Guimaraesiella (Cicchinella) ambusta Gustafsson, Clayton
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4543.4.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4F591303-AF92-4BBB-8B68-EDD27AA229DE |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5936027 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C7BEC7B7-1EB3-4470-9776-759DD0632367 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:C7BEC7B7-1EB3-4470-9776-759DD0632367 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Guimaraesiella (Cicchinella) ambusta Gustafsson, Clayton |
status |
new species |
Guimaraesiella (Cicchinella) ambusta Gustafsson, Clayton & Bush, new species
( Figs 47–53 View FIGURES 47–48 View FIGURES 49–53 )
Type host. Leiothrix argentauris rubrogularis Kinnear, 1925 —silver-eared mesia ( Leiothrichidae ).
Type locality. Shiwan Dashan National Park , Guangxi Province, China .
Diagnosis. Guimaraesiella (C.) ambusta is not particularly close to any other species within the subgenus Cicchinella , but is superficially similar to G. (C.) philiproundi , with which it shares the following characters: (1) female subgenital plates with central rugose pattern ( Figs 22 View FIGURES 17–22 , 53 View FIGURES 49–53 ); (2) proximal mesosome roughly rectangular ( Figs 20 View FIGURES 17–22 , 51 View FIGURES 49–53 ); (3) lateral margins of preantennal head convex ( Figs 17 View FIGURES 17–22 , 49 View FIGURES 49–53 ); and (4) pns microsetae ( Figs 17 View FIGURES 17–22 , 49 View FIGURES 49–53 ). However, these two species can be separated by the following characters: (1) antennae sexually dimorphic in G. (C.) philiproundi ( Figs 17–18 View FIGURES 17–22 ) but not in G. (C.) ambusta ( Fig. 49 View FIGURES 49–53 ); (2) female subgenital plate reticulated in G. (C.) philiproundi ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 17–22 ) but with latitudinal striation in G. (C.) ambusta ( Fig. 53 View FIGURES 49–53 ); (3) mesosomal ventral sclerite with an anterior rugose area in G. (C.) ambusta ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 49–53 ) but without such area in G. (C.) philiproundi ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 17–22 ); (4) gonopore with complicated ornamentation in G. (C.) philiproundi ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 17–22 ) but simply crescent-shaped in G. (C.) ambusta ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 49–53 ); and (5) distal end of lateral concavity of mesosome with a comb-like structure in G. (C.) ambusta ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 49–53 ) but absent in all other species of Cicchinella .
Description. Both sexes. Head trapezoidal ( Fig. 49 View FIGURES 49–53 ). Lateral margins of preantennal head slightly convex. Dorsal preantennal suture reaches lateral margin of head, but does not completely separate dorsal anterior plate from main head plate. Head chaetotaxy as in Fig. 49 View FIGURES 49–53 ; pns microsetae. Coni broad, short, not reaching distal margin of scape. Antennae not sexually dimorphic. Gular plate broad, triangular. Thoracic and abdominal segments as in Figs 47–48 View FIGURES 47–48 . Reentrant heads of pleurites long and broad, often blunter in more posterior segments.
Male. Thoracic and abdominal chaetotaxy as in Fig. 47 View FIGURES 47–48 . Genitalia as in Figs 50–52 View FIGURES 49–53 . Basal apodeme comparatively short ( Fig. 50 View FIGURES 49–53 ), broad, rectangular. Proximal mesosome rectangular ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 49–53 ), with fairly straight lateral margins and flat ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 49–53 ) or slightly concave ( Fig. 50 View FIGURES 49–53 ) anterior margin. Ventral sclerite broad, blunt with rugose anterior end. Mesosomal lobes with strongly sinuous lateral margins. Marginal thickenings of lobes not displaced medianly in anterior end, but displaced medianly at concavity. Posterior end of lateral concavity of mesosomal lobes with distinct comb-shaped structure unique within subgenus. Large almost oval nodi with rounded anterior margins on distal mesosome. Gonopore crescent-shaped; 2 ames microsetae on each side near antero-lateral corners of mesosomal lobes; gpmes not visible in examined material; 1 lpmes microseta on each side situated in lateral concavity. Parameral heads irregular ( Fig. 52 View FIGURES 49–53 ), slanted. Parameral blades broad, tapering only distally; pst1–2 close together. Measurements (n = 4): TL = 1.21–1.30; HL = 0.33–0.34; HW = 0.33–0.34; PRW = 0.20–0.21; PTW = 0.28–0.31; AW = 0.43–0.53.
Female. Thoracic and abdominal chaetotaxy as in Fig. 48 View FIGURES 47–48 ; ss of tergopleurite VIII much shorter than ss of tergopleurites II–VII. Subgenital plate as in Fig. 53 View FIGURES 49–53 , with central latitudinal striation; cross-piece with moderate connection to subgenital plate. Vulval margin convergent to blunt median point ( Fig. 53 View FIGURES 49–53 ), with 3–4 short, slender vms on each side, and 6–7 short, thorn-like vss on each side; 3–4 vos short, slender on each side; distal vos anterior to vss. Measurements (n = 4): TL = 1.61–1.75; HL = 0.36–0.38; HW = 0.37–0.39; PRW = 0.23–0.24; PTW =0.32– 0.35; AW = 0.48–0.51.
Etymology. The species epithet is derived from “ ambustus ”, Latin for “scorched”, referring to the dark lateral margins of the abdomen.
Type material. Ex Leiothrix argentauris rubrogularis : Holotype Ƌ, Shiwan Dashan National Park, Guangxi Province, China, 26 Apr. 2005, S.E. Bush & D.H. Clayton, host MBR-6721, KU collection; Lice P-673 (NHML). Paratypes: 1♂, 2♀, same data as holotype (PIPeR); 2♂, 2♀, same data as holotype, except host TJD-6245, lice P- 674 (PIPeR).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |