Euryopicoris, REUTER, 1875
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2011.00770.x |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10544398 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E8878D-FFC4-FFCE-5ED2-F8BBB1E4F956 |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Euryopicoris |
status |
|
EURYOPICORIS REUTER View in CoL View at ENA ( FIGS 3 View Figure 3 , 26–27 View Figure 26 View Figure 27 )
Euryopicoris Reuter, 1875b: 11 View in CoL (gen. nov.; type species: Capsus nitidus Meyer-Dür, 1843 View in CoL (by monotypy); Stichel, 1933: 235 (key); Hedicke, 1935: 58 (key); Kiritshenko, 1951: 127 (key); Wagner, 1952: 96, 105 (key, descr.); Carvalho, 1955: 66 (key); Euryopicoris Reuter, 1875b: 24 View in CoL (typogr. error, key); Reuter, 1875b (1): 87; (2): 99 (key, descr.); Reuter, 1891: 60, 158 (descr., key); Hueber, 1906: 4, 11 (key, descr.); Kirkaldy, 1906: 131 (cat.); Oshanin, 1910: 790 (cat.); Reuter, 1910: 147 (cat.); Carvalho, 1952: 73 (cat.); Carvalho, 1958: 11 (cat.); Wagner & Weber, 1964: 274 (descr.); Wagner, 1973: 51 (descr.); Schuh, 1995: 53 (world cat.).
Diagnosis: Distinguished from other genera by the combination of punctate, coleopteroid hemelytra and curved pro- and mesotibiae.
Redescription: Both sexes usually coleopterous, males rarely macropterous. 3–4.5 mm. Coloration ( Fig. 3 View Figure 3 ): nearly uniform glossy black, sometimes with yellowbrown at apices of femora and antennal segments, hemelytra of macropterous individuals reddishbrown; eyes red. Surface and vestiture ( Figs 3 View Figure 3 , 26A–F, H View Figure 26 ): surface glossy; head smooth with radiating folds emanating from centre of vertex; pronotum irregularly rugulose anteriorly, punctate posteriorly; scutellum rugulose; hemelytron punctate. Body with sparse distribution of simple setae, mostly on ventral part of head and ventral and lateral surfaces of body; antennae and legs with semi-erect spine-like setae interspersed with longer, thicker spines, particularly on AI and tibiae. Structure: head ( Figs 3 View Figure 3 , 26A–E View Figure 26 ): transverse, broader than anterior of pronotum; vertex flat, posterior margin thin, weakly bisinuate; eyes small and rounded, substylate; head height approximately three times eye height; frons broadly rounded, confluent with clypeus; buccula thin; labium ( Fig. 26D, E View Figure 26 ): reaches mesocoxae, LI short and thick. Antennae ( Figs 3 View Figure 3 , 26A–E View Figure 26 ): insertion in front and below ventral margin of eye; short, approximately as long as body; AI swollen, about two times length of eye height; AIII shorter than AIV. Thorax ( Figs 3 View Figure 3 , 26A, B, E–G View Figure 26 ): pronotum short, trapezoidal and nearly flat, posterior slightly broader than head, collar absent, callosite region weakly tumescent, lateral margins rounded, humeral angles broadly rounded, posterior margin weakly medially cleft; mesoscutum not visible; scutellum transverse; metathoracic spiracle prominent and elongate, surrounded by a thin band of evaporative bodies; MTG external efferent system broad, triangular, and swollen, ostiole vertically orientated, opens laterally, peritreme tear-shaped, orientated vertically, surrounded by evaporative bodies. Hemelytra ( Figs 3 View Figure 3 , 26A View Figure 26 ): macropterous: extending beyond apex of abdomen; costal margin weakly convex, nearly straight; membrane with single cell. Coleopterous individuals: long, partially covering tergite VI; undivided; lateral margins rounded, posterior margins weakly rounded. Legs ( Figs 3 View Figure 3 , 26H View Figure 26 ): metafemora slightly incrassate; fore- and mesotibiae distinctly curved and thickened; pretarsi with fleshy pulvilli. Abdomen ( Fig. 3 View Figure 3 ): pear-shaped in both sexes, becoming conical at apex. Male genitalia ( Fig. 27A–C View Figure 27 ): pygophore conical, genital opening narrow, posterior margin weakly sinuate, with shallow concavity below left paramere; both parameres long and thin basally; left paramere with tumescent sensory lobe, apophysis angled upwards, apically hooked; right paramere with angled apical club, apicolateral margin recurved; phallotheca broad basally, apically tapering; ductus seminis elongate, basally with flexible ribbing, subapically with elongate, weakly sclerotized section lacking flexible ribbing; secondary gonopore rounded, sclerotized, and U-shaped with prised operculum and fine scale-like texturing; endosoma with a single spine-like spicule. Female genitalia ( Fig. 27E, F View Figure 27 ): sclerotized rings widely separated, strongly sclerotized, oval, lateral, and medial margins and adjacent portions of DLP strongly upturned; lateral margins of DLP moderately sclerotized, medially with transverse bilaterally sulcate sclerotized plate (similar to the inter-ramal bridge in Labops ), middle of plate a small carinate point projecting into bursa copulatrix; posterior margin of VLP weakly sclerotized; posterior wall of bursa copulatrix simple and plate-like, medially membranous, laterally weakly sclerotized; vestibulum symmetrical, opening bordered by short, narrow paired sclerites.
Diversity and distribution: There are two species of Euryopicoris , with Euryopicoris fennicus known only from Finland and Euryopicoris nitidus broadly distributed across central Europe into Siberia.
Included species: Eu. fennicus Wagner, 1954 Finland
Eu. nitidus ( Meyer-Dür, 1843) View in CoL * Central and North Europe; Siberia
Biology and host plant associations: Euryopicoris nitidus is found in mountain meadows and is said to live on grasses. Adults are found from June to August. This species overwinters as eggs ( Wagner, 1973). There is no biological information for Eu. fennicus .
Remarks: Euryopicoris is similar to Anapus and Barbarosia in general structure. Although the secondary gonopore of Euryopicoris is most similar to that of Anapus , the lack of prominent sclerotized processes on the female posterior wall, the punctate hemelytra, and the curved fore- and mesotibiae of Euryopicoris set it apart. Euryopicoris shares punctate coleopteroid hemelytra and a bulging frons with Barbarosia , but the structure of the DLP in Euryopicoris is relatively simple in contrast to the complexity expressed in Barbarosia . Results of both unweighted and implied weighting phylogenetic analyses placed these three genera in a monophyletic clade, which together form the sister group to Myrmecophyes , Labops , and Scirtetellus .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Euryopicoris
Tatarnic, Nikolai J. & Cassis, Gerasimos 2012 |
Euryopicoris
Wagner E 1973: 51 |
Wagner E & Weber HH 1964: 274 |
Carvalho JCM 1958: 11 |
Carvalho JCM 1955: 66 |
Wagner E 1952: 96 |
Kiritshenko AN 1951: 127 |
Hedicke H 1935: 58 |
Stichel W 1933: 235 |
Oshanin B 1910: 790 |
Reuter OM 1910: 147 |
Hueber T 1906: 4 |
Kirkaldy GW 1906: 131 |
Reuter OM 1891: 60 |
Reuter OM 1875: 11 |
Reuter OM 1875: 24 |