Curtonotum rinhatinana, Kirk-Spriggs, 2011

Kirk-Spriggs, Ashley H. & Wiegmann, Brian M., 2013, <p> <strong> A revision of Afrotropical Quasimodo flies (Diptera: Schizophora; Curtonotidae). Part IV — the continental Afrotropical species of <em> Curtonotum </ em> Macquart, with descriptions of thirteen new species and a combined phylogenetic analysis of the Curtonotidae </ strong> </ p>, Zootaxa 3684 (1), pp. 1-166 : 52-54

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3684.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E922034E-1247-400B-97F6-1778CF766B91

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E45152-FFAC-FFD0-A6AB-FE5C5120459C

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Curtonotum rinhatinana
status

 

1.2.11. Curtonotum rinhatinana View in CoL species-group

Species included: 1 (Afrotropical; confined to Madagascar).

Autapomorphy: Sclerotized sperm pump present (37). Curtonotum rinhatinana has a number of unique characters. Although similar in external characters to other species of the genus the bizarre structure of the basiphallus and the presence of a large sclerotised sperm pump, precludes it from any direct association and it is here tentatively ascribed to a species-group of its own. Its systematic position can only be fully assessed as part of a more extensive molecular study.

Systematics

Key to adult males of continental Afrotropical species of Curtonotum Macquart View in CoL

Examination of the male terminalia is required in all cases. For key to Malagasy species see Kirk-Spriggs (2011).

1. Frons (in profile) conspicuously projecting forwards at point of antennal insertion ( Figs 106–111 View FIGURES 106–111 , 155, 157, 159 View FIGURES 154–159 ), distinctly parallel-sided (viewed dorsally) ( Figs 130–135 View FIGURES 130–141 ); distiphallus subdivided into two elements: a baso-ventral process and apicodorsal process ( Figs 197–199 View FIGURES 191–202 , 224–227 View FIGURES 218–227 ); spermatheca either tubular, elongated and studded with fine protuberances ( Figs 210– 212 View FIGURES 203–217 ), or long, obclavate ( Figs 213–215 View FIGURES 203–217 ); usually much larger species, length ca.> 5 mm (although much smaller individuals are known).......................................................................................... 2

– Frons (in profile) not, or only marginally, projecting forwards at point of antennal insertion ( Figs 112–129 View FIGURES 112–117 View FIGURES 118–123 View FIGURES 124–129 ), distinctly narrower towards oral margin (viewed dorsally) ( Figs 136–153 View FIGURES 130–141 View FIGURES 142–153 ); either distiphallus with baso-ventral process developed into a short, blade-like, partially serrated process ( Figs 241–246 View FIGURES 238–246 , 251–258 View FIGURES 247–258 ), or formed of single undivided straight process ( Figs 262–267 View FIGURES 259–267 , 271–276 View FIGURES 268–276 , 280–285 View FIGURES 277–285 , 289–294 View FIGURES 286–294 ); spermatheca short, obclavate with folded and rugose surface ( Kirk-Spriggs 2008c, figs 1–65); usually much smaller species, length ca. <5 mm ............................................................ 7

2. Orbital plates short, extending less than ½ length of frons ( Figs 130–132 View FIGURES 130–141 ); orbital setae inserted close to one another in group proximal to vertex of frons ( Figs 106–108 View FIGURES 106–111 , 130–132 View FIGURES 130–141 , 154–159 View FIGURES 154–159 ); male sternite 6 quadrate, with 2 divergent medial setae ( Figs 191–193 View FIGURES 191–202 , dms); hypandrial arms extremely narrow ( Figs 194–196 View FIGURES 191–202 , hy); phallapodeme only partly fused to basiphallus; basiphallus with conspicuously projecting, but narrow “lateral wing”; distiphallus distinctly recurved ( Figs 197–202 View FIGURES 191–202 ); female cercus fused to tergite 10, with long terminal setulae ( Figs 203–206 View FIGURES 203–217 , t 10 View FIGURES 7–12 +ce); spermatheca tubular, elongated, studded with fine protuberances ( Figs 210–212 View FIGURES 203–217 )............................................. striatifrons View in CoL species-group 3 (p. 55)

– Orbital plates long, extending more than ⅔ length of frons ( Figs 133–135 View FIGURES 130–141 ); orbital setae widely-spaced, anterior orbital seta inserted more medially on frons ( Figs 109–111 View FIGURES 106–111 , 133–135 View FIGURES 130–141 ); male sternite 6 apically expanded, with U- or V-shaped apical excision, without divergent medial setae ( Figs 218–220 View FIGURES 218–227 ); hypandrial arms broad, with broad-based rounded-truncate dorsobasal lobe ( Figs 221–223 View FIGURES 218–227 , hy); phallapodeme fully fused to basiphallus; basiphallus with distinct lateral projection; distiphallus less strongly recurved ( Figs 224–227 View FIGURES 218–227 ); female cercus fused to tergite 10, distinctly spinose ( Figs 228–233 View FIGURES 228–233 , t 10 View FIGURES 7–12 +ce); spermatheca long, obclavate ( Figs 213–215 View FIGURES 203–217 )............................................. platyphallum View in CoL species-group 5 (p. 66)

3. Lateral wing of basiphallus with 2 basal projections (resembling a moose antler) ( Figs 197, 200 View FIGURES 191–202 , lw); male sternite 6 with extensive medial and lateral macula ( Fig. 191 View FIGURES 191–202 ); dm–cu crossvein as illustrated in Fig. 160 View FIGURES 160–165 ; spermatheca ( Fig. 210 View FIGURES 203–217 )......................................................................................... C. herrero Tsacas View in CoL (p. 61)

– Lateral wing of basiphallus either with single angulate lateral projection ( Fig. 201 View FIGURES 191–202 , lw), or without basal projections ( Fig. 202 View FIGURES 191–202 , lw); male sternite 6 either transverse with reduced lateral macula ( Fig. 192 View FIGURES 191–202 ), or quadrate without macula ( Fig. 193 View FIGURES 191–202 )........ 4

4. Lateral wing of basiphallus elongate, straight, wide basally, with single angulate baso-lateral projection ( Figs 198, 201 View FIGURES 191–202 , lw); male sternite 6 transverse with reduced lateral macula ( Fig. 192 View FIGURES 191–202 ); dm–cu crossvein as illustrated in Fig. 161 View FIGURES 160–165 ; stermathecae ( Fig. 211 View FIGURES 203–217 ).................................................................... C. maculiventris (Enderlein) View in CoL (p. 56)

– Lateral wing of basiphallus short, curved in apical ¼, wide basally, without lateral projections ( Figs 199, 202 View FIGURES 191–202 , lw); male sternite 6 quadrate, without maculae ( Fig. 193 View FIGURES 191–202 ); dm–cu crossvein as illustrated in Fig. 162 View FIGURES 160–165 ; stermathecae ( Fig. 212 View FIGURES 203–217 )........................................................................................ C. striatifrons Malloch View in CoL (p. 63)

5. Lateral margin of basiphallus with angulate, subrectangular extension ( Fig. 224 View FIGURES 218–227 ); male sternite 6 with lateral margins gently curved and U-shaped apical excision ( Fig. 218 View FIGURES 218–227 ); dm–cu crossvein as illustrated in Fig. 163 View FIGURES 160–165 ; spermatheca ( Fig. 213 View FIGURES 203–217 )......................................................................................... C. marriott sp. n. (p. 67)

– Lateral margin of basiphallus either with finger-like, evenly-rounded extension and serrated edge ( Figs 225, 226 View FIGURES 218–227 ), or with finger-like, evenly-rounded extension and shallow, wide apical excision ( Fig. 227 View FIGURES 218–227 ); male sternite 6 with lateral margins straight with V-shaped apical excision ( Figs 219, 220 View FIGURES 218–227 ); spermathecae ( Figs 214, 215 View FIGURES 203–217 )...................................... 6

6. Lateral margin of basiphallus with finger-like, extension and serrated edge ( Figs 225, 226 View FIGURES 218–227 ); male sternite 6 with shallow Vshaped apical excision ( Fig. 219 View FIGURES 218–227 ); dm–cu crossvein as illustrated in Fig. 164 View FIGURES 160–165 ; spermatheca ( Fig. 214 View FIGURES 203–217 )...................................................................................................... C. moffatt sp. n. (p. 70)

– Lateral margin of basiphallus with finger-like, evenly-rounded extension and shallow, wide apical excision ( Fig. 227 View FIGURES 218–227 ); male sternite 6 with narrow V-shaped apical excision ( Fig. 220 View FIGURES 218–227 ); dm–cu crossvein as illustrated in Fig. 165 View FIGURES 160–165 ; spermatheca ( Fig. 215 View FIGURES 203–217 )............................................................................ C. platyphallum Tsacas View in CoL (p. 72)

7. Lateral lobe of epandrium with 1 very strong seta and group of shorter setae ( Figs 238–240 View FIGURES 238–246 , 247–250 View FIGURES 247–258 ); distiphallus with basoventral process developed into a short, blade-like, partially hooked or serrated process ( Figs 241–246 View FIGURES 238–246 , 251–258 View FIGURES 247–258 )................................................................................ campsiphallum View in CoL species-group 8 (p. 74)

– Lateral lobe of epandrium with numerous strong setae of variable length ( Figs 259–261 View FIGURES 259–267 , 268–270 View FIGURES 268–276 , 277–279 View FIGURES 277–285 , 286–288 View FIGURES 286–294 ); distiphallus formed of single undivided straight process ( Figs 262–267 View FIGURES 259–267 , 271–276 View FIGURES 268–276 , 280–285 View FIGURES 277–285 , 289–294 View FIGURES 286–294 )................... 14

8. Basiphallus broad, expanded apically; baso-ventral process of distiphallus short or broad; membranous portion of distiphallus broad ( Figs 242, 245 View FIGURES 238–246 ; 251, 255; 253, 257; 254, 258 View FIGURES 247–258 ).......................................................... 9

– Basiphallus markedly narrowed apically; baso-ventral process of distiphallus elongate; membranous portion of distiphallus narrow ( Figs 241, 244; 243, 246 View FIGURES 238–246 ; 252, 256 View FIGURES 247–258 )............................................................... 12

9. Baso-ventral process of distiphallus reduced to a spur-like process ( Figs 253, 257 View FIGURES 247–258 ); male sternite 6 as illustrated in Fig. 300 View FIGURES 295–305 ; dm–cu crossvein as illustrated in Fig. 177.................................................. C View in CoL View FIGURES 172–181 . sao Tsacas (p. 89)

– Baso-ventral process of distiphallus more extensively developed, forming a plate with a row of more-or-less developed teethlike serrations on posterior margin ( Figs 242, 245 View FIGURES 238–246 ; 251, 255; 254, 258 View FIGURES 247–258 ).......................................... 10

10. Baso-ventral process of distiphallus subquadrate, with 3 teeth-like spines on posterior margin ( Figs 242, 245 View FIGURES 238–246 ); male sternite 6 as illustrated in Fig. 296 View FIGURES 295–305 ; dm–cu crossvein as illustrated in Fig. 173..................... C View in CoL View FIGURES 172–181 . campsiphallum Tsacas (p. 74)

– Baso-ventral process of distiphallus either subtriangular with 2 teeth-like spines on posterior margin, or semicircular with 3 prominent teeth-like spines on posterior margin ( Figs 251, 255; 254, 258 View FIGURES 247–258 ); dm–cu crossvein as illustrated in Figs 175, 178........ 11 View FIGURES 172–181 View FIGURES 7–12

11. Baso-ventral process of distiphallus subtriangular, with 2 teeth-like spines on posterior margin ( Figs 251, 255 View FIGURES 247–258 ); male sternite 6 as illustrated in Fig. 298 View FIGURES 295–305 ; dm–cu crossvein as illustrated in Fig. 175............................... C View FIGURES 172–181 . hay sp. n. (p. 84)

– Baso-ventral process of distiphallus semicircular with 3 prominent teeth-like spines on posterior margin ( Figs 254, 258 View FIGURES 247–258 ); male sternite 6 as illustrated in Fig. 301 View FIGURES 295–305 ; dm–cu crossvein as illustrated in Fig. 178.................... C View in CoL View FIGURES 172–181 . tsacas sp. n. (p. 93)

12. Baso-ventral process of distiphallus with distinct basal spine in addition to ventrally developed process ( Figs 241, 244 View FIGURES 238–246 ); male sternites 5 and 6 as illustrated in Fig. 295 View FIGURES 295–305 ; dm–cu crossvein as illustrated in Fig. 172........... C View in CoL View FIGURES 172–181 . angolense Tsacas (p. 79)

– Baso-ventral process of distiphallus without basal spine ( Figs 243, 246 View FIGURES 238–246 ; 252, 256 View FIGURES 247–258 ); dm–cu crossvein as illustrated in Figs 174, 176................................................................................................ 13 View FIGURES 172–181 View FIGURES 13–25

13. Baso-ventral process of distiphallus broad basally with one larger preapical spine and one smaller apical spine ( Figs 243, 246 View FIGURES 238–246 ); male sternites 5 and 6 as illustrated in Fig. 297 View FIGURES 295–305 ; dm–cu crossvein as illustrated in Fig. 174......... C View FIGURES 172–181 . freidberg sp. n. (p. 82)

– Baso-ventral process of distiphallus large and widely separated from distiphallus, arc-shaped, with 3 or 4 long spines on anterior margin preapically and apically ( Figs 252, 256 View FIGURES 247–258 ); male sternites 5 and 6 as illustrated in Fig. 299 View FIGURES 295–305 ; dm–cu crossvein as illustrated in Fig. 176........................................................... C View in CoL View FIGURES 172–181 . quinquevittatum Curran (p. 86)

14. Male sternite 5 laterally expanded, sternites 4–5 with modified setae ( Fig. 302 View FIGURES 295–305 ); hypandrium with dorsal extension of dorsobasal lobe long and narrow ( Fig. 259 View FIGURES 259–267 ); basiphallus with expanded, subdivided mid section and cordiform extension of distiphallus ( Figs 262, 265 View FIGURES 259–267 )..................................... gonzo View in CoL species-group (1 species: C. gonzo View in CoL sp. n) (p. 94)

– Male sternite 5 not laterally expanded, sternites 4–5 with unmodified setae; hypandrium with dorsal extension of dorsobasal lobe short and broad ( Figs 260, 261 View FIGURES 259–267 , 268–270 View FIGURES 268–276 , 277–279 View FIGURES 277–285 , 286–288 View FIGURES 286–294 ); basiphallus undivided, distiphallus without cordiform extension ( Figs 263, 266; 264, 267 View FIGURES 259–267 ; 271–276 View FIGURES 268–276 , 280–285 View FIGURES 277–285 , 289–294 View FIGURES 286–294 ).............................................. 15

15. Basiphallus with long, obliquely angled, posteriorly-directed spine basally ( Figs 263, 266; 264, 267 View FIGURES 259–267 ); male sternite 6 as illustrated in Figs 303, 304 View FIGURES 295–305 ..................................................... saheliense View in CoL species-group 16 (p. 97)

– Basiphallus with 1 or 2 dorsally-directed basal spines ( Figs 271–276 View FIGURES 268–276 , 280–285 View FIGURES 277–285 , 289–294 View FIGURES 286–294 ); male sternite 6 as illustrated in Fig. 305 View FIGURES 295–305 (for C. uncinatum View in CoL sp. n.)............................................... uncinatum View in CoL species-group 17 (p. 103)

16. Basal region of distiphallus (viewed dorsally) with small spine on right side, widely separated from junction of basiphallus and distiphallus ( Fig. 266 View FIGURES 259–267 ); male sternite 6 with shallow U-shaped apical excision ( Fig. 303 View FIGURES 295–305 ); dm–cu crossvein as illustrated in Fig. 180.......................................................................... C View in CoL View FIGURES 172–181 . saheliense Tsacas (p. 100)

– Basal region of distiphallus (viewed dorsally) with small spine on left margin near junction of basiphallus and distiphallus, immediately below base of prominent elongated spine on basiphallus ( Fig. 267 View FIGURES 259–267 ); male sternite 6 with deeper V-shaped apical excision ( Fig. 304 View FIGURES 295–305 ); dm–cu crossvein as illustrated in Fig. 181................................ C View FIGURES 172–181 . simile Tsacas (p. 97)

17. Extreme apex of dorsal edge of basiphallus developed into an apical spine or hook ( Figs 281, 284; 282, 285 View FIGURES 277–285 ).......... 18

– Extreme apex of dorsal edge of basiphallus evenly-rounded, not developed into spine or hook ( Figs 271–276 View FIGURES 268–276 ; 280, 283 View FIGURES 277–285 ; 289– 294 View FIGURES 286–294 )............................................................................................... 19

18. Extreme apex of dorsal edge of basiphallus developed into an apical hook or extension; more apical dorsal spine of distiphallus broad basally with straight edges ( Figs 281, 284 View FIGURES 277–285 ), with additional much smaller spine towards apex (not visible on Fig. 284 View FIGURES 277–285 ); dm–cu crossvein obliquely angled with medial bend ( Fig. 186 View FIGURES 182–190 )............................. C. litoralis View in CoL sp. n. (p. 117)

– Extreme apex of dorsal edge of basiphallus developed into an acute apical spine ( Figs 282, 285 View FIGURES 277–285 ); more apical dorsal spine of distiphallus with edges very slightly angled, acutely pointed, much smaller spine towards apex absent; dm–cu crossvein less obliquely angled, medial bend less apparent ( Fig. 187 View FIGURES 182–190 )................................... C. mcgregor View in CoL sp. n. (p. 119)

19. Dorsal spines of distiphallus very weakly developed; basal spine only visible in lateral view ( Figs 289, 292 View FIGURES 286–294 ); dm–cu crossvein as illustrated ( Fig. 188 View FIGURES 182–190 )............................................................ C. pauliani Tsacas View in CoL (p. 121)

– At least more apical dorsal spine of distiphallus well-developed ( Figs 271–276 View FIGURES 268–276 ; 280, 283 View FIGURES 277–285 ; 290–294 View FIGURES 286–294 ); dm–cu crossvein as illustrated ( Figs 182–185; 189; 190 View FIGURES 182–190 )......................................................................... 20

20. Basal spine of distiphallus developed into a distinct, straight, dorsally-directed hook-like process ( Figs 290, 293 View FIGURES 286–294 ); dm–cu crossvein as illustrated in Fig. 189...................................................... C View in CoL View FIGURES 182–190 . uncinatum sp. n. (p. 103)

– Basal spine of distiphallus not developed into a distinct dorsally-directed hook ( Figs 271–276 View FIGURES 268–276 ; 280, 283 View FIGURES 277–285 ; 291, 294 View FIGURES 286–294 ); dm–cu crossvein as illustrated in Figs 182–185, 190............................................................. 21 View FIGURES 182–190 View FIGURES 13–25

21. Basal spine of distiphallus either forming a long, straight, erect spine ( Figs 271, 274 View FIGURES 268–276 ), or a medium-sized, upright, slightly curved and posteriorly-directed spine ( Figs 280, 283 View FIGURES 277–285 ); dm–cu crossvein as illustrated in Figs 182, 185................. 22 View FIGURES 182–190

– Basal spine of distiphallus short or absent ( Figs 272–276 View FIGURES 268–276 , 291, 294 View FIGURES 286–294 ); dm–cu crossvein as illustrated in Figs 183, 184, 190.. 23 View FIGURES 182–190

22. Basal spine of distiphallus forming a long, straight, erect spine ( Figs 271, 274 View FIGURES 268–276 ); dm–cu crossvein as illustrated in Fig. 182.................................................................................... C View in CoL View FIGURES 182–190 . bicuspis sp. n. (p. 108)

– Basal spine of distiphallus forming a medium-sized, upright, slightly curved and posteriorly-directed spine ( Figs 280, 283 View FIGURES 277–285 ); dm–cu crossvein as illustrated in Fig. 185.......................................... C View in CoL View FIGURES 182–190 . cuthbertsoni Duda (p. 114)

23. Basal spine of distiphallus partially subdivided into one strongly and one weakly sclerotised short blades ( Figs 273, 276 View FIGURES 268–276 ); dm– cu crossvein as illustrated in Fig. 184............................................... C View in CoL View FIGURES 182–190 . constance sp. n. (p. 113)

– Basal spine of distiphallus very short or absent, not subdivided ( Figs 272, 275 View FIGURES 268–276 ; 291, 294 View FIGURES 286–294 ); dm–cu crossvein as illustrated in Figs 183, 190........................................................................................ 24 View FIGURES 182–190 View FIGURES 13–25

24. More apical spine of distiphallus relatively broad basally and sharp; basal spine very short, but erect and sharp ( Figs 272, 275 View FIGURES 268–276 ); dm–cu crossvein as illustrated in Fig. 183............................................. C View in CoL View FIGURES 182–190 . cimbebas sp. n. (p. 112)

– More apical spine of distiphallus relatively narrow and blunt; basal spine absent ( Figs 291, 294 View FIGURES 286–294 ); dm–cu crossvein as illustrated in Fig. 190...................................................................... C View in CoL View FIGURES 182–190 . unicuspis sp. n. (p. 122)

Genus Curtonotum Macquart, 1844 View in CoL

CURTONOTUM: Macquart 1844: 350 View in CoL (193). Type species: Musca gibba Fabricius, 1805 [preoccupied], by original designation. [The name of the Type species is a junior primary homonym preoccupied by Musca gibba Müller, 1776: 175 and M. gibba Rossi, 1794: 73 . Curtonotum taeniatum Hendel, 1913: 629 View in CoL was accepted as the replacement name by Thompson and Pont (1993)].

CYRTONOTUM Agassiz, 1846: 108 . Unjustified emendation of Curtonotum Macquart, 1844 View in CoL .

DIPLOCENTRA Loew, 1862: 13 . [Unnecessary] new replacement name for Curtonotum Macquart, 1844 View in CoL .

SELIACANTHA Bezzi, 1895: 66. Nomen nudum , attributed to Rondani and proposed in synonymy (with Diplocentra Loew, 1862 ). Name from a collection label. Also Bezzi (1902: 192).

SELIDACANTHA Bezzi, 1895: 66 . Nomen nudum , proposed as an emendation of the likewise unavailable Seliacantha Bezzi, 1895: 66. Also Bezzi (1902: 192).

Diagnosis

Small to medium-sized (1.9–7.7 mm), distinctly robust, hunchbacked flies. Greyish to brown, often with vitae on thorax and pigment patterns on abdomen. Head: compound eye probably green-brown iridescent in living examples, in profile gently and evenly rounded anteriorly, slightly triangularly produced posteriorly; 2 pairs of long, prominent fronto-orbital setae, the anterior pair proclinate, the posterior pair reclinate, with a minute reclinate seta positioned between them, close to base of posterior orbital setae socket; frons wide in both sexes. Arista plumose with long dorsal and ventral branches. Thorax: mesonotum moderately convex, very slightly flattened behind head, with multiple rows of regular, short, black, overlapping setulae; 1 pair of strong dorsocentral setae and one pair of acrostichal setae; anepisternum with 2–3 long setae and some short setulae; one very long katepisternal seta accompanied by a short dorsal one. Scutellum: disk entirely clothed in setulae, with 2 pairs of strong marginal setae. Wing: greyish to grey-brown infuscate, dm–cu crossvein usually markedly infuscate; costa (c) with humeral and subcostal breaks and subcosta complete, with a variable number of prominent costal spines beyond R 1 longer and stronger than adjacent vestiture. Legs: all tibiae with preapical dorsal setae; fore femur with row of short, but strong spinules posteroventrally along distal ½ or ⅓, variable in number. Abdomen: long, cylindrical, telescopic, generally pale in colour with brown maculae or T-shaped lateral markings. Phallapodeme, basiphallus and distiphallus fused or articulated and asymmetrical, forming C-shaped structure. Female abdomen with tubular ovipositor, cerci sometimes fused, with spine-like setae or setulae. Spermathecae flattened, short and obclavate with a folded or rugose surface, or long, tubular and studded with protuberances.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Curtonotidae

Genus

Curtonotum

Loc

Curtonotum rinhatinana

Kirk-Spriggs, Ashley H. & Wiegmann, Brian M. 2013
2013
Loc

SELIDACANTHA

Bezzi, M. 1902: 192
Bezzi, M. 1895: 66
Bezzi, M. 1895: 66
1895
Loc

DIPLOCENTRA

Loew, H. 1862: 13
1862
Loc

CYRTONOTUM

Agassiz, L. 1846: 108
1846
Loc

CURTONOTUM: Macquart 1844: 350

Hendel, F. 1913: 629
Macquart, J. 1844: 350
Rossi, P. 1794: 73
Muller, O. F. 1776: 175
1844
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF