Mymaridae

Huber, John T., Read, Jennifer D. & Triapitsyn, Serguei V., 2007, Paranaphoidea Girault 1913, Zootaxa 1596, pp. 1-111 : 15-19

Key to genera of Australian Mymaridae . Males.

(Antenna without clava; with flagellum of 8–11 segments similar in width. In Anagrus -group genera the apical two flagellomeres are usually widely joined together, clava-like, but are not wider than the preceding segments)

Note: Mymarid males are less common than females. Males of Cybomymar , Eofoersteria , Polynemoidea and Parastethynium are unknown or ( Dicopomorpha ) exceedingly rare and therefore not included in the key. Males of several genera have not yet been found in the Australian fauna but are likely to be present so they are included in the key.

1 Tarsi 5-segmented ( Figs. 140–142 )....................................................................................................... 2

- Tarsi 4-segmented ( Figs. 209–211 ) or, exceptionally ( Kikiki ), 3-segmented ( Figs. 155, 156 )...........11

2(1) Flagellum 11-segmented ( Figs. 58 , 136 ) ............................................................................................. 3

- Flagellum at most 10-segmented ( Figs. 12 , 93 , 103)............................................................................7

3(2) Fore wing venation at least half wing length, usually much more ( Figs. 44, 55 , 131)......................... 4

- Fore wing venation less than half wing length ( Figs. 135 , 143 ) ............................. Gonatocerus Nees

4(3) Flagellomeres each with at least 10 longitudinal sensilla ( Fig. 133) ........... Eustochomorpha Girault (Note: Male of Eustochomorpha haeckeli is unknown; males that key here are conspecific with females of undescribed species having a 3-segmented funicle)

- Flagellomeres each with at most 5 longitudinal sensilla ...................................................................... 5

5(4) Flagellomeres with setae long, about twice length of flagellomere ( Fig. 175 ); protibial spur (calcar) comb-like along inner margin ( Figs. 172, 176 ) ........................................ Myrmecomymar Yoshimoto

- Flagellomeres with setae normal, shorter than length of flagellomere ( Fig. 66 ); protibial spur (calcar) smooth along inner margin ( Fig. 67 ).....................................................................................................6

6(5) Propodeum medially with H-shaped pattern of carinae ( Fig. 59 ) ........................ Boudiennyia Girault

- Propodeum without such a pattern of carinae .............................................................. Arescon Walker

7(2) Gaster with petiole distinct, narrow (less than one third width of propodeal apex) and slightly longer than wide; mesophragma not projecting into gaster ( Fig. 65 )..............................................................8

- Gaster broadly joined to propodeum, the propodeal foramen over half as wide as propodeal apex or gaster, and gastral petiole much shorter than wide, ring-like ( Fig. 164); mesophragma projecting into gaster ( Fig. 9 ) ........................................................................................................................................ 9

8(7) Fore wing not curved apically, the posterior margin straight so wing widening slightly towards apex (wider than in female, Fig. 71 ); wing blade with dark and light pattern and with numerous microtrichia (as in female, Fig. 71 ); propodeum with distinct reticulate sculpture .............................................. ...................................................................................................................... Camptopteroides Viggiani

- Fore wing curved apically, the posterior margin concave and paralleling anterior margin; wing blade hyaline and usually with few microtrichia, often in single median row ( Fig. 60 ); propodeum without sculpture or with faint reticulate sculpture and sometimes with carinae ............. Camptoptera Förster

9(7) Flagellum ( Fig. 12 ) 8 or 9-segmented, rarely with an additional minute ring segment between segments 1 and 2 ........................................................................................................... Alaptus Westwood

- Flagellum 10-segmented ( Figs. 103, 159) ......................................................................................... 10

10(9) Fore wing extremely narrow medially, with posterior margin slightly and evenly concave along much of its length, and with few microtrichia on blade ( Fig. 101); posterior scutellum shorter than anterior scutellum and not divided medially by longitudinal suture .......................................... Dicopus Enock

- Fore wing wider medially, the posterior margin concave mainly towards apex ( Fig. 158), and often with several rows of microtrichia on blade; posterior scutellum longer than anterior scutellum and divided by mediolongitudinal suture ( Fig. 164) ................................. Mimalaptus Noyes & Valentine

11(1) Tarsi 3-segmented ( Figs. 155, 156 ); flagellum 9-segmented ( Fig. 154 )...... Kikiki Huber & Beardsley

- Tarsi 4-segmented ( Fig. 231 ); flagellum usually 11-segmented ( Fig. 232 ) but sometimes 10- or 9-segmented.................................................................................................................................................12

12(11) Propodeum with longitudinal submedian pair of tall, translucent, areolate carinae ( Fig. 235 ) and propodeal seta branched; gastral tergum 1 anteriorly with sublateral pair of translucent, areolate carinae ( Fig. 233 )................................................................................................ Ptilomymar Annecke & Doutt

- Propodeum and gaster without such carinae and propodeal seta not branched; gastral tergum 1 without carinae ........................................................................................................................................... 13

13(12) Gaster petiolate, the petiole tube-like, slightly to considerably longer than wide ( Figs. 23 , 192 ); mesophragma not projecting into gaster ( Figs. 23 , 191 ); body often well sclerotized, the head and metasoma non-collapsing when air-dried ( Figs. 23 , 191 ); scutellum usually not clearly divided into anterior and posterior scutellum and often with a transverse row of fovea in posterior half ( Figs. 191 , 215 ).....................................................................................................................................................14

- Gaster appearing sessile, the petiole ring-like, wider than long, either about half as wide as apex of propodeum and barely recognizable ( Fig. 212 ) or narrower, about one-third width of propodeal apex, and distinguishable ( Fig. 39 ); mesophragma usually projecting a least slightly into gaster ( Fig. 212 ); body often poorly sclerotized, the head and metasoma collapsing when air-dried; scutellum often clearly divided into anterior and posterior scutellum ( Fig. 273 ) but usually without a transverse row of fovea....................................................................................................................................................24

14(13) Mandibles pointing ventrally, not crossing each other medially (mandibular condyles transverse, so mandibles move forewards and backwards) ( Figs. 23, 26 ), with several, small teeth on ventral surface ( Figs. 22 , 126 ); hind wing relatively wide, with rounded apex ( Figs. 21 , 123 ) and membrane extending narrowly to base of venation ( Fig. 123 ); protibial spur (calcar) comb-like along inner margin ( Figs. 25 , 125 ).....................................................................................................................................15

- Mandibles pointing towards each other, crossing each other medially (mandibular condyles in line with long axis of body, so mandibles move in and out), with usually three equal, normal-sized teeth on inner surface ( Figs. 150 , 220, 265 ); hind wing width and apex various, but its membrane beginning towards apex of venation so venation without membrane for at least half its length ( Fig. 1 ); protibial spur not comb-like on inner surface ( Fig. 17 )..................................................................................... 16

15(14) Head in lateral view only slightly triangular, not longer than high and with small projection between toruli ( Fig. 23 ); mandible not longer than width of mouth opening ( Fig. 26 ) ....... Anagroidea Girault

- Head in lateral view strongly and sharply triangular ( Fig. 126 ), much longer than high and with large, distinct shelf projecting between toruli ( Fig. 124 ); mandible as long as head height ( Fig. 126 )............ ......................................................................................... Eubroncus Yoshimoto, Kozlov & Trjapitzin

16(14) Fore wing oar-shaped, with a long, narrow petiole and short, oval, partly infuscate blade; hind wing filamentous, very short ( Fig. 165) to almost 2/3 as long as fore wing; toruli at extreme dorsolateral angle of face, touching transverse trabecula (a transverse, thickened bar of dark cuticle) separating face from vertex; scape constricted medially ( Fig. 166) ................................................. Mymar Curtis

- Fore wing not oar-shaped; hind wing not filamentous, though sometimes membrane very narrow ( Fig. 237); toruli usually lower on face, separated from trabecula by at least half a torulus diameter ( Fig. 5 ), but sometimes at extreme dorsolateral angle; scape not constricted medially ( Figs. 5, 6 ) ................ 17

17(16) Petiole attached to gastral tergum ....................................................................................................... 18

- Petiole attached to gastral sternum .................................................................................................... 20

18(17) Face with small pit submedially next to each torulus ( Fig. 150 ) .................... Himopolynema Taguchi

- Face without a pit submedially next to each torulus ( Figs. 5 , 214 ) .................................................... 19

19(18) Propleura abutting each other anteriorly along midline, the prosterum thus closed anteriorly ( Fig. 191 ); fore wing usually narrow and often slightly narrowing just beyond apex of venation ( Fig. 77 ) but sometimes wider ( Fig. 190 ); propodeum without carinae ...................... Palaeoneura Waterhouse

- Propleura not abutting anteriorly along midline, the prosternum thus open anteriorly; fore wing usually wider just beyond apex of venation than at marginal vein; propodeum with at least an incomplete median carina [but smooth in the introduced P. saga (Girault) ] ............................. Polynema Haliday

20(17) Fore wing very narrow basally and very wide distally, usually with two or three wide transverse brown bands ( Fig. 237); hind wing very narrow and about half as long as fore wing ( Fig. 237); head and thorax (except metathorax) with distinct, areolate sculpture ............................. Richteria Girault

- Wings not as above, fore wing usually without bands but, if banded, head and thorax at most with inconspicuous, reticulate sculpture; hind wing almost as long as fore wing ( Figs. 1 , 77 , 248 ) even when very narrow................................................................................................................................21

21(20) Vertex with wide, shallow depression outside each ocellus ( Fig. 252 ); scape with imbricate (rasplike) sulpture on inner surface ( Figs. 247, 252 ); prothoracic spiracle advanced forward, near anterior apex of notauli ( Fig. 253 ); propodeum without median carina ...................................... Stephanodes Enock

- Vertex usually without a depression outside each ocellus ( Fig. 150 ); scape at most with fine reticulate sculpture on inner surface ( Fig. 5 ); prothoracic spiracle at posterolateral angle of pronotum ( Figs. 191 , 215 ); propodeum with median or submedian carinae.........................................................................22

22(21) Face without a pit submedially next to each torulus ( Fig. 5 ); propodeum either with V-shaped submedian carinae ( Fig. 3 ) or with a complete median carina......................................................................23

- Face with a submedian pit next to each torulus; propodeum with subparallel submedian carinae, these often incomplete, present at posterior margin of propodeum only ......................................................... ...................................................................................... Boccacciomymar S. Triapitsyn & Berezovskiy

23(22) Propodeum with V-shaped, submedian carinae ( Fig. 3 ) ................................ Acmopolynema Ogloblin

- Propodeum with a single, complete median carina .................................. Agalmopolynema Ogloblin

24(13) Wings very short, not extending past propodeum ( Figs. 107, 182, 202) or wings absent..................25

- Wings well developed, extending at least to apex of gaster ( Figs. 105, 198) .................................... 26

25(24) Head in lateral view angular, strongly receding from toruli towards mouth margin. Cleruchus Enock

- Head in lateral view slightly bulging but not strongly receding towards mouth margin ........................ Nesopatasson Valentine

26(24) Posterior scutellum divided medially by a longitudinal sulcus (sometimes only in partly divided in some Omyomymar specimens) ( Figs. 212 , 246 , 273 , 283 ); gaster appearing sessile with only a slight dorsal or lateral constriction between mesosoma and metasoma, the extremely short petiole about half as wide as apex of propodeum or gastral tergum 1 and barely recognizable or distinguishable from gastral tergum 1; mesophragma usually projecting at least slightly into metasoma ( Figs. 20 , 30 , 185, 212 , 246 , 283 ) .................................................................................................................................... 27

- Posterior scutellum entire; gaster appearing subsessile, with a distinct dorsal and lateral constriction between mesosoma and metasoma, the petiole ring-like, about one-third width of propodeal apex at junction with propodeum (but over half as wide in Cleruchoides ) and usually easily distinguishable from gastral tergum 1 ( Figs. 39 , 52 , 120 , 224 , 273 ); mesophragma not projecting into gaster or scarcely so ........................................................................................................................................... 32

27(26) Scape with numerous short, stout setae covering inner surface ( Fig. 187); gena in lateral view massive, twice width of relatively small eye ............................................................. Omyomymar Schauff

