Rhyacophila huesunensis, Kiss, Ottó, 2016
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4168.2.11 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:500ECBC3-EA74-413C-AE4A-E4D3EA168285 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6067029 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E687FE-FF93-CE09-FF64-FF22FC062B3B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rhyacophila huesunensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Rhyacophila huesunensis , new species
Figs 1–5 View FIGURES 1 – 5
Male. Body length 6.0 mm (n=3), length of each forewing 7.1 mm, width of each forewing 2.2 mm, length of each antenna 6.2–7.5 mm. Body, antennae, palpi, wings, abdomen and legs dark brown in alcohol.
Male genitalia ( Figs 1–5 View FIGURES 1 – 5 ). Segment IX (IX., Figs 1–2 View FIGURES 1 – 5 ) subrectangular, dorsal edge undulate in lateral view, without apicodorsal lobe. Segment X (X., Figs 1–2, 5 View FIGURES 1 – 5 ) triangular in lateral view, with digitiform, short extension bilaterally, mesal lobe with sinuous apical margin in dorsal view. Anal sclerites (a.s., Figs 1, 5 View FIGURES 1 – 5 ) elongate, nearly spindle-shaped, both ends pointed, upper end in touch with segment X in lateral and caudal views; root of anal sclerites long with two proximal claws in lateral view. Tergal strap (t.s., Figs 1, 5 View FIGURES 1 – 5 ) thin, sclerotised extension in lateral view, turban-shaped in caudal view. First segment of each inferior appendage (f.s., Figs 1, 4 View FIGURES 1 – 5 ) much smaller than second segment, pentagonal, with broad ventral margin and acute dorsal proximal angle; second segment divided into two prominent lobes (s.s., Figs 1, 4 View FIGURES 1 – 5 ): upper lobe long, its upper margin curved ventrad subapically, with small subtriangular process on base of sinuous lower margin in lateral view, surface setose; lower lobe ( Figs 1, 4 View FIGURES 1 – 5 ) subtriangular with bulge on base of serrate, oblique upper margin, distal end blunt, lower margin straight, proximally curved upward; lower lobe slightly longer than upper lobe in lateral view. Phallotheca (phal., Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 5 ) short, tubular; endotheca (end., Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 5 ) longer, membranous, tubular in lateral view; phallicata (ph., Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 5 ) composed of stout proximal part and narrow, tubular distal part, phallic apparatus without dorsal appendage (d. app.); ventral process (v.p., Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 5 ) with accentuated medial lobe and huge dorsal and ventral spikes directed caudodorsad in lateral view; parameres (par., Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 5 ) ribbon-like and three times as long as segments IX–X when fully everted, distal end subtriangular and densely setose in lateral view.
Female. Unknown.
Holotype: ♂, TAIWAN: Huesun Forest Area , 16 km E of Kuohsing, Nanton County, Taiwan , Republic of China, 24o05’N, 121o00’E, 560 m elevation, by light trapping, 10 November 1996, leg. Tibor Csővári and Csaba Szabóki (gen. prep. No. 124, Ottó Kiss, coll. Mátra Museum). GoogleMaps
Paratypes: 2 ♂, TAIWAN: Huesun Forest Area , 16 km E of Kuohsing, Nanton County, Taiwan , Republic of China, 24o05’N, 121o00’E, 560 m elevation, by light trapping, 10 November 1996, leg. Tibor Csővári and Csaba Szabóki (coll. Ottó Kiss). GoogleMaps
Differential diagnosis. This species belongs to the Rhyacophila scissa Group of the R. philopotamoides Branch ( Schmid 1970) . The male genitalia of this species are similar to those of R. matanyii Kiss 2013 from Taiwan and R. steinmanni Kiss 2013 from Nepal, but differs from them in that:
1. Segment X is triangular in lateral view (not rectangular as in R. matanyii or not subrectangular as in R. steinmanni ) composed of short, digitiform extension bilaterally and mesal lobe in dorsal view (absent in R. matanyii and R. steinmanni ).
2. The anal sclerites are elongate, nearly spindle-shaped (not bulging as in R. matanyii or not hatchet-shaped as in R. steinmanni ).
3. The distal end of phallic parameres is subtriangular in lateral view (not similar to tennis racket as in R. matanyii or not bell-shaped as in R. steinmanni ).
4. The tergal strap is turban-shaped (not heart-shaped as in R. matanyii ).
5. The distal part of the lower lobe of the second segment of each inferior appendage is subtriangular (not hookshaped as in R. matanyii or not footprint-shaped as in R. steinmanni ), a bulge is present on the base of the upper margin of the lower lobe (it is absent in R. matanyii and also in R. steinmanni ).
Etymology. Named for the place where the new species was collected.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |