Aphaenogaster sicula Emery, 1908

Alicata, Antonio & Schifani, Enrico, 2019, Three endemic Aphaenogaster from the Siculo-Maltese archipelago and the Italian Peninsula: part of a hitherto unrecognized species group from the Maghreb? (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Myrmicinae), Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae (Acta. Ent. Mus. Natl. Pragae) 59 (1), pp. 1-16 : 7-10

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.2478/aemnp-2019-0001

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0EA032E4-230F-45DF-BDEB-6ACEA88AF418

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5062347

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EB87D5-FFBA-BC3E-FEA6-04E7FD773C46

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Aphaenogaster sicula Emery, 1908
status

 

Aphaenogaster sicula Emery, 1908  

Published records (excluding bibliographic checklists). As Aphaenogaster subterranea   var. subterraneo-splendida in EMERY & FOREL (1879) (type material – examined, see EMERY 1908) and as A. crocea sicula   in EMERY (1908) View Cited Treatment (type material – examined) and KUTTER (1927) (material examined).

Material under the name A. crocea sicula   in BARONI URBANI (1964) belongs to A. subterranea ichnusa   (material examined), those in BARONI URBANI (1968) ( material examined) and as A. sicula   in SCHEMBRI & COLLINGWOOD (1981) (material examined) belong to A. fiorii   stat. nov., those in SCUPOLA (2009) (material examined) and LI VIGNI (2014) (pictures examined) belong to A. trinacriae   sp. nov.

Material published in PETROV (2000) could not be examined, but was most likely misidentified ( KARAMAN 2011).

Type material examined. LECTOTYPE (here designated): 1 ☿ (top specimen of three☿☿ on one pin), 8.XII.1877 / Mt.Pellegrino /☿ // A. crocea   / sicula Emery   (handwritten) // Coll. C. Emery / Museo Genova // ANTWEB/ CASENT0904177 // LECTOTYPUS * / des. Alicata & Schifani 2018 // Aphaenogaster sicula   det. Alicata & Schifani 2018 [M. Pellegrino (PA), Sicily, MSNG].   PARALECTOTYPES: 2 ☿☿, same as lectotype on the same pin as the lectotype, plus // PARALECTOTYPUS //. 1 ♀, A. crocea   / sicula Emery   // 8.XII.1877 / Mt. Pellegrino / ♀ // Coll. C. Emery / Museo Genova // PARALECTOTYPUS / des. Alicata & Schifani 2018 // Aphaenogaster sicula   det. Alicata & Schifani 2018 [M. Pellegrino (PA), Sicily, MSNG].   3 ☿☿, A. crocea sicula Emery   // 8.XII.1877 / Mt. Pellegrino / ☿ // Coll. A. Forel // PARALECTOTYPUS / des. Alicata & Schifani 2018 // Aphaenogaster sicula   det. Alicata & Schifani 2018 [M. Pellegrino (PA), Sicily, MHNG].  

Additional material examined. ITALY: SICILY: Segesta (AG), Sicily, Italy, 1927, leg. H.Kutter ( KUTTER 1927) ( MZLS);   Pendici di M.Altesina, Nicosia (EN), Sicily, Italy, 37°40 ′ 22.19 ″ N, 14°18 ′ 38.62 ″ E, 840 m, meadow, 30.viii.1993, leg. A. Alicata ( AACI); GoogleMaps   Colle Vampolieri, Acicatena (CT), Sicily, Italy, 37°34 ′ 21.1 ″ N, 15°09 ′ 19.4 ″ E, 140 m, 11.xi.1993, leg. A. Alicata ( AACI, MSNM); GoogleMaps   Lago Arancio, S. Margherita Belice (AG), Sicily, Italy, 37°38 ′ 43.8 ″ N 13°03 ′ 49.9 ″ E, 185 m, meadow near the shore, 11.xii.1993, leg. A. Alicata ( AACI); GoogleMaps   Misilifurmi, Sciacca (AG), Sicily, Italy, meadow, 37°36 ′ 04.4 ″ N, 13°02 ′ 44.8 ″ E, 80 m, 11.xii.1993, leg. A. Alicata ( AACI); GoogleMaps   Ficuzza (PA), Sicily, Italy, 37°53 ′ 6.23 ″ N, 13°22 ′ 41.29 ″ E, 650 m, meadow, 18.ii.1994, leg.A.Alicata ( AACI); GoogleMaps   Baida, Scopello (TP), Sicily, Italy, 38°02 ′ 55.3 ″ N, 12°47 ′ 46.4 ″ E, 390 m, meadow, 1.iii.1994, leg. A.Alicata ( AACI); GoogleMaps   C.da Catuffo, M.Sparagio,Custonaci (TP), Sicily,Italy, 38°02 ′ 33.2 ″ N, 12°45 ′ 12.9 ″ E, 340 m, meadow, 02.iii.1994, leg.A.Alicata ( AACI); GoogleMaps   P.zo Giacolamaro, M. Sparagio, Custonaci (TP), Sicily, Italy, 38°3 ′ 18.70 ″ N, 12°44 ′ 25.08 ″ E, 660 m, meadow, 02.iii.1994, leg.A.Alicata ( AACI); GoogleMaps   SS118 Corleone-Marineo km 26 (PA),Sicily, Italy, 37°51 ′ 08.4 ″ N, 13°18 ′ 50.7 ″ E, 490 m, meadow, 19.ii.1994, leg.A.Alicata ( AACI); GoogleMaps   Gualtieri Sicaminò (ME), Sicily, Italy, 38°9 ′ 27.26 ″ N, 15°19 ′ 27.83 ″ E, 285 m, meadow, 24.xi.1994, leg. A. Alicata ( AACI); GoogleMaps   Lago di Piana, Piana degli Albanesi (PA), Sicily, Italy, 38°3 ′ 18.70 ″ N 12°44 ′ 25.08 ″ E, 600 m, meadow near the shores, 2.iii1994, leg.A.Alicata ( AACI); GoogleMaps   Pendici di M. Scalpello, Catenanuova (EN), Sicily, Italy, 37°33 ′ 5.35 ″ N, 14°40 ′ 54.84 ″ E, 840 m, meadow, 31.iii.1999, leg. A. Alicata ( AACI); GoogleMaps   Monte Pellegrino (PA), Sicily, Italy, 38°10 ′ 22.4 ″ N, 13°21 ′ 03.5 ″ E, 395 m, Pinus   reforestation, 12.iv.2016, leg. E. Schifani ( ESPI); GoogleMaps   Gole del Drago (PA), Sicily, Italy, 37°51 ′ 57.1 ″ N, 13°18 ′ 03.1 ″ E, 470 m, meadow near a degraded low Mediterranean maquis, 24.iv.2016, leg. E. Schifani ( ESPI); GoogleMaps   Erice (TP), Sicily, Italy, 38°02 ′ 24.8 ″ N, 12°35 ′ 09.2 ″ E, 700 m, meadow surrounded by Quercus ilex   forest and Pinus   reforestation, 04.xi.2016, leg. E. Schifani ( ESPI); GoogleMaps   Lago di Prizzi (PA), Sicily, Italy, 37°44 ′ 02.7 ″ N, 13°24 ′ 28.2 ″ E, 650 m, meadow, 22.v.2016, leg. E. Schifani ( ESPI); GoogleMaps   Grotta di S. Teodoro (ME), Sicily, Italy, 38°03 ′ 00.1 ″ N, 14°35 ′ 29.8 ″ E, 135 m, olive crops, xii.2017, leg. E. Genduso ( ESPI). GoogleMaps   ITALIAN PENINSULA: Platì (RC), Italy, 38°13 ′ 05.7 ″ N, 16°02 ′ 54.5 ″ E, 280 m, meadow, 16.xi.1993, leg.A.Alicata ( AACI, MSNM); GoogleMaps   Africo Nuovo (RC), Italy, 38°2 ′ 52.42 ″ N, 16°8 ′ 13.52 ″ E, 20 m,meadow, 17.xi.1993, leg.A.Alicata ( AACI); GoogleMaps   F.mara S.Venere,Samo (RC), Italy, 38°4 ′ 12.57 ″ N, 16°4 ′ 42.10 ″ E, 80 m, meadow, 14.iv.1997, leg. A.Alicata ( AACI); GoogleMaps   P.te Torr.S.Venere,S. Luca (RC), Italy, 38°08 ′ 42.9 ″ N, 16°04 ′ 43.8 ″ E, 80 m, meadow, 20.xi.1993, 23.i.2003,leg.A.Alicata ( AACI, MSNM). GoogleMaps   Bova (RC), Italy, 37°57 ′ 51.9 ″ N 15°55 ′ 21.5 ″ E, 380 m, meadow, 13.xi.2016, leg. E. Schifani ( ESPI). GoogleMaps  

Worker redescription ( Figs 5, 6, 10 View Figs 3–11 , 14, 15 View Figs 12–19 ). Measurements and indices (90 individuals, 14 localities): HL: 1.05 ± 0.04 (0.95–1.15); HW: 0.90 ± 0.05 (0.80–1.00); CI: 85.35 ± 2.30 (79.54–90.69); FW: 0.77 ± 0.04 (0.67–0.85); SL: 1.10 ± 0.04 (1.00–1.20); SI: 122.50 ± 3.43 (115.00–129.41); MW: 0.58 ± 0.03 (0.52–0.65); ML: 1.37 ± 0.06 (1.25 ± 1.50). Whole body ferruginous, yellowish in freshly emerged workers, except for gaster which is dark brown. Head darker, more brownish than mesosoma and legs. Head subrectangular, lateral margins under eyes slightly rounded, posterior margin of head slightly rounded. Anterior margin of clypeus gradually convex, mandibles rounded. Antennae with twelve segments, antennal club with four segments. Promesonotal suture only slightly marked, the two forming almost continuous dorsal profile in lateral view. In lateral view dorsal profile of metanotum is rounded, dorsal profile of propodeum mostly straight, spines variable, often slightly oriented upwards. Sculpture relatively weak and shiny aspect in general. Head finely reticulated with longitudinal striae mostly limited to lateral areas under eyes, sparsely present above eyes and variably on mandibles. Mesepisternum and propodeum reticulated with fine longitudinal striae, pronotum finely imbricate, gaster smooth, petiole and postpetiole finely imbricate to reticulate. Suberect and erect setae sparse all over head, decumbent setae on mandibles, adpressed setae on scapes and adpressed to subdecumbent setae on flagellomeres. Long setae extending down from clypeus. Erect setae all over dorsal surface of mesosoma, petiole and postpetiole, and all over gaster. Mostly adpressed, partly suberect setae on legs, with sparse erect setae on coxae and femora.

Male description ( Figs 22, 23, 27 View Figs 20–28 , 31, 32 View Figs 29‒34 ). Measurements and indices (5 individuals, 1 locality): HL: 0.60 ± 0.00; HW: 0.63 ± 0.01; CI: 105.00 ± 1.83; FW: 0.39 ± 0.01; SL: 0.17 ± 0.00; SI: 27.78 ± 0.48; MW: 0.69 ± 0.01; ML: 1.38 ± 0.02. Whole body brown, head and thorax sometimes slightly darker than abdomen, appendages paler than rest of body. Head subtrapezoidal, occipital margin rounded, anterior margin of clypeus presenting small concavity, eyes large and oval. Antennae with thirteen segments, antennal club with five segments. Mesosoma elongated, with anterior gibbous part formed by prothorax, mesothorax and part of metathorax, and posterior part comparatively flat formed by part of metathorax and propodeum. Promesonotal suture well marked, pronotum and mesonotum convex in lateral view, rounded on side. Metathorax arched, consisting of subvertical and subhorizontal part. Subhorizontal part, in dorsal view, becomes very narrow in proximity of subvertical part. Propodeum not much thicker than horizontal part of metathorax in lateral view. Propodeal spines are absent and only represented by two tubercles. Petiole elongated, petiolar node and postpetiolar node rounded, both dorsally present shallow longitudinal suture in center. Petiole in dorsal view presents significantly enlarged area between node and articulation with propodeum. Scape very short, covered by rare decumbent setae, decumbent to subdecumbent setae also present on head, mesosoma and legs, few erect setae on mesosoma, coxae, petiole and postpetiole and suberect to erect setae on gaster. Head finely reticulated, rest of body smooth and shiny.

Queen redescription ( Figs 37, 38, 42 View Fig 35‒43 ). Measurements and indices (6 individuals, 5 localities): HL: 1.35 ± 0.40; HW: 1.30 ± 0.02; CI: 96.33 ± 1.55; FW: 1.11 ± 0.02; SL: 1.22 ± 0.02; SI: 93.60 ± 1.55; MW: 1.24 ± 0.02; ML: 2.30 ± 0.04. Whole body ferruginous, with darker areas on gaster. Head subrectangular, lateral surface below eyes rounded, posterior margin of head straight. Anterior margin of clypeus slightly convex, mandibles rounded. Antennae with twelve segments, antennal club with four segments. Pronotum rounded in dorsal view, propodeal spines horizontal and with wide base. Petiole with long peduncle and node convex on both sides, postpetiole with anterior concave side and posterior slightly convex side. Entire head, except clypeus and occipital margin, densely covered with longitudinal striae. Long and more marked striae are subparallel to each other. Between them, less marked striae can be found often crossing each other. Mesosoma mostly shiny, with horizontal striae appearing in proximity of sutures, across propodeum and posterior faces of petiole and postpetiole. Adpressed to decumbent setae on antennae, suberect to mostly erect setae on head, dorsal part of mesosoma, of petiole and postpetiole and all over gaster. Long setae extending down from clypeus. Adpressed to decumbent setae on legs.

Systematic position. Aphaenogaster sicula   first appears as Aphaenogaster subterranea   var. subterraneo-splendida in EMERY & FOREL (1879), but this is a nomen nudum ( EMERY 1908). Consequently, it was then described by EMERY (1908) who considered it a subspecies of A. crocea   . Aphaenogaster sicula   was finally elevated to species-rank by SCHEMBRI & COLLINGWOOD (1981) on the basis of its worker morphology. However, SCHEMBRI & COLLINGWOOD (1981) based their judgment exclusively on misidentified material of A. fiorii   stat. nov. from Malta. Despite this fact, due to the degree of morphological differences from any other congeneric species, relevant in all three castes (see also comparative diagnosis), we surely agree to consider it a bona species.

Comparative diagnosis. Worker. The color pattern is unique among the sympatric species, having the head darker than mesosoma, both ferruginous, and the gaster very dark (somewhat resembling the Maghrebian A. strioloides   ). In addition, A. sicula   presents a very reduced promesonotal suture (especially different in comparison to A. trinacriae   sp. nov.) with a more convex mesonotum than A. fiorii   stat. nov., while still lacking the metanotal groove marked like in A. subterranea   s. l. in lateral view ( Figs 12 ‒ 19 View Figs 12–19 ). Moreover, A. sicula   is less sculptured than most similar species (except for example the very different A. crocea lenis Santschi, 1911   ) and its head appears shiny if compared to that of A. trinacriae   sp. nov. It is also a relatively small species.

Male. Only some of the Aphaenogaster   males present a mesosoma with an anterior gibbous part and a comparatively flat posterior part like A. sicula   . Among the sympatric species that do so, A. splendida   can be easily distinguished by different shape of the metathorax, forming a decisively slenderer area in front of the propodeum in lateral view (see EMERY 1908, 1916). Aphaenogaster sardoa   male ( SANTSCHI 1911) is larger, its metathorax does not form slenderer part in front of the propodeum, it possesses a visibly less gibbous anterior part and more abundant erect setae on the body. Aphaenogaster fiorii   stat. nov. and A. trinacriae   sp. nov. are the most similar, but do not possess the aforementioned slenderer part in front of the propodeum in the flatter part of the mesosoma. In addition, A. fiorii   stat. nov. is much lighter in color and presents more developed and differently shaped tubercles on the propodeum, while A. trinacriae   sp. nov. is distinguished by the well-developed enlarged flat areas on the sides of the propodeum (better observed in dorsal view). The shape of the mesosoma also distinctively separates A. sicula   from the somewhat similar Maghrebian species: A. crocea   (see CAGNIANT 1966), A. faureli   (see CAGNIANT 1969), A. mauritanica   (see SANTSCHI 1932, CAGNIANT 1987), A. nadigi   (see CAGNIANT 1987), A. strioloides   (see SANTSCHI 1932), and A. theryi   (see CAGNIANT 1986, 1996).

Queen. Among sympatric species the mesosoma shape in A. sicula   is only similar to that of A. fiorii   stat. nov., A. trinacriae   sp. nov. and A. subterranea   s. l. However, A. fiorii   stat. nov. is chromatically very different, and A. subterranea   s. l. is also often darker. Moreover, A. sicula   is unique for its short and thick spines. The scarcity of available information does not allow a proper comparison with the Maghrebian forms.

Distribution and biogeographical remarks ( Fig. 45 View Fig 45 ). Aphaenogaster sicula   seems to inhabit the whole Sicilian territory where the required ecological conditions are met and is also present in a small area in the southern part of Calabria. Further investigation is probably needed to establish its northernmost range limit. Land connections between Calabria and Sicily occurred relatively frequently during the later stages of the Pleistocene ( BONFIGLIO et al. 2002), and a Siculo-South Calabrian chorotype was established for the Italian fauna (STOCH & VIGNA TAGLIANTI 2006). Dispersion of A. sicula   most likely occurred from Sicily to Calabria. Its alleged presence in the Maltese islands was based exclusively on misidentified specimens of A. fiorii   stat. nov. as already mentioned. Finally, BARONI URBANI (1971) interpreted BERNARD’ s (1958) record of A. crocea   for Lampedusa as A. crocea sicula   but MEI (1995) considered the original record by Bernard erroneous and based on a misidentification of A. sardoa   . More recent collecting efforts only reinforce Mei’s hypothesis (ES, unpublished data; A. Scupola, unpublished data). A particularly aberrant record was published by PETROV (2000) for Montenegro (without any more precise locality), but it was most likely a result of misidentification ( KARAMAN 2011).

Ecology. Aphaenogaster sicula   inhabits clay soils, living in meadows most of the times, but also in garrigues or degraded Mediterranean maquis, and can also be found in Pinus   afforestations at low altitudes. Nonetheless, it is generally associated with open habitats. It is collected between 35 m and 840 m.

Conservation. Viable habitats for A. sicula   seem to be abundant in its distribution range. Unless a massive change in land usage takes place, the species should not face particular threats. In addition, the data here presented ( Fig. 45 View Fig 45 ) may represent a significant underestimation of its distribution in Sicily.

Biology. Monogynous (no more than one queen per colony detected in the wild).

Phenology. In captive colonies, sexuals began to leave the nest from the second week of July to the first week of August, but no attempt to form an actual nuptial flight was detected. In the wild it can be speculated that nuptial flights may start with the first relevant rains at the end of summer.

MSNG

Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Genova 'Giacomo Doria'

MHNG

Museum d'Histoire Naturelle

MZLS

Musee Zoologique

MSNM

Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Formicidae

Genus

Aphaenogaster

Loc

Aphaenogaster sicula Emery, 1908

Alicata, Antonio & Schifani, Enrico 2019
2019
Loc

Aphaenogaster subterranea

EMERY C. 1908: 7
EMERY C. & FOREL A. 1879: 7
examined) and KUTTER (1927)
1879