Astenus ambohitantelyensis Janák & Baňař, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4980.1.8 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DF5C6B16-642A-4238-A4C2-AFDF9B2A1A29 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4883131 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E487B6-FFD5-FFCE-FF41-886FFC4F791A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Astenus ambohitantelyensis Janák & Baňař |
status |
sp. nov. |
Astenus ambohitantelyensis Janák & Baňař View in CoL , sp. nov.
( Figs. 1–11 View FIGURES 1–11 , 40–41 View FIGURES 40–41 )
Type locality. Madagascar, Ambohitantely Special Reserve
Type material. Holotype ♂: “ABT/ Sept.2011 /24 MADAGASCAR, AMBOHITANTELY Spec. Res.; 5.ix.2011; S18°11’43.3‘‘ E47°17’22.5‘‘, 1640m; sifting of forest litter under palm tree, Winkler app. Extraction, L.S. Rahanitriniaina lgt. // HOLOTYPUS Astenus ambohitantelyensis sp. nov., Janák & Baňař det. 2020” ( MMBC) GoogleMaps . Paratypes: 1 ♀: first label same as the holotype ( MMBC) ; 1 ♂: “ABT/ Sept.2011 /14 MADAGASCAR, AMBOHITANTELY Spec. Res. ; 3.ix.2011; S18°10’57.6‘‘ E47°17’19.7‘‘, 1544m; sifting forest litter and dry fern, Winkler app. extr.; L.S. Rahanitriniaina lgt.” ( JJRC) GoogleMaps ; 1 ♂: “ABT/06/2011 MADAGASCAR 2011, Ambohitantely Spec. Res. ; 19.iv., S18°11’02.5‘‘, E47°17’12.9‘‘; 1577m, sifting forest litter, Winkler apparatus extraction; L.S. Rahanitriniaina lgt.” ( MMBC, aedeagus missing) GoogleMaps , 1 ♀: “ABT/ Sept.2011 /21 MADAGASCAR, Ambohitantely Spec. Res. ; 5.ix.2011; S18°11’23.1‘‘ E47°17’38.1‘‘, 1635m; sifting of forest litter and dry fern; secodary forest; Winkler app. extraction; L.S. Rahanitriniaina lgt.” ( MMBC) GoogleMaps . All paratypes with an additional label “ PARATYPUS Astenus ambohitantelyensis sp. nov., Janák & Baňař det. 2020” .
Description: Body length 4.7–6.4 mm (M = 5.4 mm, HT = 4.7 mm), forebody length 2.4–2.6 mm (M = 2.6 mm, HT = 2.4 mm). Black to dark brown, anterior part of head and abdomen dark brown, femora and tibiae brown, knees and tarsi light reddish yellow, antennomeres 1–7 dark reddish brown, antennomeres 8–11 and mouthparts light reddish yellow ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–11 ).
Head ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1–11 ) moderately convex, a fifth longer than wide (L/W = 1.17–1.22, M = 1.20, HT = 1.20). Surface with coarse and dense umbilicate punctures. Eyes moderately large, temples on average about 1.2 times as long as eyes (TL/EL 1.16–1.30, M = 1.20, HT = 1.18). Temples moderately narrowed posteriorly. Antennae moderately short, fifth antennomere about 2.5 times longer than wide (L/W = 2.50–2.73, M = 2.63, HT = 2.50), tenth antennomere about twice as long as wide (L/W = 1.93–2.11, M = 2.02, HT = 2.08).
Pronotum ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1–11 ) egg-shaped, moderately convex, a quarter longer than wide (L/W = 1.19–1.26, M = 1.24, HT = 1.25) and moderately narrower than head (PW/HW = 0.87–0.89, M = 0.88, HT = 0.87). Sides markedly narrowed posteriorly. Surface, except for very narrow unpunctured midline with coarse and dense umbilicate punctures similar as on head.
Elytra ( Figs. 2, 3 View FIGURES 1–11 ) elongate with rounded sides, concave along suture, about 1.3 times longer than wide (R = 1.26–1.34, M = 1.30, HT = 1.30). Surface moderately coarsely and densely punctured. Interstices shining, without microscupture. Shoulders with 2 tubercules bearing long, protruding fragile spines ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1–11 ) [in most specimens including HT broken and missing]. Sides with additional a few shorter and less protruding spines.
Abdomen ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–11 ) slightly widened to segment VI, finely and densely punctured. Interstices shining, without microsculpture.
Male. Posterior margin of sternite VII very slightly, almost invisible emarginate and with almost 40 rod shaped moderately long spines ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 1–11 ), sternite VIII long and narrow, with triangular emargination in posterior quarter ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 1–11 ). Aedeagus ( Figs. 4–9 View FIGURES 1–11 ) 0.77 mm long. Median lobe in ventral view moderately wide, sides slightly emarginate in middle part and with small narrow sub-rounded point. Median lobe in lateral view with distinct subapical dent.
Female. Sternite VIII largely rounded posteriorly.
Differential diagnosis. The new species is to be arranged in the last key of Madagascan Astenus ( Janák & Lecoq 2007) in the couplet 12b near A. ambondrombe Janák & Lecoq, 2007 and A. ambrensis Janák, 2008 and differs from these species by very slightly, almost invisible emarginated posterior margin of the male sternite VII with moderately long rod shaped spines and different shape of aedeagus (see Figs. 38–44 View FIGURES 31–39 View FIGURES 40–41 View FIGURES 42–43 View FIGURES 44–45 in Janák & Lecoq, 2007 and Figs. 2–6 View FIGURES 1–11 in Janák, 2008). There are also some external differences among these species – the color of A. ambohitantelyensis Janák & Baňař sp. nov. is much darker and the pronotum and elytra are on average longer than in remaining two species, but these characters are quite variable (see Fig. 39 View FIGURES 31–39 in Janák & Lecoq (2007) and Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–11 in Janák (2008) and measurements in the descriptions for details).
Etymology. This species is named the after the type locality – Ambohitantely Special Reserve.
Distribution. Astenus ambohitantelyensis Janák & Baňař sp. nov. is currently recorded only from the Ambohitantely Special Reserve in the northern central part of Madagascar
Bionomics. All specimens were collected in siftings of forest litter, palm trees and dry ferns in an indigenous or secondary forests at an altitude of 1540–1640 m a.s.l. ( Figs. 40, 41 View FIGURES 40–41 ).
MMBC |
Moravske Muzeum [Moravian Museum] |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |