Ecdyonurus (Rhithrogeniella)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5319.4.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:20272586-E197-4DEA-811F-496572F121B7 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8211537 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E48787-FFD0-E640-FF64-FC818946FABD |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ecdyonurus (Rhithrogeniella) |
status |
|
Ecdyonurus (Rhithrogeniella) sp. 2
( Figs 103–109 View FIGURES 103–110 , 111–116 View FIGURES 111–116 )
Material examined. INDIA, state Kerala, Erumeli, river Koratty , 20.I.2016, coll. N. Kluge & L. Sheyko: 4 S-I♂, 2 S♂, 1 S ♀ .
Characteristics
Larva. Unknown.
Winged stages. Similar to E. (Rh.) ornatus . Male and female subimago differ from E. (Rh.) ornatus by contrasting dark brown ventral ark of prealar bridge ( Figs 107–109 View FIGURES 103–110 ) [in contrast to narrowly colored with lighter brown in E. (Rh.) ornatus — Fig. 110 View FIGURES 103–110 ]. Male imago differs from E. (Rh.) ornatus and other species by penis lobes closely brought together ( Figs 111, 113–114 View FIGURES 111–116 ). Hypodermal coloration of abdominal terga of male and female imago and subimago is more composite than in E. (Rh.) ornatus ( Figs 104–106 View FIGURES 103–110 ).
Egg. Chorion is densely and irregularly covered with roundish papilla and fewer knob-terminated coiled thread ( KTC); micropiles wide and roundish ( Figs 115–116 View FIGURES 111–116 ). In contrast to E. (Rh.) ornatus , net-like relief or its traces are completely absent.
Dimension. Fore wing length 4–5 mm.
KTC |
Pedagogical University |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |