Chaetopelma karlamani Vollmer 1997
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.181769 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6229589 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E88792-FFE3-F237-FF3C-F9651637FC94 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Chaetopelma karlamani Vollmer 1997 |
status |
|
Chaetopelma karlamani Vollmer 1997 View in CoL
Figures 11–18 View FIGURES 11 – 18
Chaetopelma karlamani Vollmer 1997: 5 View in CoL , figs. 3–13, pl. 1–7 (D♂Ψ).
Material examined. Type material: Holotype ɗ ( NMW 18253) from Lapta, northern Cyprus, 28.III.1995, R. Karlaman leg.; examined. Paratype Ψ ( NMW 18254) from Karaman, Cyprus, 3.I.1995, P. Vollmer leg.; examined. Paratypes 1ɗ1Ψ ( ZMB 31464, 31465) from Lapithos, Besparmak Mountain, northern Cyprus, P. Vollmer leg.; male examined, female ZMB paratype not at museum yet, J. Dunlop pers. comm. Paratypes 1ɗ1Ψ ( AMNH); not examined. Paratypes 1ɗ1Ψ ( BMNH); not examined. Paratypes 1ɗ1Ψ (Güzelyurt Museum of Archeology & Natural History, Northern Cyprus); not examined. Paratypes 2 (private collection of Patrick Vollmer); not examined. Paratypes 1ɗ1Ψ (Phyllodrom zoo collection, Leipzig, Germany); not examined.
Additional material examined: CYPRUS: 3Ψ ( ZMB); 1ɗ ( ZMB 47179); 1ɗ ( ZMB 47180); 1Ψ ( BMNH) 17.XII.1952; 3ɗ1Ψ and 1 imm. ( NMW 101) Katschy leg., 5.I.1862; 4ɗ4Ψ ( ZMB 32236); Larnaca: 4Ψ ( BMNH) C. Glasznes leg.; 2Ψ ( HNHM) Glaszer leg.; Nicosia: 2ɗ2Ψ and 2 imms. ( BMNH) Dept. Agriculture; 2ɗ1Ψ ( BMNH) H. Guillermand leg.
Diagnosis: Males differ from those of C. concolor by the morphology of the tibial apophysis ( Figs. 13– 14 View FIGURES 11 – 18 ) and palpal bulb ( Figs. 15–17 View FIGURES 11 – 18 ) and from those of C. olivaceum by the retrolateral branch of tibial apophysis being narrower, shorter and bearing 10 spines or fewer ( Figs. 13–14 View FIGURES 11 – 18 ). Females are distinguished by spermathecal morphology which comprise two very long, thin receptacula surmounted by a single terminal lobe ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 11 – 18 ).
Description: Male (holotype, NMW 18253). Total length 11.4. Carapace length 5.1, width 4.4. Eye tubercle length 0.6, width 0.8; anterior row procurved, posterior recurved, clypeus absent. Labium length 0.6, width 1.0. Sternum length 2.5, width 1.4. Chelicerae with 9 teeth of similar size on promargin. Labium as wide as long with 27 cuspules. Maxillae with ca. 80 cuspules on inner angle. Sternum oval, slightly longer than wide. Fovea transverse. Palp: femur 2.9/ patella 1.8/ tibia 2.3/ cymbium 0.9/ total 7.9. Legs I: femur 4.3/ patella 2.8/ tibia 3.4/ metatarsus 2.6/ tarsus 1.8/ total 14.9. II: 3.9/ 2.4/ 2.7/ 2.5/ 1.8/ 13.3. III: 3.4/ 1.9/ 2.2/ 2.8/ 1.8/ 12.1. IV: 4.5/ 2.3/ 3.6/ 4.1/ 2.3/ 16.8. Spines. Palp: tibia (p) 0–2–1. Legs: I: tibia (v) 1–2–1, (p) 0–0– 1, metatarsus (v) 0–0–ap 1. II: tibia (v) 2–1–ap3, (p) 0–0–1, metatarsus (v) 0–2–ap1, (p) 0–1–0. III: patella (p) 1, tibia (v) 3–3–ap2, (p) 0–1–0, (r) 1–1–0, metatarsus (v) 3–2–ap3, (p) 1–1–1, (r) 0–1– 1. IV: tibia (v) 2–3–ap2, (r) 1–1–0, metatarsus (v) 2–2–ap3, (p) 0–1–1, (r) 0–1–1. Palpal bulb with long, thin embolus, inserted proximaly on tegulum ( Figs. 15–17 View FIGURES 11 – 18 ). Tibial apophysis ( Figs. 13–14 View FIGURES 11 – 18 ) comprising two branches: prolateral branch short with adjacent spine; retrolateral branch slightly curved, distal and proximal portion same width. Metatarsus I slightly curved, bends over retrolateral branch. Metatarsal scopulae extent (ventral surfaces only): I on distal three-quarters; II on slightly more than distal half; III on distal half; IV on distal third. Tarsal scopulae (ventral surfaces only): I–IV divided by longitudinal band of thick setae.
Female (paratype, NMW 18254). Total length 23.5. Carapace length 8.0, width 6.4. Eye tubercle length 0.9, width 1.3; anterior row procurved, posterior recurved, clypeus absent. Labium length 1.0, width 1.8. Sternum length 3.8, width 3.3. Chelicerae with 10 teeth of similar size on promargin. Labium as wide as long with ca.40 cuspules. Maxillae with ca.100 cuspules on inner angle. Sternum oval, slightly longer than wide. Fovea transverse. Palp: femur 4.2/ patella 2.6/ tibia 2.4/ tarsus 2.2/ total 11.4. Legs I: femur 5.5/ patella 3.7/ tibia 3.7/ metatarsus 2.8/ tarsus 2.0/ total 17.7. II: 4.7/ 3.2/ 2.9/ 2.5/ 1.8/ 15.1. III: 4.2/ 2.6/ 2.1/ 2.9/ 1.7/ 13.5. IV: 5.5/ 3.2/ 3.8/ 4.2/ 2.1/ 18.8. Spines. Palp: tibia (v) ap2. Legs: I: metatarsus (v) ap 1. II: metatarsus (v) 1–0–ap 1. III: patella (p) 1, tibia (v) 1–2–ap2, (p) 0–1–0, (r) 0–1–0, metatarsus (v) 2–1–ap3, (p) 0–1–1, (r) 0–1– 1. IV: tibia (v) 2–2–ap2, (r) 1–1–0, metatarsus (v) 2–1–ap3, (p) 0–1–1, (r) 0–1–1. Spermathecae comprising two straight receptacula with single apical termini ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 11 – 18 ). Metatarsal scopulae extent (ventral surfaces only): I–II along entire length; III on slightly more than distal half; IV on slightly less than distal half. Tarsal scopulae (ventral surfaces only): I–IV divided by longitudinal band of thick setae.
Distribution: Known only from Cyprus.
Ecology: Spiders were found in gardens under rocks, logs and leaf litter where they construct a silk-lined tubular burrow. C. karlamani occurs sympatrically with C. olivaceum in Cyprus (V. von Wirth pers. comm.). Males are mature from January to March.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Chaetopelma karlamani Vollmer 1997
Guadanucci, José Paulo L. & Gallon, Richard C. 2008 |
Chaetopelma karlamani
Vollmer 1997: 5 |