- Scape without setae on inner surface or, if with setae ( Allanagrus ), these longer, thin and hair-like; gena in lateral view narrower, less than twice width of eye, the eye of normal size..........................28

28(27) Protibial spur comb-like, with row of sete along inner margin in addition to apical bifurcation ( Fig. 32 ); fore wing narrow, especially just beyond venation ( Figs. 32, 33 ) ...................... Anagrus Haliday

- Protibial spur not comb-like; fore wing wider ................................................................................... 29

29(28) Genitalia not encapsulated in saclike phallobase, asymmetrical ( Fig. 259, and fig. 3 in Viggiani 1989); fore wing characteristically shaped, with a distinct, rounded lobe behind venation, narrowing just beyond venation, then widening evenly towards rounded to slightly pointed apex ............................... ................................................................................................................................... Stethynium Enock

- Genitalia encapsulated in saclike phallobase, symmetrical ( Fig. 208 ); fore wing without a distinct lobe behind venation ( Fig. 206 )...........................................................................................................30

30(29) Hind wing often extremely wide or, if relatively narrow, wider apically than basally and with rounded apex ( Fig. 206 ) .................................................................................................. Paranaphoidea Girault

- Hind wing normal, not unusually narrow or wide, and somewhat pointed apically ( Figs. 14 , 242 )..31

31(30) Face with subantennal grooves extending to mouth margin ( Fig. 16 ); scape with numerous hairlike setae on inner surface; mesophragma in dorsal view rounded apically ( Fig. 20 ) ................................... ............................................................................................................... Allanagrus Noyes & Valentine

- Face without subantennal grooves; scape without setae but with transverse striations on inner surface; mesophragma in dorsal view notched apically (as in Fig. 212 )..................... Schizophragma Ogloblin

32(26) Fore wing venation at least half wing length, the marginal vein at least as long as submarginal vein ( Figs. 49 , 198).....................................................................................................................................33

- Fore wing venation at most 0.4 wing length, the marginal vein distinctly shorter than submarginal vein ..................................................................................................................................................... 34

33(32) Fore wing usually with a more or less defined oblique line of microtrichia extending from apex of venation to posterior margin of wing at about one-quarter wing length from wing apex ( Fig. 49 ) or, if microtrichia row absent, a fold present ............................................................ Australomymar Girault

- Fore wing without such a line of microtrichia or fold ................ Paracmotemnus Noyes & Valentine

34(32) Fore wing venation about 0.4 wing length and with curved brown suffusion behind relatively long marginal vein, and apex of blade symmetrically rounded ( Fig. 225) ..................................................... ......................................................................................................... Pseudanaphes Noyes & Valentine

- Fore wing venation usually shorter and usually without suffusion as above, though sometimes with brown bands beyond venation, but if as above then apex of blade often at least slightly asymmetrical..............................................................................................................................................................35

35(34) Head in lateral view with face rounded to flat, barely receding from toruli to mouth margin; toruli directed forward..................................................................................................................................36

- Head in lateral view with face angular, strongly receding from toruli to mouth margin; toruli often directed obliquely upward...................................................................................................................39

36(35) Pronotum entire ......................................................................................................... Anaphes Haliday

- Pronotum longitudinally divided medially (by distinct suture or pale line) into two lobes ............... 37

37(36) Scape with strong, isodiametric cellulate sculpture on inner surface ( Fig. 263 ) .................................... Kompsomymar Lin & Huber , gen. nov.

- Scape at most only faintly sculptured on inner surface ..................................................................... 38

38(37) Head in lateral view thin, the gena very narrow so posterior margin of eye, at least dorsally, touching or almost touching back of head ............................................................................. Erythmelus Enock

- Head in lateral view relatively thick, the gena relatively wide, so posterior margin of eye separated along entire length from back of head .......................................................... Dorya Noyes & Valentine

39(35) Flagellar segments at least 2.5X as long as wide ( Fig. 74 ) ............. Ceratanaphes Noyes & Valentine

- Flagellar segments shorter, at least some not much longer than wide ( Fig. 85 ) ................................ 40

40(39) Fore wing blade entirely covered with microtrichia ( Figs. 223 , 274) .................... Prionaphes Gahan

- Fore wing blade with one or two rows of microtrichia but otherwise bare ( Fig 88 ) ......................... 41

41(40) Fore wing parallel-sided or almost so, knife-like, at least 8X as long as wide, and posterior margin with weak lobe behind apex of venation ( Fig. 88 ) .................................................... Cleruchus Enock

- Fore wing with anterior and posterior margins diverging, about 6X as long as wide, and posterior margin distinctly lobed behind apex of venation ( Fig. 269 ) ...... Cleruchoides Lin & Huber , gen. nov.

Figures

FIGURES 135–142. Gonatocerus, litoralis group spp. Male (Tas., 3 km NE by E Wayatinah, 42.22°S 146.29°E, 23.i.1983, I. Naumann & J. Cardale) 135, fore- and hind wings; 136, antenna; 137, genitalia. Female (Tas., 12 km NNE. Bronte Park, 42.02°S 146.33°E, 20.i.1983, I. Naumann & J. Cardale) 138, antenna; 139, metanotum and propodeum; 140, fore leg; 141, middle leg; 142, hind leg.

FIGURES 205–212. Paranaphoidea spp. Female (NSW, Barrington Tops State Forest, Polblue Swamp, 31.57°S 151.25°E, 17.xi.1981, T. Weir) 205, antenna. Male (NSW, Millpost near Bungendore, S. Rozario, 35.18°S 149.23°E, 6.i.19?, ex. Eurymeloides punctata) 206, fore- and hind wings; 207, antenna; 208, genitalia; 209, fore leg; 210, middle leg; 211, hind leg. Male (ACT, Canberra, ii.1946, E.F. Riek) 212, body dorsal.

FIGURES 153–157. Kikiki sp. Male (WA, ca. 3 km W. Walpole, 34°59.01’S 116º40.76’E, 20–21.xi.2002, J. George, D. Hawks, J. Munro, A. Owen) 153, fore-and hind wings; 154, antenna; 155, fore leg; 156, protarsus; 157, genitalia lateral.

FIGURES 54–59. Boudiennyia sp. Female (NSW, 16 km NE. Wiangaree, 600m, Sheepstation Creek, 13.vi– 24.viii.1982, S. & J. Peck) 54, fore leg; 55, fore- and hindwings; 56, antenna. Male (NSW, 14 km W. Urbenville, Tooloom Plateau, 28.29°S 152.24°E, 14.ii.1984, I.D. Naumann) 57, genitalia dorsal; 58, antenna; 59, metasoma dorsal.

FIGURES 7–13. Alaptus spp. Female (Qld, Heathlands, 11.45°S 142.35°E, 26.i–29.ii.1992, P. Feehney) 7, fore- and hind wings; 8, antenna; 9, body. Male (ACT, Blundells Creek, 3 km E. Piccadilly Circus, 850m, 35.22S 148.50E, xii.1984, Weir, Lawrence, Johnson) 10, genitalia dorsal. Male (Qld, 12 km SSE. Heathlands, 11.52°S 142.38°E, 22.iii– 25.iv.1992, T. Mcleod) 11, genitalia lateral; 12, antenna; 13, fore leg.

FIGURES 92–98. Dicopomorpha spp. Male (ACT, 6 km NE Piccadilly Circus, Wombat Creek, 35.195ºS 148.51ºE, 750m, 10–15.ix.1984, T. Weir, J. Lawrence & M.-L. Johnson) 92, fore- and hind wings; 93, antenna. Male (Qld, 12 km SSE Heathlands, 11.51ºS 142.38ºE, 26.i–iii.1992, P. Feehney) 94, genitalia lateral; 95, body. Male (same data as Heathlands specimen, above), 96, genitalia ventral. Female (Tas., 3 km S Mt. Oakleigh, Pelion Hut, 41.50ºS 146.03ºE, 30.xi.90–8.i.1991, W.E.B.S.) 97, antenna; 98, fore leg.

FIGURES 143–146. Gonatocerus, sulphuripes group spp. Female (Qld, Hann River, 15.11°S 143.52°E, 20.iii– 24.iv.1994, P. Zborowski) 143, fore-and hind wings; 144, antenna; 145, metanotum and propodeum dorsolateral. Male (Qld, 13 km E. by S. Weipa, 12.40°S 143.00°E, 16.xii.93–16.i.1994, P. Zborowski & D. Khalu) 146, antenna.

FIGURES 170–178. Myrmecomymar sp. Female (Qld, Massey Creek, 17.37°S 145.34°E, 1000m, 3.x.–2.xi.1995, L. Umback) 170, gaster lateral; 171, antenna; 172, fore leg; 173, mesosoma (crushed). Male (Qld, Lake Eacham Nat. Park, 17.17°S 145.37°E, 760m, 3–7.xi.1976, R.W. Taylor & T.A. Weir) 174, fore- and hind wings; 175, antenna; 176, protibial spur and tarsomere 1; 177, genitalia; 178, mesosoma.

FIGURES 66–71. Camptopteroides spp. Male (Qld, Mt. Edith, 1050m, 17.06ºS 145.37ºE, 4.ii–17.iii.1995, P. Zborowski) 66, antenna; 67, fore leg; 68; genitalia, lateral. Female, micropterous (Qld, Mt. Haig, 1150m, 16.06ºS 145.36ºE, 4.ii–17.iii.1995, P. Zborowski) 69, fore- and hind wings; 70, antenna. Female (Qld, Hugh Nelson River, 1150m, 17.27ºS 145.29ºE, i.xii.94–3.i.1995, P. Zborowski) 71, fore- and hind wings.

FIGURES 60–65. Camptoptera spp. Male of C.?immensa Girault (Qld, Hugh Nelson River, 1150m, 17.27ºS 145.29ºE, 6.iii–4.iv.1995, P. Zborowski) 60, fore- and hindwings; 61, fore leg; 62, antenna. Female of C.?immensa (Qld, Massey Creek, 1000m, 17.37ºS 145.34ºE, 4.ii–6.iii.1995, P. Zborowski) 63, antenna. Male of Camptoptera sp. (WA, “The Crusher” CALM site 9/1, S. by W. Mining Camp, Michell Plateau, 2–6.vi.1988, I.D. Naumann) 64, genitalia dorsal; 65, metasoma dorsal.

FIGURES 230–236. Ptilomymar sp. Male (Qld, Lake Eacham, 17.17°S 145.39°E, 15.ii–2.iii.1988, D.C.F. Rentz) 230, fore- and hind wings; 231, fore leg; 232, antenna; 233, gaster lateral; 234, genitalia lateral; 235, mesosoma lateral. Female (same data as above) 236, antenna.

FIGURES 21–29. Anagroidea spp. Male (Qld, Mt. Speck, 875m, 19.00°S 146.11°E, 1.viii–4.ix.1995, M. Cermak) 21, fore- and hindwings; 22, mandibles lateral; 23, body. Female (Tas., Saxons road, 41.18°S 145.36°E, 17.i–1.ii.1983, I. Naumann & J. Cardale) 24, antenna; 25, fore leg; 26, mandibles and lower face anterior. Male (same data as female) 27, genitalia lateral; 28, antenna; 29, genitalia dorsal.

FIGURES 190–197. Palaeoneura and Agalmopolynema spp. Palaeoneura. Male (Qld, Mt. Edith, 17.06°S 145.37°E, 1050m, 17.iii–6.iv.1995, P. Zborowski) 190, fore- and hind wings; 191, mesosoma dorsal; 192, gastral petiole and right metacoxa; 193, antenna; 194, genitalia. Agalmopolynema. Female (Qld, 15 km NE. by E. Heathlands, 11.41°S 142.42°E, 15–26.i.1992, I. Naumann & T. Weir) 195, fore leg; 196, antenna. Male (same data as female) 197, genitalia lateral.

FIGURES 213–215. Polynema saga (Girault). Female (Vic., Mitcham, i.1983, C. Lai) 213, fore- and hind wings; 214, head and antennae; 215, entire body (metasoma lateral).

FIGURES 36–41. Anaphes spp. Male of Anaphes nitens (Girault) (NSW, “Mill Post”, 6 km SW. by W. Bungendore, xi.1988, W. Wanjura, ex. Gonipterus on Eucalyptus maculata) 36, fore- and hind wings; 37, antenna; 38, genitalia ventral; 39, mesosoma and base of metasoma. Female of A. nitens (South Africa, ex. Gonipterus scutellatus) 40, antenna. Male of Anaphes sp. (NSW, nr. Moppy Lookout, Barrington Tops, 31.54°S 151.34°E, 11.ii.1984, I. Naumann) 41, fore leg.

FIGURES 266–273. Cleruchoides noackae. Lin & Huber. Female (holotype) 266, metasoma dorsal (gastral apex lateral); 267, head anterior; 268, antenna. Male (paratype, TAS, Devonport, 22.ix.1986, L. Hill, ex. Baclozygum?depressum) 269, fore- and hind wing; 270, genitalia; 271, fore leg. Male (paratype, TAS, Devonport, 15.v.1986, L. Hill, ex. Baclozygum?depressum on Eucalyptus globosus) 272, antenna; 273, meso- and metasoma dorsal.

FIGURES 123–128. Eubroncus sp. Female (Qld, Wooroonoonan Nat. Park, 17°20’30”S 146º52’08”E, 85m, 24.ix.2004, L. Masner) 123, fore-and hind wings; 124, head and antenna dorsal; 125, fore leg. Male (Qld, Mt. Lewis, 20.xii.1986, H. & A. Howden) 126, antenna; 127, head lateral; 128, genitalia lateral (upsidedown).

FIGURES 147–152. Himopolynema spp. Female of H.?longiclavatum Taguchi (Malaysia, Selangor, Kuala Lumpur, Universiti Malaya, botanical garden, 10–12.vi.1996, S.L. Heydon) 147, fore- and hind wings; 148, antenna. Male of H.?parviscutum Hayat & Anis (Russia, Primorskiy Krai, Ussuriysk District, Gornotayozhnoye, 43°66’N 132º25’E, 200m,1–2.viii.1999, M.V. Michailovskaya) 149, antenna; 150, genitalia; 151, head anterior; 152, mesosoma dorsal.

FIGURES 260–265. Kompsomymar bicoloratum. Lin & Huber. Female (holotype) 260, fore-and hind wings; 261, antenna; 262, fore leg. Male (paratype, TAS, 3 km S. Mt. Oakleigh, Pelion Hut, 41.50°S 146.03°E, 11.ii–1.iii.1990) 263, antenna; 264, genitalia; 265, head and mesosoma dorsal.

FIGURES 1–6. Acmopolynema capeyorki S. Triapitsyn & Berezovskiy. Male (Qld, Iron Range, Cape York Pen., 26– 31.v.1971, S.R. Monteith) 1, fore- and hind wings; 2, fore leg; 3, mesosoma dorsal; 4, genitalia dorsal. Female (Qld, 14 km W. by N. Hope Vale, 15.16°S 144.59°E, 7–10.v.1981, I.D. Naumann) 5, head anterior; 6, antenna.

FIGURES 14–20. Allanagrus spp. Male (Qld, Brisbane Forest Park, 27°25’04”S 152°49’48”E, 21–27.iii.1998, N. Power) 14, fore- and hind wings. Male (same data as above but 14–20.iii.1998) 15, antenna; 16, head anterior; 17, fore leg. Male (Qld, 12 km SSE. Heathlands, 11.51S 142.38E, 22.iii–25.iv.1992, T. McLeod) 18, genitalia dorsal. Female (same data as above but 4.ix.1997) 19, antenna; 20, body, (right middle leg detached electronically and positioned above head).

FIGURES 77–82. Palaeoneura spp. Male of P. dei (Girault) (NT, 53 km SSW. Darwin, 12º52’10.5”S 130º35’04.4”E, mango patch, 22–29.ix.1997, M. Hoskins). 77, fore- and hind wings; 78, genitalia lateral. Female of P.dei(same data as above but 25.viii–1.ix.1998) 79, antenna; 80, fore legs. Male of P. sophoniae (Huber), paratype (Hawaii, ex. Sophonia rufofascia) 81, antenna; 82, genitalia dorsal.

FIGURES 247–253. Stephanodes sp. Female (ACT, Piccadilly Circus, 35.22°S 148.48°E, 1240m, i. 1984, J. Lawrence, T. Wier, M.-L. Johnson) 247, antenna. Male (same data as above) 248, fore- and hind wings; 249, fore leg; 250, antenna; 251, genitalia; 252, head anterior; 253, mesosoma lateral.

FIGURES 242–246. Schizophragma sp. Female (Qld, McIllwraith Range, 11 km W. by N. Bald Hill, 13.44°S 143.20°E, 500m, I. Naumann) 242, fore- and hind wings; 243, antenna. Female (Qld, Heathlands, 11.45°S 142.35°E, 25.iv–7.vi.1992, T. McLeod) 244, fore leg; 245, gaster lateral; 246, mesosoma dorsal

FIGURES 280–284. Parastethynium maxwelli. Female (Qld, Heathlands, 11.45°S 142.35°E, 25.iv–7.vi.1992, T. McLeod) 280, fore- and hind wings; 281, antenna; 282, fore leg; 283, meso- and metasoma lateral; 284, head anterior.

FIGURES 30–35. Anagrus spp. Female of A. avalae Soyka (Tas., Hobart, 3.xii.1935, ex. Typhlocyba australis eggs from Nelson, New Zealand) 30, body. Female of Anagrus sp. (Qld, Heathlands, 25.iv–7.vi.1992, T. Mcleod) 31, antenna; 32, fore leg. Male of Anagrus sp. (ACT, City Hill, Canberra, 16.vi.2004, N.Q. Lin) 33, fore- and hind wings; 34, antenna. Male of Anagrus sp. (Qld, Hann River, 20.x–17.xi.1993; P. Zborowski & M. Horak) 35, genitalia dorsal.

FIGURES 47–53. Australomymar spp. Female (NSW, 14 km W. Urbenville, Tooloom Plateau, 28.29°S 152.24°E, 14.ii.1984, I.D. Naumann) 47, fore leg. Male (same data as above) 48, antenna; 49, fore- and hind wings; 50, genitalia lateral. Female (NSW, 2 km S. by W. Monga, 9.xi.1981, I.D. Naumann & J.C. Cardale) 51, antenna; 52, gaster lateral. Male (same data as above) 53, genitalia dorsal.

FIGURES 117–122. Erythmelus spp. Female (Qld, Heathlands, 11.45°S 142.35°E, 26.i–29.ii.1992, P. Feehney) 117, antenna; 118, fore-and hind wings; 119, fore leg. Female (Tas., Ewart Creek, 41.58°S 145.28°E, 16.i–2.ii.1983, I.D. Naumann & J.C. Cardale) 120, gaster lateral. Male (Qld, Heathlands, dump, 11.45°S 142.35°E, 25.vii–18.viii.1992, P. Zborowsi & J. Cardale) 121, antenna; 122, genitalia ventral.

FIGURES 221–224. Prionaphes sp. Female (ACT, 3 km E. Piccadilly Circus, Blundells Creek, 35.22°S 148.50°E, 850m, ii.1984, Weir, Lawrence & Johnson) 221, antenna; 222, fore leg. Female (ACT, Blundells Creek, 35.22°S 148.50°E, ii.1987, D. Colless) 223, fore- and hind wings. Female (same data as above) 224, propodeum and gaster dorsal.

FIGURES 72–76. Ceratanaphes sp. Female (Qld, 16 km SSE. Musselbrook Camp, 18.44ºS 138.12ºE, 8–18.v.1995, I.D. Naumann) 72, antenna; 73, fore leg. Male (Qld, Musselbrook Camp, 18.36ºS 138.08ºE, 8–21.v.1995, I.D. Naumann) 74, antenna; 75, fore- and hind wings; 76, genitalia ventral.

FIGURES 83–88. Cleruchus spp. Female (ACT, Piccadilly Circus, 1240m, ii.1984, J. Lawrence, T. Weir, M.-L. Johnson) 83, antenna; 84, fore leg. Male (ACT, 3 km E. Piccadilly Circus, Blundells Creek, 850m, 35.22ºS 148.50ºE, viii.1985, J. Lawrence, T. Weir, & M.-L. Johnson) 85, antenna; 86, genitalia ventral. Female of C. (Haplochaeta) sp. (same data as male above) 87, antenna; 88, fore- and hind wings.