Biprocessa, Meng, Ze-Hong & Yang, Mao-Fa, 2015
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4039.3.10 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D2F92893-8913-4303-941C-9A91D34C88E9 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6103040 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E887BF-FFC4-FFC5-39CF-FA3F9FF7FC4F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Biprocessa |
status |
gen. nov. |
Biprocessa View in CoL gen. nov. ( Figs 1–21 View FIGURES 1 – 13 View FIGURES 14 – 21 )
Type species: Atkinsoniella jiaoi Yang & Li, 2005 , here designated.
Diagnosis. The new genus can be recognized by the following combination of features: (1) male pygofer ( Figs 2 View FIGURES 1 – 13 and 15 View FIGURES 14 – 21 ) with dense microsetae basiventrally. Pygofer process geniculate, extending posterodorsally, apical half segmented distinctly; (2) aedeagus ( Figs 4–5 View FIGURES 1 – 13 , 17–18 View FIGURES 14 – 21 ) stubby; (3) paraphysis ( Figs 4–5 View FIGURES 1 – 13 , 17–19 View FIGURES 14 – 21 ) slender, in lateral view ventral margin angulate, in ventral view apical portion truncate; (4) style ( Figs 7 View FIGURES 1 – 13 and 21 View FIGURES 14 – 21 ) short, not extended posteriorly beyond stalk of connective, preapical lobe developed.
Description. Length. 7.2–7.6mm.
Coloration. Body pale to orange-yellow, with black spots.
External features. Head anterior margin round; median length of crown less than transocular width; ocelli located on imaginary line between anterior eye angles; lateral frontal suture extending onto crown, attaining ocelli; distance between ocelli equal to or slightly more than distance to adjacent eye; frontoclypeus flattened medially, muscle impressions distinct; transclypeal suture distinct medially. Pronotum broader than head, disk with inconspicuous transverse concavity anteriorly; mesonotum with surface of scutellum slightly convex; forewing with base of second apical cell more proximal than base of third; hindleg with femoral setal formula 2:1:1.
Male genitalia. Pygofer ( Figs 2 View FIGURES 1 – 13 and 15 View FIGURES 14 – 21 ) gradually narrowed posteriorly; disk with long and short macrosetae, with dense microsetae basiventrally; pygofer process abruptly bent dorsally and extending posteriorly beyond acute apex of pygofer, clavate, whole process geniculate, distinctly segmented distally. Subgenital plates ( Figs 3 View FIGURES 1 – 13 and 16 View FIGURES 14 – 21 ) produced posteriorly slightly beyond pygofer, with uniseriate oblique submedial row of macrosetae and long or short microsetae on ventral surface. Aedeagus ( Figs 4–5 View FIGURES 1 – 13 , 17–18 View FIGURES 14 – 21 ) stubby, extended little or no farther posterad than paraphysis. Paraphysis ( Figs 4–5 View FIGURES 1 – 13 , 17–19 View FIGURES 14 – 21 ) slender, longer than aedeagus, in lateral view with ventral margin angulate on median portion, in ventral view, apex widened with pair of angulate lateral projections. Connective ( Figs 6 View FIGURES 1 – 13 and 20 View FIGURES 14 – 21 ) Y-shaped. Style ( Figs 7 View FIGURES 1 – 13 and 21 View FIGURES 14 – 21 ) short, not extended posteriorly beyond stalk of connective, apical portion curved and abruptly narrowed, preapical lobe developed.
Female genitalia (based on Biprocessa jiaoi ). Abdominal sternite VII ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 1 – 13 ), in ventral view, with posterior margin approximately transverse. Internal sternite VIII membranous. Pygofer, in lateral view, moderately produced, surface with macrosetae on posterior portion and extending anteriorly along ventral margin. Valvulae I ( Figs 9–10 View FIGURES 1 – 13 ) in lateral view, with dorsal margin of shaft approximately rectilinear behind basal curvature; apex of shaft acute and slightly curved ventrally; dorsal sculptured area strigate, extending from basal portion of shaft to apex; ventral sculptured area strigate, restricted to apical portion; ventral interlocking device distinct on basal 2/5 of shaft. Valvulae II ( Figs 11–13 View FIGURES 1 – 13 ) in lateral view, expanded beyond basal curvature, dorsal margin slightly convex, ventral margin approximately rectilinear; apex narrowly rounded, anteapical dorsal margin slightly concave and anteapical ventral margin obliquely straight; preapical prominence developed; dorsal margin of expanded area bearing about 20 triangular teeth; all teeth and dorsal and ventral margins of apical portion of shaft bearing denticles. Ducts dense, extending toward teeth and toward apical blade portion. Gonoplacs, in lateral view, expanded at apical half, surface with few setae on apicoventral margin.
Distribution. China (Guizhou, Yunnan)
Remarks. This new genus is similar to Atkinsoniella Distant, 1908 in some respects. Several species, such as A. albimacula , A. alcmena , A. chloritta , A. cuspidata , A. nigripennis and A. opponens , have long and strongly bent pygofer processes as in Biprocessa . However, in Biprocessa the pygofer process is distinctly segmented. Also, in the mentioned species of Atkinsoniella , the aedeagus is usually as long as the paraphysis, the paraphysis in ventral view is usually acute apically, and the styles extend posteriorly much beyond the apex of the connective. In Biprocessa , the aedeagus is much shorter than the paraphysis, the paraphysis is slender, in ventral view with pair of angulate lateral processes, and the styles do not extend posteriorly beyond the connective apex. Several species of Atkinsoniella , i.e., A. aurantiaca , A. curvata , A. cyclops , A. flavipenna , A. punica , A. rinkihonis , A. thalia , A. thaloidea and A. uniguttata , have similar color pattern with the species of Biprocessa . They are difficult to distinguish based on external characters, but can easily distinguished by the male genitalia features. In the above mentioned species of Atkinsoniella , the male pygofer processes are developed but not segmented; the aedeagus extends posteriorly distinctly farther than the paraphysis, and the styles extended much beyond the apex of the connective.
Etymology. The genus name is derived from “ bi -” and “ processa ” due to the two lateral angular processes on the paraphysis. The gender of the genus is feminine.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Tribe |
Cicadellini |