Bush, Gustafsson & Clayton & Bush, 2019

Gustafsson, Daniel R., Clayton, Dale H. & Bush, Sarah E., 2019, Twelve new species of Guimaraesiella (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera: Philopteridae) from “ babblers ” (Passeriformes: Leiothrichidae, Pellorneidae, Timaliidae) with a description of a new subgenus and a key to its species, Zootaxa 4543 (4), pp. 451-497 : 453

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4543.4.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4F591303-AF92-4BBB-8B68-EDD27AA229DE

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5936003

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/78B1FAB1-AA95-4E64-8A2D-E9E0B52027B2

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:78B1FAB1-AA95-4E64-8A2D-E9E0B52027B2

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Bush
status

subgen. nov.

Cicchinella Gustafsson, Clayton & Bush , new subgenus

Type species: Guimaraesiella sehri ( Ansari, 1955) ex Trochalopteron lineatum lineatum (Vigors, 1831) .

Diagnosis. The subgenera Guimaraesiella (Guimaraesiella) and G. ( Cicchinella ) share the following morphological characters in common: (1) as3 absent; (2) pns present; (3) parameral heads folded medianly; (4) aps present on male tergopleurites V–VII; and (5) dorsal preantennal suture present, may reach ads, dsms, and lateral margin of head, and may completely separate dorsal anterior plate from main head plate.

However, Guimaraesiella (Cicchinella) can be separated from G. ( Guimaraesiella ) by the following characters: (1) female subgenital plate with cross-piece in G. ( Cicchinella ) ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 3–7 ) but without cross-piece in G. ( Guimaraesiella ) (fig. 360 in Gustafsson & Bush 2017 ); (2) gonopore clearly ventral in G. ( Cicchinella ) ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 3–7 ) but terminal in G. ( Guimaraesiella ) (fig. 358 in Gustafsson & Bush 2017 ); (3) mesosomal lobes absent or very small, not fused distally in G. ( Guimaraesiella ) (fig. 358 in Gustafsson & Bush 2017 ) but large and fused, often with conspicuous nodi in terminal end in G. ( Cicchinella ) ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 3–7 ); and (4) aps present on male tergopleurite IV in G. ( Cicchinella ) ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–2 ; except G. (C.) tenella n. sp., Fig. 97 View FIGURES 97–98 ) but absent in G. ( Guimaraesiella ) (fig. 354 in Gustafsson & Bush 2017 ).

Description. Both sexes. Head typically pentagonal ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 3–7 ); but general head shape differing between species. Marginal carina interrupted at least medianly. Dorsal preantennal suture reaches dsms and ads. Ventral carinae typically diffuse anteriorly. Ventral anterior plate present. Head setae as in G. ( Guimaraesiella ); as3 absent; pns present. Coni variable. Antennae sexually dimorphic some species (e.g. Figs 17–18 View FIGURES 17–22 ). Temporal carinae not visible. Gular plate generally triangular. Thoracic and abdominal segments largely as in G. ( Guimaraesiella ), except leg setae fI-v3, fII-v2, fIII-v2 present ( Figs 1–2 View FIGURES 1–2 ).

Male. Abdominal chaetotaxy as in G. ( Guimaraesiella ), except for aps present on tergopleurite IV in all species (e.g. Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–2 ), except G. (C.) tenella ( Fig. 97 View FIGURES 97–98 ). Male genitalia distinct ( Figs 4–6 View FIGURES 3–7 ), differing slightly between species groups. Basal apodeme rectangular ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 10–14 ) to rounded ( Fig. 43 View FIGURES 41–46 ). Proximal mesosome broad, typically much overlapping with distal basal apodeme. Mesosomal lobes large, elongated distally and fused distal to gonopore ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 3–7 ). Lateral margins of mesosome irregular. Gonopore ventral, often with elaborate structures. Ventral sclerite (VS in Fig. 5 View FIGURES 3–7 ) present, but varying in shape between species groups. Up to 2 ames sensilla or microsetae visible on each side near antero-lateral corner of mesosomal lobes. Up to 1 pmes sensilla visible on each side of gonopore (gonoporal posterior mesosomal setae, gpmes in Fig. 5 View FIGURES 3–7 ). Up to 2 pmes microsetae visible on lateral margins of mesosome (lateral posterior mesosomal setae, lpmes in Fig. 5 View FIGURES 3–7 ). Both ames and pmes are hard to see in non-everted genitalia, and may be easily overlooked. Parameral heads ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 3–7 ) folded medianly, typically irregular in shape. In most species there is a papillate area (PA in Fig. 6 View FIGURES 3–7 ) on the paramere distal to parameral head. Parameral blades stout, typically tapering gradually; pst1 sensillus and pst2 microseta or sensillus, both central, typically close together.

Female. Abdominal chaetotaxy as in G. ( Guimaraesiella ) except psps absent on tergopleurite VIII ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1–2 ). Female genitalia as in G. ( Guimaraesiella ), except complete cross-piece present ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 3–7 ).

Host distribution. Species of the subgenus Guimaraesiella (Cicchinella) are known only from hosts within three families of Old World babblers: Leiothrichidae , Pellorneidae and Timaliidae .

Geographical range. Southeast Asia.

Etymology. The new subgenus, Cicchinella , is named honouring Armando C. Cicchino (Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Argentina) in recognition of his long and productive career in phthirapterology. Gender masculine.

Remarks. All other members of Guimaraesiella (see Gustafsson & Bush 2017 ) are provisionally placed in the subgenus Guimaraesiella (Guimaraesiella) ; however, further division of Guimaraesiella into more subgenera may be necessary as more data on the morphological variation within this genus become available.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF