Hitobia meghalayensis ( Tikader & Gajbe, 1976 ) Sankaran & Caleb & Sebastian, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2020.1871523 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5479406 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E487C5-441F-233F-FF56-979EFDADFCBD |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Hitobia meghalayensis ( Tikader & Gajbe, 1976 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Hitobia meghalayensis ( Tikader & Gajbe, 1976) View in CoL comb. nov. ( Figure 5 View Figure 5 )
Sergiolus meghalayensis Tikader & Gajbe, 1976: 186 View in CoL , figs 6–9 (♀). Tikader 1982: 449, figs 349–353 (♀).
Type material
Holotype female from INDIA: Meghalaya: Khasi Hills (25°35ʹ00.00ʹ’ N, 91°38ʹ00.00ʹ’ E; 1649 m alt), S. Biswas leg., 14 February 1973, repository NZC-ZSI, Kolkata (no register number), examined. GoogleMaps
Justification of the transfer
Detailed examination of the type of S. meghalayensis revealed that it lacks diagnostic features of Sergiolus (see the previous paragraph on H. lamhetaghatensis ), but instead, it has all of the diagnostic features of Hitobia , as in the case of previous species (compare Figure 5 View Figure 5 (b–d) with Kamura 1992, figs 11, 16, 20, 25). Moreover, this species has three cheliceral promarginal and one retromarginal teeth ( Tikader and Gajbe 1976), which is another diagnostic feature of Hitobia species ( Kamura 1992, figs 12, 21). Based on these observations, we propose to transfer S. meghalayensis to Hitobia .
Diagnosis
Females of H. meghalayensis comb. nov. are closely related to the females of Hitobia menglong Song, Zhu & Zhang, 2004 as both share inverted droplet-shaped spermathecae, but can be separated from the latter by W-shaped posterior epigynal margin (which is crescent-like in H. menglong ) (compare Figure 5 View Figure 5 (c–d) with Song et al. 2004, figs 87H–I).
Supplementary description
Female (holotype, Figure 5 View Figure 5 (a–b)). Body length 9.78. Prosoma length 3.73, width 2.74. Opisthosoma length 6.05, width 3.64. Eye sizes and interdistances: ALE 0.12. AME 0.10. PLE 0.13. PME 0.11; AME–AME 0.09. AME–PME 0.18. PME–PLE 0.15. PME–PME 0.16. Length of chelicerae 1.12. Clypeus height at ALEs 0.11, at AMEs 0.16. Epigyne ( Figure 5 View Figure 5 (c–d)): epigynal plate sclerotised, roughly diamond-shaped, with diagonally oriented posterolateral sclerotised margins and W-shaped posterior epigynal margin ( Figure 5 View Figure 5 (c)). Spermathecae large sac-like ( Figure 5 View Figure 5 (d)). Fertilisation ducts narrow, diverging.
Male. Unknown.
Remarks
The ZSI collection has one glass bottle for this species labelled as ‘holotype’ (5045/18) containing a female specimen in poor condition. The same bottle has a small glass vial containing the dissected epigyne.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Hitobia meghalayensis ( Tikader & Gajbe, 1976 )
Sankaran, Pradeep M., Caleb, John T. D. & Sebastian, Pothalil A. 2021 |
Sergiolus meghalayensis
Tikader BK 1982: 449 |
Tikader BK & Gajbe UA 1976: 186 |