Tylopus acuminatus, Likhitrakarn & Golovatch & Panha, 2016
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2016.195 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4EEA9AD1-5762-4A93-A189-CF185F64CBAF |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3852420 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C0DB482F-EE58-4385-9733-7D2E724DEFED |
|
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:C0DB482F-EE58-4385-9733-7D2E724DEFED |
|
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
|
scientific name |
Tylopus acuminatus |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Tylopus acuminatus View in CoL sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:C0DB482F-EE58-4385-9733-7D2E724DEFED
Figs 12–15 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig , 26 View Fig
Diagnosis
Very similar to T. jeekeli Golovatch & Enghoff, 1993 and T. parajeekeli Likhitrakarn, Golovatch, Prateepasen & Panha, 2010 , especially in its gonopod conformation, but differs in process h being higher and more strongly flattened, pointed, while the sternal lobe between Ƌ coxae 4 linguiform and larger.
Etymology
To emphasize the acuminate processes h on the gonopod; adjective.
Material examined
Holotype
LAOS: Ƌ, Ban Sin Chai, Boun Neua , Phongsali, 21°31'50" N, 101°51'45" E, ca 820 m a.s.l., 15 Oct. 2014, leg. C. Sutcharit & R. Srisonchai ( CUMZ).
GoogleMapsParatypes
LAOS: 1 Ƌ, 1 ♀, Phuthalang forest protected area, Boun Neua, Phongsali, 21°37'30" N, 101°55'55" E, ca 1125 m a.s.l., 16 Oct. 2014 ( CUMZ); 1 Ƌ, 2 ♀♀, Phufa, Boun Neua, Phongsali, 21°41'05" N, 102°06'35" E, ca 1470 m a.s.l, 16 Oct. 2014 ( CUMZ); 1 ♀, near Ban Borkhun, Boun Neua, Phongsali, 21°27'57" N, 101°47'20" E, ca 880 m a.s.l., 18 Oct. 2014 ( CUMZ); 1 ♀, Khoua, Phongsali, 21°11'55" N, 102°06'40" E, ca 840 m a.s.l., 15 Oct. 2014 ( CUMZ); 1 Ƌ, 1 ♀ ( NHMW), 1 Ƌ ( ZMUM ρ3059), Ban Na Thong, Namo, Oudomxay, 20°52'25" N, 101°47'00" E, ca 650 m a.s.l., 14 Oct. 2014; 1 Ƌ, Phagneung Phoukulom Waterfall, Sing, Luang Namtha, 21°07'15" N, 101°14'40" E, ca 900 m a.s.l., 13 Oct. 2014, all leg. C. Sutcharit & R. Srisonchai ( ZMUC).
Description
MEASUREMENTS AND COLOUR. Length 24.5–31.6 (Ƌ) or 24.3–31.5 mm (♀), width of midbody pro- and metazonae 1.98–2.6 and 2.95–3.6 mm (Ƌ) or 2.7–2.9 and 3.1–4.2 mm (♀), respectively. Live coloration dark brown ( Fig. 12A View Fig ); antennae and epiproct light brown; legs yellow-brown. Coloration of alcohol
material after one year of preservation faded to brown to yellow-brown; head, antennae, epiproct light brown to yellow-brown, legs and venter yellow-brown to light yellow ( Fig. 12 View Fig B–J).
HEAD. Clypeolabral region densely, vertex sparsely, setose; epicranial suture distinct. Antennae ( Fig. 12A View Fig ) short, surpassing body segment 2 (Ƌ, ♀) when stretched dorsally. In width, head <segment 3 <collum <segment 4 <2 <5–16 (Ƌ), or head <segment 3 <4 <collum <segment 2 <5–16 (♀); thereafter body gently and gradually tapering. Collum with three transverse rows of setae: 4+4 anterior, 1+1 intermediate and 2+2 posterior paraterga declined ventrad, with a small lateral incision at about midway; caudal corner very broadly rounded, not surpassing rear tergal margin ( Fig. 12C View Fig ).
BODY. Tegument smooth and shining, prozonae finely shagreened, metaterga smooth and leathery ( Fig. 12B, D, F View Fig ); surface below paraterga microgranulate ( Fig. 12C, E, H View Fig ). Postcollum metaterga with an anterior transverse row of 2+2, mostly abraded setae; posterior row barely traceable as 4+4 insertion points, these being better visible on segments 17–19 ( Fig. 12F View Fig ). Tergal setae simple and slender, about 2/3 as long as metaterga. Axial line traceable on prozonae and anterior halves of metazonae. Paraterga well-developed ( Fig. 12 View Fig B–F, H), especially so in Ƌ, set rather high (at upper 1/3 of body height), slightly upturned, but lying below dorsum; anterior edge broadly rounded and narrowly bordered, fused to callus; caudal corner very narrowly rounded, drawn behind tergal margin, increasingly protruding and pointed starting with segment 16 ( Fig. 12F, H View Fig ). Paraterga 2 with two evident incisions at lateral edge in anterior 1/3. Paraterga 3 and 4 each with two similar incisions at lateral edge, one in anterior 1/3, the other about the middle. Following paraterga each with one evident lateral incision in anterior 1/3 and, in pore-bearing segments, a very small denticle in the middle ( Fig. 12B, D, F View Fig ). Calluses on paraterga delimited by a sulcus both dorsally and ventrally. Ozopores evident, lateral, lying in an ovoid groove at about 1/3 of metatergal length in front of posterior edge of metaterga. Transverse sulcus evident on metaterga 5–17, incomplete on metaterga 18, narrow, line-shaped, rather deep, ribbed at bottom, not reaching bases of paraterga ( Fig. 12B, D, F View Fig ). Stricture between pro- and metazonae evident, wide and deep, ribbed at bottom down to base of paraterga ( Fig. 12B, D – F View Fig ). Pleurosternal carinae complete crests with a sharp caudal tooth on segments 2 and 3 (Ƌ, ♀), increasingly reduced and remaining a strong, sharp, caudal tooth on segments 4–8, retained as a small sharp tooth on segments 9–16, a minute tooth on segment 17 (Ƌ), or an evident, sharp, caudal tooth on segments 4–15, then remaining a small rounded tooth on segment 16, thereafter missing (♀) ( Fig. 12C, E, H View Fig ). Epiproct ( Fig. 12 View Fig F–H) conical, flattened dorsoventrally, with two evident, rounded, apical papillae; tip subtruncate; lateral pre-apical papillae evident, lying close to tip. Hypoproct ( Fig. 12G View Fig ) roundly subtrapeziform, setigerous knobs at caudal edge small and well-separated.
STERNA. Moderately setose and densely microtuberculate; cross-impressing shallow; an entire, linguiform, sternal lobe between Ƌ coxae 4 ( Fig. 12I – J View Fig ). A paramedian pair of conspicuous ridges in front of gonopod aperture. Legs rather long and slender, midbody ones ca 1.2–1.3 (Ƌ) or 1.0–1.1 (♀) as long as body height; Ƌ legs with prefemora distinctly swollen laterally, acropodites with particularly dense setae ventrally ( Fig. 13C View Fig ), but tarsal brushes absent.
GONOPOD. Rather simple ( Figs 13A – B View Fig , 14 – 15 View Fig View Fig ); coxa slightly curved caudad, sparsely setose distoventrally. Femorite slightly curved and stout, with an evident mesal groove and a clear distolateral sulcus demarcating a postfemoral part; process h prominent, evidently curved, pointed, with a small, but evident dorsal tooth and sometimes with a small ventral denticle ( Fig. 13A – B View Fig ); spine z pointed, sometimes small ( Fig. 15G View Fig ); solenophore (sph) large, expanded, flattened and typically coiled.
Remark
This species shows slight variations in gonopod structure, process h often being rather narrow to slightly broader, while spine z small to slightly broader ( Fig. 15 View Fig ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |