Sebasmia olemehli, Miroshnikov, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.15298/rusentj.31.2.10 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E487E7-FF9C-1C5B-FF00-F97D972C5DC5 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Sebasmia olemehli |
status |
|
KEY TO SPECIES OF SEBASMIA FROM View in CoL SRI LANKA
1. Antennomere 5, 1.3–1.8 times as long as antennomere 4; body smaller, not more than about 25 mm in length; coloration of recumbent setation of dorsum clearly less bright, at most can only be with a yellowish tint ........ 2
— Antennomere 5 at least 2.1 times as long as antennomere 4; body larger, not less than about 29 mm in length; coloration of recumbent setation of dorsum clearly bright- er, mainly combines yellow and rufous (foxy) tones ..... ................................................................... S. templetoni View in CoL
2. Apical external angle of elytra rounded or subrectangular, as in Figs 27–28; antennomere 3 not more than 1.3 times as long as antennomere 1; folds on pronotal disc coarser .......... 3
— Apicalexternalangleofelytraprotrudingtooth-shaped,asin Fig. 26; antennomere 3 almost 1.5 times as long as antennomere 1; folds on pronotal disc less coarse ....... S. testacea View in CoL
3. Body slenderer, as in Figs 1–2; male antennae clearly longer than body .......................................................... 4
— Body more robust (https://www.cerambycoidea.com); male antennae clearly shorter than body (Southern Province, Udugama) ....................................... Sebasmia sp.
4. Dorsum clearly darker, as in Fig. 1; pronotal disc with a very wide, longitudinal, almost bare, median area, as in Fig. 4; femora more strongly claviform, as in Figs 13, 15, 18 ......................................................... S. olemehli View in CoL sp.n.
— Dorsum clearly lighter, as in Fig. 2; pronotal disc with a narrow, longitudinal, almost bare, median area, as in Fig. 5; femora less strongly claviform, as in Figs 12, 14, 17 ........................................................... S. ceylonica View in CoL sp.n.
Acknowledgements. I am very grateful to Maxwell V.L. Barclay (BMNH), Alexey Yu. Solodovnikov (NHMD) for the opportunity to study the museum material, to Kirill V. Makarov (Moscow Pedagogical State University, Moscow, Russia) and my wife Tatiana P. Miroshnikova who helped a lot in the preparation of the illustrations for publication.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |