Natella viridescens ( Melvill & Ponsonby, 1891 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4094.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E5F1E766-687D-4B00-974B-8D7939DC66A0 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5615864 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E687FC-E03C-D774-FF1A-131609099F71 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Natella viridescens ( Melvill & Ponsonby, 1891 ) |
status |
|
Natella viridescens ( Melvill & Ponsonby, 1891) View in CoL
Figures 2A View FIGURE 2. A , 3 View FIGURE 3 D, 4H, 5C, 6F, 9C, 37–40
Helix (Patula) viridescens Melvill & Ponsonby, 1891: 238 . Melvill & Ponsonby, 1892a, pl. 4, fig. 1. Type loc.: Pretoria.
Patula viridescens —Pilsbry, 1892 in 1892–1893: 78, pl. 30, fig. 32.
Natalina viridescens — Melvill & Ponsonby, 1898b: 171. Connolly, 1912: 98.
Rhytida (Macrocycloides) viridescens — Möllendorff & Kobelt, 1903, in 1903 –1905: 61, pl. 10, fig. 26. Kobelt, 1909: 53.
Nata (Natella) viridescens — Watson, 1934: 160. Connolly, 1939: 103, text fig. 7 (radula). Zilch, 1959 –60: 554, fig. 1937. Schileyko, 2000: 748, fig. 974.
Nata viridescens — Bruggen, 1967: 28, 29. Richardson, 1989: 46. Herbert & Kilburn, 2004: 219.
Etymology. From viridescens (L.)–greenish; presumably in reference to the ‘olivaceous epidermis’ (periostracum) noted by the original authors.
Type material. Holotype of Helix (Patula) viridescens Melvill & Ponsonby, 1891 in NHMUK (1905.1.26.24), diameter 4.5 mm (in poor condition).
Additional material examined and literature records: See Appendix 6.
Identification. Shell characterised by its small size, low-discoidal profile, weak sculpture and wide umbilicus. Distinctive anatomical features are given in generic diagnosis.
Shell ( Fig. 37 View FIGURE 37 ): Discoidal, spire low to almost flat; largest specimens with approx. 2.0 teleoconch whorls; suture above periphery, not noticeably descendant prior to aperture; periphery usually slightly below mid-whorl; surface glossy throughout. Protoconch very small, diameter 0.7–1.0 mm, comprising ±1.0 whorl, smooth and glossy; junction with teleoconch usually weakly defined. Teleoconch initially sculptured only by faint growthlines, but last adult whorl with traces of weak pliculae below suture and with occasional stronger, irregularly spaced growth-lines; sculpture weaker on base. Aperture roundly ovate; peristome interrupted by bulging parietal region; outer lip thin with membranous periostracal fringe when undamaged; base and umbilical margin evenly rounded; umbilicus broad, patent to apex; columella lip not reflected.
Translucent, periostracum more or less uniformly pale golden-yellow to pale olive-yellow; little or no darker axial banding.
Dimensions: Largest specimen, diameter 5.3 mm, height 2.4 mm (Ithala Game Res., NMSA V2530); H:D of adults 0.42–0.47 (N=21).
Living animal ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 H): Few specimens examined alive; head and neck grey to dark grey, with scattered microscopic orange pigment granules, tentacles and retractor muscles often somewhat darker; foot paler ventrally, particularly the tail and beneath shell; ventro-lateral margins of foot with more numerous orange pigment granules; skin texture relatively smooth; mantle edge pale, often densely speckled with orange pigment granules; lining of mantle cavity lacking dark makings, whitish kidney sometimes conspicuous.
Radula ( Figs 6 View FIGURE 6 F, 38): Formula 1+7 +(3–4); length up to 1.9 mm, with 27–32 broadly V-shaped rows of teeth; rachidian present, narrow with a short, curved cusp; no clear distinction between lateral and marginal series, largest tooth taken to be outermost lateral; inner lateral teeth slender, the cusp down-curved; teeth progressively increasing in length from first to sixth; seventh tooth considerably larger (fang tooth), and much broader and blade-like; 3–4 teeth (marginals) beyond largest lateral, the first also flattened, but somewhat smaller and rather more narrowly acuminate, remaining marginals decreasing rapidly in size, a minute fourth marginal sometimes evident.
Distal genitalia ( Fig. 39 View FIGURE 39 ): Genital pore below pneumostome. Penis short and stout (length ± 0.7 mm), not obviously narrowing basally, bluntly rounded at its apex, from which the vas deferens and penial retractor muscle arise. Interior of penis with a broad verge extending for half its length from apex, basal section lined with low longitudinal folds, lacking papillation. No evidence of a swollen epiphallic region prior to insertion of vas deferens; the latter not reflexed and adnate to side of penis, but runs directly backward to its origin at base of spermoviduct. Genital atrium simple and vagina short with thickened wall. Bursa copulatrix and its duct about one-third length of spermoviduct, slender basally, but apical portion slightly swollen; the whole adnate to free oviduct and lower spermoviduct. A concentration of muscle fibres arises close to base of bursa copulatrix duct, connecting with adjacent body wall.
Distribution ( Fig. 40 View FIGURE 40 ): Endemic to north-eastern South Africa; from the Soutpansberg (Limpopo), south through N.W. Province, Gauteng and Mpumalanga, to the KwaZulu-Natal Midlands (Howick–Dargle area); mostly at altitudes over 500 m and commonly over 1000 m.
Habitat. Evidently catholic in habitat preferences. Most records from the northern part of the Great Escarpment are from forested habitats, but some of the localities in Gauteng, N.W. Province and KwaZulu-Natal indicate that the species also inhabits somewhat drier, thicket-type vegetation. Primarily in leaf-litter and under logs, but will climb walls and probably tree trunks.
Remarks. Natella viridescens is the smallest southern African rhytidid. Nata erugata sp. nov. and Nata vernicosa , with which it is known to co-occur, are substantially larger species and lack such a wide umbilicus. Juvenile specimens of both have deeper, fewer whorled shells with a much narrower umbilicus. The smaller Nata species, N. aequiplicata sp. nov. and N. tarachodes have stronger sculpture and occur only in the southern and western Cape respectively. Specimens of Natella viridescens from northern KwaZulu-Natal are often somewhat larger than those from other localities.
Conservation. With its wide distribution and broad habitat tolerance, Natella viridescens is not currently a species of conservation concern.
NHMUK |
Natural History Museum, London |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Natella viridescens ( Melvill & Ponsonby, 1891 )
David G. Herbert & Adnan Mousalli 2016 |
Nata viridescens
Herbert 2004: 219 |
Richardson 1989: 46 |
Bruggen 1967: 28 |
Nata (Natella) viridescens
Schileyko 2000: 748 |
Connolly 1939: 103 |
Watson 1934: 160 |
Rhytida (Macrocycloides) viridescens
Kobelt 1909: 53 |
Natalina viridescens
Connolly 1912: 98 |
Melvill 1898: 171 |
Helix (Patula) viridescens
Melvill 1891: 238 |