Eoophyla hamalis ( Snellen, 1876 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11865/zs.201925 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FB51BD4E-C28E-4BC1-B69D-44C16E663375 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5544422 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E96576-FFE4-9141-5C9B-F961FF35FE9E |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Eoophyla hamalis ( Snellen, 1876 ) |
status |
|
Eoophyla hamalis ( Snellen, 1876)
Oligostigma hamalis Snellen, 1876 , Tijdschr. Ent., 19: 192, 199. Type-locality: Dharmsala, India.
Eoophyla hamalis: Speidel, 1984 , Neue Ent. Nachr., 12: 37; Speidel & Mey, 1999a, Tijds. v. Ent., 142: 130; Li, You & Wang, 2003, Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica, 28(2): 299.
Diagnosis. The species can be easily distinguished from others by its female genitalia has the signa completely reduced and its male genitalia has three strong specialized setae no longer than half of valva ( Speidel, 1984).
Material examined. None.
Remarks. Speidel revised the Palaearctic Acentropinae in 1984. In the paper, he firstly reported the genitalia of E. hamalis and treated “ Aulacodes ochripicta ” of Caradja (1927) from Sichuan as the misidentification of E. hamalis . The species is characteristic by its three specialized setae shorter than half of the valva. However, we did not find any materials in accord with the character. We doubt that its record from China is not right, but keep the current status before more evidence is found.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Eoophyla hamalis ( Snellen, 1876 )
Chen, Fuqiang & Wu, Chunsheng 2019 |
Eoophyla hamalis
: Speidel 1984 |
Oligostigma hamalis
Snellen 1876 |