Guimaraesiella (Cicchinella) scottvillai Gustafsson, Clayton

Gustafsson, Daniel R., Clayton, Dale H. & Bush, Sarah E., 2019, Twelve new species of Guimaraesiella (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera: Philopteridae) from “ babblers ” (Passeriformes: Leiothrichidae, Pellorneidae, Timaliidae) with a description of a new subgenus and a key to its species, Zootaxa 4543 (4), pp. 451-497 : 463-466

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4543.4.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4F591303-AF92-4BBB-8B68-EDD27AA229DE

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5936021

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/796DD297-0BEE-44BE-9FF2-B04F98F1C22F

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:796DD297-0BEE-44BE-9FF2-B04F98F1C22F

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Guimaraesiella (Cicchinella) scottvillai Gustafsson, Clayton
status

new species

Guimaraesiella (Cicchinella) scottvillai Gustafsson, Clayton & Bush, new species

( Figs 23–30 View FIGURES 23–24 View FIGURES 25–30 )

Type host. Liocichla steerii Swinhoe, 1877 —Steere’s liocichla ( Leiothrichidae ).

Type locality. Wu-sheh , Taiwan .

Diagnosis. Guimaraesiella (C.) scottvillai is most similar to Guimaraesiella (C.) philiproundi with which it shares the following characters: (1) lateral margins of preantennal head convex ( Figs 17 View FIGURES 17–22 , 25 View FIGURES 25–30 ); (2) dorsal preantennal suture does not reach lateral margins of head ( Figs 17 View FIGURES 17–22 , 25 View FIGURES 25–30 ); (3) antennae sexually dimorphic ( Figs 17–18 View FIGURES 17–22 , 25–26 View FIGURES 25–30 ); (4) pns microsetae ( Figs 17 View FIGURES 17–22 , 25 View FIGURES 25–30 ); (5) proximal mesosome rectangular with fairly straight lateral margins ( Figs 20 View FIGURES 17–22 , 28 View FIGURES 25–30 ); and (6) gpmes situated on marginal thickenings of gonopore ( Figs 20 View FIGURES 17–22 , 28 View FIGURES 25–30 ). However, these two species can be separated by the following characters: (1) male scape longer than wide in G. (C.) scottvillai ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 25–30 ) but about as long as wide in G. (C.) philiproundi ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 17–22 ); (2) female subgenital plate reticulated in G. (C.) philiproundi ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 17–22 ) but not in G. (C.) scottvillai ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 25–30 ); (3) ames microsetae in G. (C.) scottvillai ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 25–30 ) but sensilla in G. (C.) philiproundi ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 17–22 ); (4) distal nodi of mesosome triangular in G. (C.) scottvillai ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 25–30 ) but trapezoidal in G. (C.) philiproundi ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 17–22 ); and (5) basal apodeme more slender in G. (C.) scottvillai ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 25–30 ) than in G. (C.) philiproundi ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 17–22 ).

Description. Both sexes. Head flat-dome shaped ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 25–30 ). Lateral margins of preantennal head convex. Dorsal preantennal suture does not reach lateral margins of head, and does not completely separate dorsal anterior plate. Head chaetotaxy as in Fig. 25 View FIGURES 25–30 ; pns microsetae. Coni short, not reaching distal margin of scape. Antennae sexually dimorphic ( Figs 25–26 View FIGURES 25–30 ). Gular plate broad, triangular. Thoracic and abdominal segments as in Figs 23–24 View FIGURES 23–24 . Reentrant heads of pleurites large.

Male. Scape as in Fig. 25 View FIGURES 25–30 . Thoracic and abdominal chaetotaxy as in Fig. 23 View FIGURES 23–24 . Male genitalia as in Figs 27–29 View FIGURES 25–30 . Basal apodeme slender ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 25–30 ), rounded rectangular. Proximal mesosome rectangular ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 25–30 ), lateral margins fairly straight. Mesosomal lobes with strongly sinuous lateral margins. Marginal thickenings not displaced medianly in anterior end. Large triangular nodi with oblique anterior margins on distal mesosome. Gonopore as in Fig. 28 View FIGURES 25–30 ; 2 View FIGURES 1–2 ames microsetae on each side near antero-lateral corner of mesosomal lobes; 1 gpmes sensillus on each side situated on marginal thickenings of gonopore; 2 lpmes microsetae on each side in concave section of lateral margin of mesosomal lobes. Parameral heads irregular ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 25–30 ), narrowing proximally. Parameral blades with bulging median margin, tapering only distally, and with distinct fold on median margin; pst1–2 close together. Measurements (n = 1): TL = 1.24; HL = 0.35; HW = 0.37; PRW = 0.23; PTW = 0.35; AW = 0.53.

Female. Scape as in Fig. 26 View FIGURES 25–30 . Abdominal chaetotaxy as in Fig. 24 View FIGURES 23–24 ; ss of tergopleurite VIII much shorter than ss of tergopleurites II–VII. Subgenital plate as in Fig. 30 View FIGURES 25–30 ; cross-piece with broad connection to subgenital plate. Vulval margin gently rounded ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 25–30 ), with 3 slender vms on each side, and 8 thorn-like vss on each side; 3–5 slender vos on each side; distal vos anterior to vss. Measurements (n = 1): TL = 1.58; HL = 0.39; HW = 0.41; PRW = 0.23; PTW = 0.35; AW = 0.54.

Etymology. The species epithet is in honor of our friend and colleague Dr Scott M. Villa (University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S.A.) in recognition of his work on the evolution of pigeon lice.

Type material. Ex Liocichla steerii : Holotype Ƌ, Wu-sheh, Taiwan [as Formosa], 1959, PF-6083 (OSUS). Paratype: 1♀, same data as holotype ( OSUS) .

OSUS

Oklahoma State University

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF