Siccia diffusifascia, Volynkin, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.37828/em.2023.66.4 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:403D7F6A-9D69-4C86-87EC-B70B0DD14991 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13246071 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F5F5D64A-A5B8-42B5-9264-55546AF32EB8 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:F5F5D64A-A5B8-42B5-9264-55546AF32EB8 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Siccia diffusifascia |
status |
sp. nov. |
Siccia diffusifascia sp. n.
https://zoobank.org/ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:F5F5D64A-A5B8-42B5-9264-55546AF32EB8
( Figs 9, 10 View Figures 9–16 , 37 View Figures 37–40 , 55 View Figures 53–56 )
Type material. Holotype ( Figs 9 View Figures 9–16 , 37 View Figures 37–40 ): male, [South India, Tamil Nadu, Nilgiri Hills] “Nilgiris.” / “382” / “ Rothschild | Bequest | B.M. 1939-1” (bottom part of the last line is cut off) / QR-code label with unique ID “ NHMUK010292549 About NHMUK ” / “Slide | NHMUK014331256 About NHMUK ” ( NHMUK).
Paratype. INDIA: female, the same data as in the holotype, unique ID: NHMUK010292550 About NHMUK , gen. prep. No.: NHMUK014331257 About NHMUK (prepared by Volynkin) ( NHMUK).
Diagnosis. The forewing length is 11.5 mm in the male holotype and 13.5 mm in the female paratype. Siccia diffusifascia sp. n. is externally vaguely reminiscent of S. quinquefascia (Hampson, 1891) ( Figs 11, 12 View Figures 9–16 ) but differs clearly from it in the darker body and forewing ground colour, which are intensely suffused with grey, the diffuse forewing transverse lines, the larger, rounded and diffuse discal spot of the forewing (it is semilunar in S. quinquefascia ), and the brownish-grey hindwing with a larger discal spot, whereas the hindwing of S. quinquefascia is pale ochreous and medially and subapically intensely suffused with brown scales. The male genital capsule of the new species is substantially different from S. quinquefascia ( Fig. 38 View Figures 37–40 ) due to the distally dilated uncus (it is distally tapered in the congener), the proximally broader valva with a cucullus lacking the dorsal process but having a considerably longer, clawlike distal process, the swollen distal section of the sacculus, the narrower phallus, and the shorter and narrower vesica bearing a single thorn-shaped cornutus whereas S. quinquefascia has a series of markedly smaller cornuti. The vesica structure of S. diffusifascia sp. n. is reminiscent of the externally dissimilar S. cinerea ( Bucsek, 2020) ( Figs 15, 16 View Figures 9–16 , 39 View Figures 37–40 ) and S. likiangensis (Daniel, 1951) ( Figs 13, 14 View Figures 9–16 , 40 View Figures 37–40 ) due to the presence of a single cornutus but in the new species it is larger and situated distally whereas it is situated subbasally in both the aforementioned congeners. Additionally, the genital capsule of S. diffusifascia sp. n. can easily be distinguished from S. cinerea and S. likiangensis by the distally dilated uncus (it is distally tapered in the similar species), the cucullus lacking the dorsal and ventral processes but having a longer distal process, and the reduced distal saccular process represented by a swollen protrusion, which is thorn-shaped and dorsally directed in S. cinerea and S. likiangensis . The female genitalia of S. diffusifascia sp. n. are distinguished from S. quinquefascia ( Fig. 56 View Figures 53–56 ), S. cinerea ( Fig. 57 View Figures 57–60 ) and S. likiangensis ( Fig. 58 View Figures 57–60 ) by the more heavily sclerotised ductus bursae having lateral folds, and the very short appendix bursae, which is most similar to S. likiangensis , but in the latter species, the corpus bursae is significantly shorter and narrower, and bears an elliptical signum whereas the signum of the new species is elongate ribbon-like.
Distribution. South India (Tamil Nadu).
Etymology. The specific epithet refers to the diffuse forewing fasciae of the new species. The name is a noun in nominative singular in apposition to the generic name.
NHMUK |
Natural History Museum, London |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |