Ceutorhynchus ignitus, Germar, 1824
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5330204 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5398005 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EB3F00-C373-FFE2-FF5D-D1EEFBF37E02 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Ceutorhynchus ignitus |
status |
|
Key to central European species similar to C. ignitus Germar, 1824 View in CoL
1. Pronotum with visible, sometimes very small but distinct, lateral tubercles. Body broadly oval. ................................................................................................................................. 2
– Pronotum without lateral tubercles. Body slender. On Cardamine View in CoL . ................................... ............................................................................................. C. pandellei C. Brisout, 1869
2. Punctures on pronotum fine, on average less than twice as large as on head. Middle and hind femora with distinct tooth. ...................................................................................... 3
– Punctures on pronotum very coarse, mostly 2–3 times as large as on head. Middle and hind femora with minute or obsolescent tooth. On Cardamine View in CoL and Dentaria . .................. ..................................................................................................... C. pervicax Weise, 1883
3. Large species, body length 2.7–3.2 mm. White scales on sides of thoracic meta- and mesoventrite much denser and larger than those on prosternum and abdomen. Profemora with a distinct tooth. On Barbarea View in CoL . ..................................... C. barbareae Suffrian, 1847 View in CoL
– Smaller species, body length up to 2.6 mm. White scales on thoracic meta- and mesoventrite at most slightly denser than those on prosternum and abdomen. Profemora finely toothed or not. ............................................................................................................................... 4
4 Interspaces of punctures on head and pronotum microreticulate, matt. Elytral intervals slightly convex. Aedeagus rectangular in outline ( Fig. 4 View Figs ). High montane species. ........... ............................................................................................................. C. tatricus View in CoL sp. nov.
– Interspaces of punctures on head and pronotum shiny, without microreticulation. Elytral intervals flat. Aedeagus rounded or sharpened apically ( Figs. 5, 6 View Figs ). Lowland species. .. 5
5. Body a little wider (Fig. 3). Fine hairs on elytral interspaces shorter than width of one interspace, brownish. Ultimate apex of aedeagus rounded ( Fig. 6 View Figs ). On Berteroa incana View in CoL . ..................................................................................................... C. ignitus Germar, 1824 View in CoL
– Body a little slenderer (Fig. 2). Fine hairs on dorsal elytral interspaces as long as or longer than width of one interspace, whitish. Ultimate apex of aedeagus pointed ( Fig. 5 View Figs ). On Cardaria draba View in CoL . ...................................................................... C. merkli Korotyaev, 2001 View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.