Chenopodium acerifolium Andrzejowski (1862: 132)

Mosyakin, Sergei L., 2017, Notes on taxonomy and nomenclature of Chenopodium acerifolium and C. betaceum (C. strictum auct.) (Chenopodiaceae), Phytotaxa 324 (2), pp. 139-154 : 142

Chenopodium acerifolium Andrzejowski (1862: 132) .

Lectotype 1 (designated by Sukhorukov 2014: 227):— UKRAINE: City of Kyiv (Kiev), islands of the Dnipro (Dnieper) River [probably Trukhaniv Island— S. M.], “Herb. Fischer. Chenopodium acerifolium Andrz. In ins. Borystheni Kiioviae. Herb. W. Besser” ( LE!, s.n.).

Epitype (designated here): KW-001002780!( Fig. 1 ; image of the epitype available at https://plants.jstor.org/stable/10.5555/al.ap.specimen. kw001002780); isolectotype: KW-001002781! (image of the isolectotype available at https://plants.jstor.org/stable/10.5555/al.ap. specimen.kw001002781).

Protologue: — “ad Hyp. Savrań, in insulis Borysthenicis Kief ” [now Savran’ (Саврань in Ukrainian) on the Southern Buh River (Hypanis in Latin, a name of Greek origin; Південний Буг in Ukrainian ) in Savran’ District , Odesa (Odessa) Region; and the City of Kyiv (Київ in Ukrainian)] .

= Chenopodium album L. var. hastatum Klinggraeff (1866: 130) ≡ C. hastatum (C. Klinggr.) Murr (1902: 360) , nom. illeg. (later homonym: Art. 53.1 of ICN) non C. hastatum Philippi (1860: 47) ≡ C. album L. subsp. hastastum (C. Klinggr.) Murr (1904: 291) ≡ C. album L. var. klinggraeffii Abromeit (in Abromeit et al. 1917: 712), nom. illeg. (Arts. 52.1 and 52.2 of ICN) ≡ C. klinggraeffii Aellen (1929b: 159) .

Lectotype [designated by Uotila & Lomonosova 2016: 233: “Westpreussen, Montauer Spitze, Sept. 1850, C. J. v. Klinggraeff ( G!, Herbarium Aellen, fragment, provided by Aellen with a note “ Typus ”)”]:— POLAND: [Województwo Pomorskie, near Gdańsk] Cypel Mątowski (also Narożnik Mątowski, formerly Montauer Spitze) ( G!).

Protologue:—“häufig an den Weichselufern!” (translation: “often on the banks of the Vistula!”).

Notes: —For comparison, I provide here the published original description of C. acerifolium and descriptions on the labels of the epitype and isolectotype.

Published description ( Andrzejowski 1862: 132): “Caete [a typo—should be “Laete”, meaning “light [green]”— S.M.] virens, caule simplici, foliis rhombeis trilobis, acutis sinuato-dentatis summis, lanceolatis, subintegerrimis [misplaced comma—should be “ acutis sinuato-dentatis, summis lanceolatis, subintegerrimis ”—S.M.], racemis aphyllis, glomerulis densis, aphyllis, seminibus exiguis laevibus opacis; ad Hyp. Savrań, in insulis Borysthenicis Kief. Panicula stricta”.

Labels, KW-001002780 (epitype): (Label 1, with description by Andrzejowski) “ Chenopodium acerifolium Andrz. foliis rhombeis acutis trilobis dentatis, superioribus lanceolatis, spicis subaphyllis sinuato dentatis acutis, summis subintegerrimis lanceolatis, racemis laxis aphyllis erectis, seminibus laevibus nitidis opacis [“ nitidis ” crossed out in darker ink, “ opacis ” added—S.M.]. In insulis Kief 35 [1835—S.M.]”. (Label 2, curatorial, not by Andrzejowski) “ Chenopodium acerifolium Andrz. C. albi L. var.? Herb. univers. №6642. Circa Kioviam leg. Andrzejowsky, in insulis”.

Label, KW-001002781 (isolectotype): “ Chenopodium acerifolium Nob. laete virens, fol. rhombeis trilobis, sinuato dentatis acutis, summis subintegerrimis lanceolatis, racemis laxis aphyllis erectis, seminibus exiguis opacis laevibus. In insulis Kief 35 [1835—S.M.]”.

1 Apparently lost lectotype: “ Chenopodium acerifolium Andrz. Ins. Borysthenicis , Kiev A. 38.” (formerly in KW) ( Dvořák 1987: 562).

Figures

FIGURE 1. Epitype of Chenopodium acerifolium Andrz. (KW-001002780!).