Megasternum japonicum Shatrovskiy, 1989
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3219.1.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6180452 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E687BA-FFE3-F328-FF5E-FABE0D86C6B1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Megasternum japonicum Shatrovskiy, 1989 |
status |
|
Megasternum japonicum Shatrovskiy, 1989 View in CoL , stat. restit.
Megasternum gibbulum auctt. nec Motschulsky, 1866 View in CoL : Sharp (1874: 420); Knisch (1924: 158); Nakane (1966: 55); Satô (1985: 211).
Megasternum japonicum Shatrovskiy, 1989: 286 View in CoL .
Megasternum japonicum: Shatrovskiy (1992: 368, subsequent more detailed description) View in CoL ; Hansen (1999: 305, catalogue); Hoshina & Satô (2005: 13, incorrectly synonymized with M. gibbulum View in CoL ).
Material examined. JAPAN: Tochigi: 8 spec. ( PJWP, NMPC): Nikko City env. [coordinates ca. 36°43'N 139°42'E], 23.ix.2006, lgt. P. Jaloszynski. GoogleMaps RUSSIA: Kuril Islands: 1 spec. ( MPU): Kunashir Is. , UV okr. oz. Peschanoye ( Sernovodsk-Alekhino ) [ South-East vicinities of Peschanoye lake ( Sernovodsk-Alekhino road)], 8.vii. 2008, lgt. K. Makarov .
Taxonomic notes. There is a single species of Megasternum occurring on the Japanese islands which differs from the continental M. concinnum (Marsham, 1803) by finely but distinctly punctate ventrites 2–5 (impunctate in M. concinnum ). The Japanese species was for the first time recognized and diagnosed as separate from M. concinnum by Sharp (1874), who called it Megasternum gibbulum Motschulsky, 1866 even though he did not examine the Motschulsky’s types and noticed some discordance between his Japanese specimens and Motschulsky’s (1866) short description of M. gibbulum . Sharp’s (1874) interpretation of M. gibbulum was followed by all subsequent Japanese authors. While working on the keys to identification of the Hydrophilidae of Russian Far East, A. G. Shatrovskiy reexamined the types of Megasternum gibbulum in Motschulsky collection, designated the lectotype of this species, correctly recognized that the type specimens do not belong to the genus Megasternum but Pachysternum and realized that the Japanese species of Megasternum is therefore unnamed. For that reason, he described the Japanese species as Megasternum japonicum (see Shatrovskiy 1989, 1992). Unfortunately, the transfer of Megasternum gibbulum to Pachysternum , its synonymization with P. haemorrhoum and the designation of its lectotype was never published, and the reasons for describing Megasternum japonicum remained therefore unexplained. For that reason, Hoshina & Satô (2005) synonymized Megasternum japonicum with M. gibbulum , considering some paratypes of M. japonicum from the Lewis collection in BMNH as being at the same time syntypes of M. gibbulum . All paratypes deposited in BMNH and mentioned by Shatrovskiy (1992) were, however, collected after the description of M. gibbulum by Motschulsky (1866) and therefore cannot be syntypes of the latter species. Hoshina & Satô (2005) did not examine the specimens of M. gibbulum from the Motschulsky collection deposited in ZMUM, which are all conspecific with Pachysternum haemorrhoum (see above under this species). For that reason, the synonymy of Megasternum japonicum with M. gibbulum proposed by Hoshina & Satô (2005) is incorrect, and Megasternum japonicum has to be resurrected as a valid name for the Japanese species of the genus Megasternum .
MPU |
MPU |
NMPC |
National Museum Prague |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Sphaeridiinae |
Genus |
Megasternum japonicum Shatrovskiy, 1989
Fikáček, Martin, Jia, Fenglong & Prokin, Alexander 2012 |
Megasternum japonicum
Shatrovskiy 1989: 286 |
Megasternum gibbulum auctt. nec
Sato 1985: 211 |
Nakane 1966: 55 |
Knisch 1924: 158 |
Sharp 1874: 420 |
Megasternum japonicum:
Shatrovskiy (1992: 368 |
Hansen (1999: 305 |
Hoshina & Satô (2005: 13 |