Mariaplax ourabay, Rahayu & Ng, 2014
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5353945 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4CF42744-861A-4635-9703-E6639CEBFAA9 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8627E9CA-C1F5-41ED-A381-78CA11827C26 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:8627E9CA-C1F5-41ED-A381-78CA11827C26 |
treatment provided by |
Tatiana |
scientific name |
Mariaplax ourabay |
status |
sp. nov. |
Mariaplax ourabay View in CoL , new species
( Figs. 2A, B View Fig , 41 View Fig , 42 View Fig )
Material examined. Holotype: male (7.6 × 5.4 mm) (RUMF- ZC-2114), Futami, Oura Bay, Okinawa Island , Ryukyu Islands ,
Japan, coll. Oura Bay Survey Team, 20 June 2009. Paratype : Japan: 1 ovigerous female (9.2 × 7.0 mm) ( ZRC 2012.1032 View Materials ), same locality as holotype, 22 June 2009
Diagnosis. Carapace subquadrate, about 1.4 times as broad as long, dorsal surface granulated; regions indistinct, H-shaped depression shallow medially ( Fig. 41A View Fig ). Eye small, slightly movable, cornea small, globular, narrower than peduncle, peduncle with scattered granules. Pterygostomial region with row of oblique striae and scattered tubercles. Third maxilliped ( Figs. 41B View Fig , 42D View Fig ) broad, ischium longer than merus, mesial margin straight; combined length of dactylus, propodus and carpus shorter than that of merus and ischium; exopod narrow, 0.4 width of ischium, flagellum well developed. Chelipeds ( Fig. 41D View Fig ) stout, unequal; major chela with slight gap when fingers closed, palm slightly wider than long, surface covered with tubercles; minor chela with narrow gap when fingers closed, dorsal surface of palm covered by large tubercles. P2–P4 relatively long ( Fig. 41A View Fig ); merus of P4 2.8 times as long as broad, shallow longitudinal median groove present; P2 with dactylus upcurved. Male thoracic sternum broad ( Figs. 41B, C View Fig , 42B, C View Fig ); sternites 1 and 2 fused, separated from sternite 3 by distinct ridge; sternites 3 and 4 fused; thoracic sternal groove short, extends obliquely from sternoabdominal cavity to middle of sternite 3 ( Figs. 41B View Fig , 42B View Fig ); sternite 8 exposed, rectangular, slightly longer than abdominal somite 1; sternoabdominal cavity reaches base of sternite 3. Male abdomen ( Figs. 41C View Fig , 42E View Fig ) relatively narrow; somites 1 and 2 free, somites 3–5 fused, lateral margin sinuous; somite 6 slightly shorter than length of somites 3–5, lateral margin expanded medially into blunt triangular projection; telson almost as long as somite 6, distal margin rounded, margin setose. G1 ( Fig. 42F, G View Fig ) slender, slightly S-shaped, sparse short setae on mesial and lateral margins; distal part tapered, not concealed under abdomen, exposed on thoracic sternal groove, obscured by setae of telson. Female abdomen relatively narrow, with 6 free somites and telson ( Fig. 42H View Fig ).
Colour. In life, carapace mottled pink and cream, with the branchial region darker pink, pereopods cream ( Fig. 2A View Fig ). Female lighter coloured than male ( Fig. 2B View Fig )
Etymology. Named after the type locality Oura Bay, Okinawa Islands, Japan. The name is used as a noun in apposition.
Remarks. The male telson of Mariaplax ourabay , new species, is almost as long as the sixth abdominal somite, a characters shared only with M. granulifera . However, the male abdomen of these two species differs in the length proportion of the somite 6 to that of the somites 3–5 (0.6 in M. ourabay versus 0.8 in M. granulifera ). Furthermore, the G1 structures of these two species differ markedly: M. ourabay has long, slender G1 with a pointed tip ( Fig. 42F, G View Fig ) while in M. granulifera , the G1 is stout and proximally much wider than the tip ( Fig. 36I, J View Fig ).
Type locality. Futami , Oura Bay , Okinawa Island, Ryukyu Islands, Japan .
Distribution. Oura Bay, Okinawa Island, Ryukyu Islands, Japan. Intertidal.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.