Megaselia onsildensis, Henry & Bøggild, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4975.2.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4F22565A-7089-49FD-9313-63195491B3EA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4925231 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E487AE-FFD9-7B15-78B7-E649FD5AAF65 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Megaselia onsildensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Megaselia onsildensis View in CoL n. sp.
( Figs 173–182 View FIGURES 173–182 , 239–240 View FIGURE 239 View FIGURE 240 )
Diagnosis. In the key of Lundbeck (1922) for Group VII it runs to couplet 22 lead 1 M. maura (Wood), but it has a different hypopygium with well developed hypandrial lobes. In the key to the males of the British species ( Disney, 1989) it runs to couplet 263 lead 2 top M. maura or couplet 225 lead 1 M. sptemtrionalis (Schmitz). However, the latter having been described from the female only, recognition of this species gave rise to confusion prior to augmentation of its description by Buck & Disney (2001) and the male previously attributed to this species being recognized as the new species M. labellaspinata Disney. It has a different hypopygium, a costal index exceeding 0.45, posterodorsal hair palisades on all five joints of the front tarsus and postpedicels with SPS vesicles. Subsequently 5 added species running to these couplets, apart from their different hypopygia, differ in one or more of the following featuresposterodorsal hair palisades on all five segments of the front tarsus, postpedicels with SPS vesicles, 3 notopleural bristles, costal index exceeding 0.43. In Borgmeier’s (1966) key to Nearctic Group VIII it runs to couplet 15 lead 2 M. pygmaeola Borgmeier, which has very short microsetae on its antennal aristae and very weak posterodorsal hairs on the hind tibiae. Our species fails to run down in keys for the rest of the world’s fauna and subsequent additions.
Description. Male. Frons as Fig. 173 View FIGURES 173–182 , with dense but very fine microtrichia all over and upper supra-antennal bristles further apart than the pre-ocellars. Cheek with 4 bristles and jowl with 2 that are longer and more robust. Antennae, palps, proboscis as Fig. 174 View FIGURES 173–182 , the labella having short spinules below ( Fig. 175 View FIGURES 173–182 ). Thorax brown, with 2 notopleural bristles and no cleft in front of these, and mesopleuron bare ( Fig. 176 View FIGURES 173–182 ). Scutellum with an anterior pair of small hairs and a posterior pair of bristles. Abdominal tergites and venter as Fig 177 View FIGURES 173–182 , the venter having small hairs on segments 3–6. Hypopygium as Figs 178, 179 View FIGURES 173–182 , 239 View FIGURE 239 & 240 View FIGURE 240 . The hypandrial lobes being vestigial. Legs yellowish brown to pale yellow. Fore tarsus ( Fig. 180 View FIGURES 173–182 ) with posterodorsal hair palisades on segments 1–4 and 5 longer than 4 and 5 a little darker. Dorsal hair palisade of mid tibia extends about 75 times its length. Hairs below basal half of hind femur longer than those of anteroventral row of outer half ( Fig. 181 View FIGURES 173–182 ). Hind tibia with a dozen well differentiated posterodorsal hairs, without anterodorsals, and spinules of apical combs simple. Wings (fig. 241) with membrane only lightly tinged, thick veins light brown and thin veins pale gray. Wing length 1.9–2.1 mm. Costal index 0.38. Costal ratios 4.8–5.5: 1.2–1.5: 1. Costal cilia (of section 3) 0.10–0.11 mm long. Vein 3 hair 0.06 mm long. 4 axillary bristles, the outermost being 0.12–0.14 mm long. Sc not reaching R1. Haltere knob brown ( Fig. 182 View FIGURES 173–182 ).
Type material. Holotype male, DENMARK, DK EJ, Nr. Onsild Mose, 7–24.VII.2017, Esben Bøggild ( UCMZ —9–23) . Paratype, DK EJ, Nr. Onsild Mose, 7–24.VII.2017, Esben Bøggild in ZMUC, Copenhagen. Also known from two sites in Sweden (Hartop & Bøggild, unpublished).
Etymology. Named after the type locality.
EJ |
Ein Yabrud collection catalogue entries at The Hebrew University |
ZMUC |
Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.