Hitobia meghalayensis ( Tikader & Gajbe, 1976 ) Sankaran & Caleb & Sebastian, 2021

Sankaran, Pradeep M., Caleb, John T. D. & Sebastian, Pothalil A., 2021, On the taxonomic validity of Indian ground spiders: IV. Genera Apodrassodes Vellard, 1924, Herpyllus Hentz, 1832 and Sergiolus Simon, 1892 (Araneae: Gnaphosidae), Journal of Natural History 54 (43 - 44), pp. 2839-2857 : 2848-2851

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2020.1871523

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5479406

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E487C5-441F-233F-FF56-979EFDADFCBD

treatment provided by

Marcus

scientific name

Hitobia meghalayensis ( Tikader & Gajbe, 1976 )
status

comb. nov.

Hitobia meghalayensis ( Tikader & Gajbe, 1976) View in CoL comb. nov. ( Figure 5 View Figure 5 )

Sergiolus meghalayensis Tikader & Gajbe, 1976: 186 View in CoL , figs 6–9 (♀). Tikader 1982: 449, figs 349–353 (♀).

Type material

Holotype female from INDIA: Meghalaya: Khasi Hills (25°35ʹ00.00ʹ’ N, 91°38ʹ00.00ʹ’ E; 1649 m alt), S. Biswas leg., 14 February 1973, repository NZC-ZSI, Kolkata (no register number), examined. GoogleMaps

Justification of the transfer

Detailed examination of the type of S. meghalayensis revealed that it lacks diagnostic features of Sergiolus (see the previous paragraph on H. lamhetaghatensis ), but instead, it has all of the diagnostic features of Hitobia , as in the case of previous species (compare Figure 5 View Figure 5 (b–d) with Kamura 1992, figs 11, 16, 20, 25). Moreover, this species has three cheliceral promarginal and one retromarginal teeth ( Tikader and Gajbe 1976), which is another diagnostic feature of Hitobia species ( Kamura 1992, figs 12, 21). Based on these observations, we propose to transfer S. meghalayensis to Hitobia .

Diagnosis

Females of H. meghalayensis comb. nov. are closely related to the females of Hitobia menglong Song, Zhu & Zhang, 2004 as both share inverted droplet-shaped spermathecae, but can be separated from the latter by W-shaped posterior epigynal margin (which is crescent-like in H. menglong ) (compare Figure 5 View Figure 5 (c–d) with Song et al. 2004, figs 87H–I).

Supplementary description

Female (holotype, Figure 5 View Figure 5 (a–b)). Body length 9.78. Prosoma length 3.73, width 2.74. Opisthosoma length 6.05, width 3.64. Eye sizes and interdistances: ALE 0.12. AME 0.10. PLE 0.13. PME 0.11; AME–AME 0.09. AME–PME 0.18. PME–PLE 0.15. PME–PME 0.16. Length of chelicerae 1.12. Clypeus height at ALEs 0.11, at AMEs 0.16. Epigyne ( Figure 5 View Figure 5 (c–d)): epigynal plate sclerotised, roughly diamond-shaped, with diagonally oriented posterolateral sclerotised margins and W-shaped posterior epigynal margin ( Figure 5 View Figure 5 (c)). Spermathecae large sac-like ( Figure 5 View Figure 5 (d)). Fertilisation ducts narrow, diverging.

Male. Unknown.

Remarks

The ZSI collection has one glass bottle for this species labelled as ‘holotype’ (5045/18) containing a female specimen in poor condition. The same bottle has a small glass vial containing the dissected epigyne.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Gnaphosidae

Genus

Hitobia

Loc

Hitobia meghalayensis ( Tikader & Gajbe, 1976 )

Sankaran, Pradeep M., Caleb, John T. D. & Sebastian, Pothalil A. 2021
2021
Loc

Sergiolus meghalayensis

Tikader BK 1982: 449
Tikader BK & Gajbe UA 1976: 186
1976
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF