Dimorphocoris, FIEBER
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2011.00770.x |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E8878D-FFCE-FFC4-5ED5-FB99B074F91E |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Dimorphocoris |
status |
|
DIMORPHOCORIS FIEBER View in CoL ( FIGS 3 View Figure 3 , 22–23 View Figure 22 View Figure 23 )
Dimorphocoris Reuter, 1890: 253 View in CoL [gen. nov.; type species: Orthlocephalus signatus Fieber, 1861 subsequent designation (junior synonym of Phytocoris gracilis Rambur, 1839 View in CoL )]; Reuter, 1891: 83, 159 (gen. nov., key); Hueber, 1906: 5, 6 (key, descr.); Kirkaldy, 1906: 131 (cat.); Oshanin, 1910: 784 (cat.); Reuter, 1910: 147 (cat.); Poppius, 1914: 85 (key, descr.); Bergevin, 1916: 61 (dimorphism); Stichel, 1933: 235 (key); Hedicke, 1935: 59 (key); Kiritshenko, 1951: 126 (key); Wagner, 1952: 96, 107 (key, descr.); Carvalho, 1952: 73 (cat.); Wagner, 1954: 221 (key to spp.); Carvalho, 1955: 67 (key); Carvalho, 1958: 8 (cat.); Lindberg, 1956: 56 (disc., key); Wagner, 1961: 50 (diag., key); Kerzhner, 1964b: 964 (diag., key); Wagner & Weber, 1964: 276 (syn., descr., key); Kerzhner, 1964a: 121 (key to spp. from USSR); Wagner, 1965a: 135 (disc., descr.); Wagner, 1965b: 57 (illustrated key); Wagner, 1969: 79 (modified key); Dimorphocoris (Pedetocoris) Kerzhner, 1970: 634 (subgen. nov., diag., disc., key); Wagner, 1973: 57 (descr., key); Linnavuori, 1992: 216 (key to lateralis View in CoL group); Ehanno, 1994a: 10–37 (illustrated disc. of morphology, incl. MG, FG); Schuh, 1995: 48 (world cat.).
Homoeocoris Fuente, 1918: 236 (gen. nov. type species: Orthocephalus tristis Fieber, 1861 View in CoL : syn. by Wagner, 1955: 241); Carvalho, 1958: 8 (cat.) Diagnosis: Recognized by the following combination of characters: female always brachypterous, male macropterous or brachypterous, macropterous individuals elongate and parallel-sided; body brown with yellow-brown and tan markings; frons, pronotum, and thoracic pleura with faint, symmetrical honeycombed texturing; eyes round and bulging, substylate to stylate; posterior margin of vertex with row of coarse black setae; endosoma with sclerites apparently originating from apex of secondary gonopore.
Redescription: Dimorphic, males macropterous or brachypterous, females brachypterous. Coloration ( Fig. 3 View Figure 3 ): Highly variable, but generally a combination of dark brown to black with yellow, yellow-brown, or tan markings. Surface and vestiture ( Figs 3 View Figure 3 , 22A–E, G, H View Figure 22 ): body mostly smooth and impunctate, with some bilaterally symmetrical, honeycomb-like texturing on vertex, frons, pronotum and thoracic pleura, these patches sometimes congruent with contrasting colour patterning. Most of body densely covered with short, pilose setae, much less densely covered with longer simple and spine-like setae; sometimes also with long, silvery scale-like setae; posterior of vertex with a transverse row of coarse black setae; antennae and tibiae with short, semi-reclining bristle-like setae, AI typically with several longer, thicker bristles. Structure: head ( Figs 3 View Figure 3 , 22A–D View Figure 22 ): transverse, wider than tall; gena height equal or greater than eye height; frons mostly flat and sloping, sometimes with shallow medial sulcus continuing onto vertex; vertex sometimes with bilateral depressions adjacent to eyes, posterior margin of vertex straight, not upturned or carinate, weakly concave to weakly convex; eyes round and bulging, substylate to stylate, projecting laterally beyond and not touching anterolateral margins of pronotum, sometimes angled upwards. Antennae ( Figs 3 View Figure 3 , 22B, C View Figure 22 ): insertion in line with or below ventral margin of eye; long, thin, and cylindrical, always longer in males but generally not longer than body length; AI sometimes swollen, always longer than eye height; AIV shorter than AIII. Thorax ( Figs 3 View Figure 3 , 22A, D, E View Figure 22 ): pronotum campanulate in macropterous males, rectangular in brachypterous individuals, gently sloping to nearly level, collar thin, often obscured by strongly tumescent callosite region, posterior margin straight to concave; mesoscutum visible in macropterous males, steeply posteriorly declivent; scutellum often medially tumescent in macropterous males, broad and flat in brachypterous individuals; metathoracic spiracle prominent, diagonal, with evaporative bodies; MTG external efferent system tear-shaped, occupying posterior half of metepisternum, ostiole narrow and orientated ventrolaterally, peritreme elongate, weakly depressed, surrounded by narrow band of evaporative bodies. Hemelytra ( Fig. 3 View Figure 3 ): Macropterous male: elongate, parallel-sided, cuneus long and thin; membrane with two cells, extends beyond tip of abdomen. Brachypterous: usually reduced to an undivided pad, sometimes with faint clavus. Legs ( Figs 3 View Figure 3 , 22F View Figure 22 ): long, particularly in macropterous males; pretarsi without pulvilli. Abdomen ( Fig. 3 View Figure 3 ): elongate in macropterous males, elongate-oval to pear-shaped in brachypterous individuals. Male genitalia ( Figs 23A–C View Figure 23 , 22G, H View Figure 22 ): pygophore triangular in lateral view; left paramere L-shaped, sensory lobe rounded and weakly swollen, apophysis tapering, apex often hooked or weakly bifid; apex of right paramere angled and spoon- or hockey stick-shaped, apex sometimes with a small apophysis; aedeagus fully enclosed within phallotheca; ductus seminis elongate, with flexible ribbing; secondary gonopore sometimes cup-shaped, often weakly sclerotized and ill-defined, sometimes with scale-like texturing; endosoma with either complex, serrate, sclerotized outpocketings (lateralis group) or with single or paired sclerotized, pedunculate processes, often serrate, emanating from dorsal wall of secondary gonopore ( Dim. gracilis group). Female genitalia ( Fig. 23D, E View Figure 23 ): sclerotized rings small, widely separated, mostly round to elongate-oval, lateral margins generally not curved upwards but lateral margin of adjacent portion of dorsal labiate plate typically upturned; posterior wall of bursa copulatrix variable, often divided into two bilaterally symmetrical regions of weak sclerotization, one anterior and one posterior, sometimes partly covered with fields of minute spines; vestibular opening symmetrical, with medial margins of first gonapophyses weakly swollen and weakly sclerotized.
Diversity and distribution: With 58 species this is the largest genus of Halticini . Dimorphocoris is found predominantly in the Mediterranean region but is also known to extend into North and East Africa, Central Asia, and Sakhalin Island in the North Pacific ( Ehanno, 1991, 1993, 1994a, b; Wagner, 1973; Linnavuori, 1992; Ehanno & Ribes, 1994). The genus is subdivided into two groups, the Dim. gracilis and Dim. lateralis groups.
Included species: Dimorphocoris abutilon Wagner, 1966 France
Dimorphocoris albipilis Kerzhner, 1964 Kazakhstan
Dimorphocoris alpinus Poppius, 1910 View in CoL Kenya
Dimorphocoris argaeicus Hoberlandt, 1956 View in CoL Turkey
Dimorphocoris asanovae Kerzhner, 1964 Palaearctic View in CoL region (western)
Dimorphocoris atrans Kerzhner, 1970 View in CoL Russia
Dimorphocoris beieri Wagner, 1965 View in CoL the former Yugoslavia
Dimorphocoris bleusei Puton, 1898 View in CoL Mediterranean
Dimorphocoris carayoni Ehanno & Ribes, 1994 View in CoL France
Dimorphocoris cilix Seidenstücker, 1962 View in CoL Turkey
Dimorphocoris concii Tamanini, 1972 View in CoL Italy
Dimorphocoris constantini Ehanno, 1994a View in CoL France
Dimorphocoris debilis ( Reuter, 1880) View in CoL Mediterranean
Dimorphocoris distylus Seidenstücker, 1964 View in CoL Turkey
Dimorphocoris dupuisi Ehanno, 1993a France
Dimorphocoris durfortae Ehanno & Ribes, 1994 View in CoL Spain
Dimorphocoris eckerleini Wagner, 1965 View in CoL Mediterranean
Dimorphocoris ehannoi Ribes & Ribes’ 2001 Morocco
Dimorphocoris fuscus Joakimov, 1909 View in CoL * Palaearctic region (western)
Dimorphocoris gallicus Wagner, 1965 View in CoL France
Dimorphocoris goulae Ehanno & Ribes, 1994 View in CoL Spain
Dimorphocoris gracilis ( Rambur, 1839) View in CoL * Algeria; Spain
Dimorphocoris josephinae Ehanno & Ribes, 1994 View in CoL Spain
Dimorphocoris lateralis Reuter, 1901 Palaearctic View in CoL region (western)
Dimorphocoris lividipennis Reuter, 1903 View in CoL Spain
Dimorphocoris longiceps Wagner, 1968 View in CoL Morocco
Dimorphocoris lurensis Wagner, 1957 View in CoL France
Dimorphocoris marci Rizzotti Vlach, 1998 View in CoL Italy
Dimorphocoris marginellus ( Puton, 1887) View in CoL Algeria; Morocco
Dimorphocoris mariae Linnavuori, 1952 View in CoL Mediterranean
Dimorphocoris matocqui Ehanno, 1993 France
Dimorphocoris mongolicus Kerzhner, 1970 View in CoL Mongolia
Dimorphocoris mutatus Seidenstücker, 1964 View in CoL Italy
Dimorphocoris obachi Ehanno & Ribes, 1994 View in CoL Spain
Dimorphocoris osellai Tamanini, 1976 View in CoL Italy
Dimorphocoris pedetes Kerzhner, 1964 View in CoL Kazakhstan
Dimorphocoris pericarti Tamanini, 1972 View in CoL France; Italy; Spain
Dimorphocoris poggi Carapezza, 2002 Italy
Dimorphocoris puigmalis Tamanini, 1976 View in CoL France
Dimorphocoris punctiger ( Horváth, 1881) View in CoL Israel; Syria
Dimorphocoris putoni ( Reuter, 1882) View in CoL Andorra; France
Dimorphocoris pygmaeus Wagner, 1955 View in CoL France
Dimorphocoris remanei Wagner, 1965 View in CoL Spain
Dimorphocoris robustus Wagner, 1957 View in CoL France
Dimorphocoris ruffoi Tamanini, 1971 View in CoL Italy
Dimorphocoris sari Linnavuori, 1992 View in CoL Greece
Dimorphocoris satyriscus ( Scott, 1870) View in CoL Spain
Dimorphocoris saulii Wagner, 1965 View in CoL Italy; Slovenia; the former Yugoslavia
Dimorphocoris schmidti ( Fieber, 1858) View in CoL Ukraine
Dimorphocoris seidenstueckeri Linnavuori, 1984 View in CoL Iraq
Dimorphocoris servadeii Tamanini, 1982 View in CoL Italy
Dimorphocoris tamaninii Ehanno, 1993 View in CoL France
Dimorphocoris tauricus ( Horváth, 1880) View in CoL * Russia
Dimorphocoris tiberghieni Ehanno, 1993 View in CoL France
Dimorphocoris tomasii Tamanini, 1971 View in CoL Italy
Dimorphocoris toros Seidenstücker, 1962 View in CoL Turkey
Dimorphocoris tristis ( Fieber, 1861) View in CoL Spain
Dimorphocoris tuatayae Wagner, 1965 View in CoL Morocco
Biology and host plant associations: Most species are thought to feed on grasses ( Wagner, 1973) with the majority of host records coming from the family Poaceae ( Table 1). Some species have also been collected from higher level angiosperms, with Dim. osellai collected from unidentified species of Lotus and Trifolium (Fabaceae) ( Tamanini, 1976), Dim. tristis found on Anthemis sp. (Asteraceae) ( Linnavuori, 1992), and Dim. seidenstueckeri collected from unidentified species of Asteraceae, Teurcrium (Lamiaceae) , and Trifolium (Fabaceae) ( Linnavuori, 1984) ( Table 1).
Many species, especially of the Dim. gracilis group, have restricted mountainous distributions, whereas others are more widely distributed in littoral meadows and on the grassy steppes of North Africa ( Wagner & Weber, 1964; Ehanno & Ribes, 1994). It is thought the restricted ranges of many species may be the result of the high degree of brachyptery expressed in the genus, particularly in females ( Linnavuori, 1992).
Remarks: Dimorphocoris is divided into two species groups: the Dim. lateralis group in which both sexes are brachypterous, and the Dim. gracilis group in which males are macropterous whereas females are brachypterous ( Linnavuori, 1992). Linnavuori (1992) further subdivided the former into three ‘phylogenetic subgroups’ (although no phylogenetic results were presented). The highly speciose Dim. gracilis group is also comprised of several distinct subgroupings, which are dealt with in detail by Ehanno (1993, 1994a, b) and Ehanno & Ribes (1994).
Members of the Dim. gracilis group are most similar in appearance and in genitalic form to the newly described monotypic genus Compositocoris Schwartz et al., 2008 : see appendix). In both cases the males are macropterous whereas the females are brachypterous, and the genitalia of both sexes are very similar. In particular, the presence of two paddleshaped sclerotized processes in the endosoma suggests a close relationship. Only the presence of apically stellate bristles on the body of the female and the structure of the posterior wall set Compositocoris apart. Although there is strong evidence to synonymize Compositocoris with Dimorphocoris , we refrain from doing so without examination of more specimens of Dimorphocoris .
Although we dissected few specimens of Dimorphocoris, Ehanno & Ribes (1994 ; Ehanno, 1994a, b) provide detailed illustrations of many species, including both male and female genital structure, which greatly assisted in informing this redescription.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Dimorphocoris
Tatarnic, Nikolai J. & Cassis, Gerasimos 2012 |
Homoeocoris
Carvalho JCM 1958: 8 |
Wagner E 1955: 241 |
Fuente JM 1918: 236 |
Dimorphocoris
Ehanno B 1994: 10 |
Linnavuori RE 1992: 216 |
Wagner E 1973: 57 |
Kerzhner IM 1970: 634 |
Wagner E 1969: 79 |
Wagner E 1965: 135 |
Wagner E 1965: 57 |
Kerzhner IM 1964: 964 |
Wagner E & Weber HH 1964: 276 |
Kerzhner IM 1964: 121 |
Wagner E 1961: 50 |
Carvalho JCM 1958: 8 |
Lindberg H 1956: 56 |
Carvalho JCM 1955: 67 |
Wagner E 1954: 221 |
Wagner E 1952: 96 |
Kiritshenko AN 1951: 126 |
Hedicke H 1935: 59 |
Stichel W 1933: 235 |
Bergevin ED 1916: 61 |
Poppius B 1914: 85 |
Oshanin B 1910: 784 |
Reuter OM 1910: 147 |
Hueber T 1906: 5 |
Kirkaldy GW 1906: 131 |
Reuter OM 1891: 83 |
Reuter OM 1890: 253 |