaensis n. sp., H. jonesi n. sp., H. kabatai n. sp., H. mongarah n. sp., H. nakamurai n. sp. and H. zanpa n. sp.). Of these 18 species H. cylindrus and H. izenaensis n. sp. share a single seta on the endopod of leg 2 and the caudal ramus with 6 setae with the new species. Even though H. cylindrus resembles the new species, H. mihkagan n. sp. it differs from it in having a fusiform trunk (rather than a sausage-shaped trunk) with posterior knobs although the knobs are often very small and indistinct. Additionally, the new species has and a higher cephalothorax/body length ratio [0.18 ± 0.01 vs. 0.15 ± 0.01 (U-test; p <0.001), Table 1, see also table 1 in Uyeno & Nagasawa 2009b]. Hatschekia izenaensis n. sp. is easily distinguishable from the new species by having a trichotomous chitinous frame on the dorsal surface of the cephalothorax (instead of a double ring shaped frame), by the trunk having a constriction and by the presence of additional processes on the intercoxal sclerites of legs 1 and 2. It is uncertain in the original description of H. balistae (Nuñes- Ruivo 1954), whether a single seta is present on the first segment of the endopod of leg 2 as in the new species, but H. balistae differs from the new species by having a distinct apex on the cephalothorax.

Etymology. The new species name, mihkagan , refers to the similarity between the traditional swimming glasses in Okinawa and the chitinous frame on the cephalothorax of the new species.

NSMT

National Science Museum (Natural History)

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF