Phareicranaus spinulatus ( Goodnight & Goodnight, 1943 ) Goodnight & Goodnight, 1943
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.207840 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6186052 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EB8794-FF9D-FFC3-FF08-FE4E06F7BEA6 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Phareicranaus spinulatus ( Goodnight & Goodnight, 1943 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Phareicranaus spinulatus ( Goodnight & Goodnight, 1943) View in CoL comb. n.
( Fig. 18 View FIGURE 18 C, D)
Santinezia spinulata Goodnight & Goodnight, 1943: 9 , figs. 26–28 (male holotype, “ Colombia, AMNH”, examined); Pinto-da- Rocha & Kury 2003: 177, 197, 198, 202, 204, 205, fig. 51; Kury 2003: 99..
Diagnosis. Male genitalia. Ventral plate slightly pyriform;shallow cleft on distal border (corner prominent); lateral borders slightly convex on median region, with 6–7 long setae in line (basalmost longer), antepenultimate bifid and one small more internal (above bifid one). Dorsal process absent. Stylus straight, apex flattened apically, without stylar apophysis ( Fig. 18 View FIGURE 18 C, D). For the complete diagnosis see Pinto-da-Rocha & Kury (2003: 205).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Phareicranaus spinulatus ( Goodnight & Goodnight, 1943 )
Pinto-Da-Rocha, Ricardo & Bonaldo, Alexandre B. 2011 |
Santinezia spinulata
Kury 2003: 177 |
Kury 2003: 99 |
Goodnight 1943: 9 |