Castnia corrupta, (Schaus, 1896)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5194.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:96B016A1-5D9B-4013-9F9D-597A6C2FC277 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7157400 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E76362-FFF4-103A-14C7-7DBAFC69F9AA |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Castnia corrupta |
status |
|
corrupta ( Schaus, 1896) View in CoL
( Fig. 10A View FIGURE 10 )
“ Castnia corrupta , sp. nov. ” Schaus, 1896, Journal of the New York Entomological Society 4 (4): 147.
Type material: Not detailed in the original description which clearly relates to a male, records a single wing expanse, and makes no mention of any variability, so we can take it that there is a single male type which is a holotype by [likely] monotypy ( Fig. 10A View FIGURE 10 ). This specimen is in USNM .
Type locality: Schaus (1896) gave the type locality as Colombia, and this is all that is mentioned on the label data of the specimen. This cannot now be further restricted .
Taxonomic status: A junior subjective synonym of Castnia hodeei Oberthür, 1881 (now in Vadina ). Originally described as a species but synonymised by Miller (1995). Oberthür (1881) described V. hodeei from a single female; Schaus’s corrupta was the first description of the male, which is quite different from the female and was not at the time recognised as being the same species as hodeei . The first people who seem to have associated the male and female as a single species were Joicey & Talbot (1925).
Male genitalia: Not available.
Distribution: Not relevant.
Material examined: For this study we have examined the holotype.
USNM |
Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |