OXAEINAE
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/3893.1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E887D1-FFE0-2620-516E-A9B45A777CE9 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
OXAEINAE |
status |
|
PUPAE OF OXAEINAE View in CoL
Figures 45–47
Roberts (1973) described and illustrated the pupa of O. flavescens , and Rozen and Rozen (2010) described the male and female pupae of P. gloriosa . Pupae of the two taxa are obviously very similar. Indeed, all of the minute tubercles identified by letters on the pupa of O. flavescens can also be observed on pupal P. gloriosa except for “h,” a feature of questionable homology. The pupae of the two taxa can be distinguished because in P. gloriosa the dorsal surface of mesothorax in lateral view (fig. 45) has the scutellum projecting dorsally beyond the curvature of scutum, unlike the even curvature of the mesothorax of O. flavescens ( Roberts, 1973: fig. 7). With pupae of both taxa, the midlegs of females (fig. 46) have tibiae and basitarsi much thicker than those of males (fig. 47). Because of the close agreement of known mature larvae of the three oxaeine genera as well as that of pupae of P. gloriosa and O. flavescens , the pupa of M. nigerrima will likely be similar to those already known.
MATERIAL STUDIED: Protoxaea gloriosa : one male and one female: Arizona: Pima Co.: 5 mi E. Sahuarita, VII-27 & V-5, 1989, as postdefecating larvae, pupated VI-23-1990 (J.G. Rozen and R. L. Foster). Oxaea flavescens: One male and one female: COLOMBIA: Meta: near Puerto Lopez, Hacienda Mozambique , December 1, 1971 ( R. B. Roberts) .
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.