Hexapinus ceres, Rahayu & Ng, 2014
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5353945 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4CF42744-861A-4635-9703-E6639CEBFAA9 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/68A65B80-7CAB-46BF-97F2-66B47B0382B5 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:68A65B80-7CAB-46BF-97F2-66B47B0382B5 |
treatment provided by |
Tatiana |
scientific name |
Hexapinus ceres |
status |
sp. nov. |
Hexapinus ceres View in CoL , new species
( Figs. 14 View Fig , 15 View Fig )
Material examined. Holotype: female (5.2 × 3.2 mm) ( NMCR 39070 ), dive site at Basura , Anilao, Batangas, Philippines, 5 m, coll. H. Takakura, 22 August 2011.
Diagnosis. Carapace subquadrate, about 1.6 times as broad as long, dorsal surface granulated; regions indistinct, median depression shallow ( Fig. 14A View Fig ). Lateral margin with protuberance medially ( Figs. 14A View Fig , 15A View Fig ). Eye small, slightly movable, cornea globular, wider than tuberculate peduncle ( Fig. 14C View Fig ). Pterygostomial region with row of oblique striae. Third maxillipeds with outer surface tuberculate ( Figs. 14D View Fig , 15B View Fig ); ischium almost as long as merus, with rounded mesial margin; dactylus missing; exopod short, broad, more than 0.5 times width of ischium, flagellum well developed. Chelipeds slender ( Fig. 14C, D View Fig ) with slight gap when fingers closed. P2–P4 ( Fig. 14A, B View Fig ) short, stout, covered by tubercles; merus of P4 2 times as long as broad; dactylus of P2–P4 slightly longer than propodus, upper margin tuberculate. Female thoracic sternum relatively broad ( Fig. 14B, D View Fig ), sternites 1 and 2 fused, separated from sternite 3 by distinct ridge; sternite 3 separated laterally from sternite 4, appears medially fused, sternites 4–7 well developed, separated by distinct sutures. Female abdomen relatively broad ( Figs. 14B, D View Fig , 15C View Fig ) with 6 free somites and telson. Male unknown.
Colour. Not known.
Etymology. From the Latin “ ceres ” for grain; alluding to the granular dorsal carapace surface. The name is used as a noun in apposition.
Remarks. Although this species is known from only one female specimen, it can be placed in Hexapinus mainly on the basis of the form of the ischium and merus of the third
Rahayu & Ng: New genera and species of Hexapodidae
maxilliped ( Fig. 15B View Fig ), although the mesial margin of the ischium is relatively less convex compared to its congeners. Its exopod is also broad like its congeners although it is relatively shorter ( Fig. 15B View Fig ). It shares the pereopod condition with other Hexapinus species : the P2–P4 are short and stout with the dactylus slightly longer than propodus, and the merus of P4 is about twice as long as broad, without a longitudinal groove ( Fig. 14A View Fig ). A male specimen will nevertheless need to be collected to confirm the generic position of this species.
Hexapinus ceres , new species, differs markedly from H. latipes , H. latus , new species, and H. simplex , new species, in having numerous closely spaced tubercles on the carapace, chelipeds and P2–P4.
Type locality. Batangas, Philippines .
Distribution. Batangas, Philippines. Subtidal, 5 m.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.