Heterogaster urticae ( Fabricius, 1775 )

Malipatil, M. B., 2021, Revision of Australian Parathyginus with description of two new species, along with first detailed description of aedeagus in the family Heterogastridae (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Lygaeoidea), Zootaxa 5016 (4), pp. 503-522 : 519-521

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5016.4.3

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:12204099-F6BB-4184-BFB9-7BFE5C214BDF

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5222534

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E91564-FF9A-9729-47C3-5F53FD66FB2C

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Heterogaster urticae ( Fabricius, 1775 )
status

 

Aedeagus of Heterogaster urticae ( Fabricius, 1775) View in CoL

( Figs. 56–61 View FIGURES 56–59 View FIGURES 60 & 61 )

Specimens examined. 2 males, Czech Republic, “ Moravia, mar. 30.5.1975, Konice u Znojma 11/75, Popicky vrch, 290 m, lgt. J. L. Stehlik ”, “ Collectio J. L. Stehlik Mor. museum, Brno”, “ Heterogaster urticae (Fabricius) det J.L. Stehlik 1976”, in VAIC .

Ashlock (1957) provided notes on the phallus of Heterogastridae without being able to successfully inflate the inflatable parts of the endosoma of representatives of the family. His notes were therefore based on Servedei (1951) who had described and figured the phallotheca and part of the inflatable portions of the endosoma of Heterogaster urticae (Fabricius) . On close examination I find this figure, reproduced in Schuh & Weirauch (2020), rather inaccurate since it was based on an incompletely inflated portion of endosoma. Therefore, a detailed corrected figure and description of aedeagus of this species, along with those Parathyginus species included in the present contribution, are given as the first representatives of the family Heterogastridae .

Following Ashlock, Henry (1997) scored the character and states in his matrix table and interpreted “not inflatable conjunctiva” as derived, a major character grouping Heterogastridae with the family Pachygronthidae in his cladistic analysis of the Lygaeoidea. Considering the present study, the foresaid character needs to be reassessed and rescored, and its implications on the relationships of these and related families be reviewed.

In the present study, I successfully and fully inflated the endosoma (conjunctiva + vesica) to provide the following detailed description.

The basal plate (articulatory apparatus) ( Fig. 56 View FIGURES 56–59 ), only partly fused with the highly sclerotized and pigmented phallotheca ( Fig. 57 View FIGURES 56–59 , ph). The phallotheca in upper view ( Fig. 58 View FIGURES 56–59 ), with antero-lateral margins of distal end produced to sclerotized arm like processes, area between the arms, where the conjunctiva attaches ( Fig. 57 View FIGURES 56–59 , co), is slightly less pigmented in pattern seen in Fig. 58 View FIGURES 56–59 ; in lateral view the phallotheca ( Fig. 57 View FIGURES 56–59 , ph), lower surface (facing apodeme surface within pygophore) is uniformly but strongly curved, however the upper surface is rather bulbous and conspicuously constricted in distal 1/3. The conjunctiva ( Fig. 57 View FIGURES 56–59 , co) is membranous, tubular and of slightly variable girth notably in distal half, extremely long about 4 times the length of phallotheca and about 5 times the length of vesica ( Fig. 57 View FIGURES 56–59 , ve), sharply turned at a couple of places, the sharper turn seen at about half its length, and appears to have a pair of large membranous lobes ( Fig. 59 View FIGURES 56–59 , cl), on its wall towards distal end, but lacking any processes. The seminal duct (ductus seminis) ( Figs. 60, 61 View FIGURES 60 & 61 , sd) is not clearly visible through most of the length of the conjunctiva, but becomes distinct near ejaculatory reservoir ( Fig. 60 View FIGURES 60 & 61 , er); ejaculatory reservoir is modified to heavily pigmented and sclerotized body and neck undifferentiated from vesical seminal duct, with traces of wings appearing to be distinct ( Fig. 60 View FIGURES 60 & 61 ); the seminal duct in vesica continues as a heavily pigmented and sclerotized narrow parallel sided plate that is gradually curved ventrally to end as a complex structure comprising gonoporal process and associated parts ( Fig. 60, 61 View FIGURES 60 & 61 ); vesica ( Fig. 57 View FIGURES 56–59 , ve) short, tubular and appearing to possess one asymmetrical membranous lobe ( Fig. 59 View FIGURES 56–59 , vl) near its base, but lacking any processes.

In summary, based on the dissections of Heterogaster urticae and the included species of Parathyginus the following comments may be made in relation to the aedeagal features. The conjunctiva is unusually long (about 5 times) compared to the vesica; the ejaculatory reservoir is highly modified and often greatly reduced; the vesica is short and tubular, with or without membranous lobes, but lacking any processes; and the vesical seminal duct is highly modified, gradually bending ventrally to end as a complex structure comprising gonoporal process and associated parts. A comprehensive review however of these unusual features in the family Heterogastridae and the related taxa is beyond the scope of this paper.

VAIC

Victorian Agricultural Insect Collection

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF