Pseudogramma brederi (Hildebrand in Longley & Hildebrand, 1940 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4111.3.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:89E9A206-8D5B-45D9-ABD9-4EC317610A23 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5691738 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EC87A4-FFAE-FFB9-64B9-84B730307339 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pseudogramma brederi (Hildebrand in Longley & Hildebrand, 1940 ) |
status |
|
Pseudogramma brederi (Hildebrand in Longley & Hildebrand, 1940) View in CoL
Confused Podge
( Figure 6 View FIGURE 6 ; Table 1 View TABLE 1 )
Rhegma brederi Hildebrand in Longley & Hildebrand, 1940:244 View in CoL , Fig. 11 (Exact type locality unknown, but apparently from the Hawaiian Islands; erroneously listed as being from the Tortugas as discussed by Randall & Baldwin 1997). Pseudorhegma diagramma Schultz, 1966: 193 (type locality, Hawaii).
Pseudogramma polyacantha hawaiiensis Randall and Baldwin, 1997: 42 (Holotype: BPBM 28742; type locality: Ke’ei, Hawaii).
Diagnosis. A species of Pseudogramma with modally 21 segmented dorsal-fin rays, modally 17 segmented analfin rays, a relatively long LL (1.6–1.9, mean= 1.8) in SL, relatively well-developed scalation on the interorbital, suborbital and dentary ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 C); head length 2.4–2.7 in SL, peduncle depth 3.2–4.0 in HL.
Description. Dorsal rays VII, 20–21 (rarely 22); anal rays III, 16–18 (rarely 18); pectoral rays 15–17; LL scales usually 34–39 (3 specimens with 31), LL length long, 1.6–1.9 (mean=1.8) in SL; usually no fully developed second LL (some tubed scales rarely present posteriorly); longitudinal scale series 47–52; gill rakers 5–6 + 11–12; vertebrae 10 + 16.
Body depth 3.2–4.0 in SL (mean=3.57); HL 2.4–2.7 (mean=2.5) in SL; snout 5.3–6.3 in HL; caudal-peduncle length 4.0– 5.9 in head; peduncle depth 3.2–4.0 in HL. Fifth or sixth dorsal spines longest, 3.3–4.8 (mean= 4.0) in HL; longest dorsal segmented ray 3.6–4.5 (mean=4.0) in HL; posterior dorsal and anal rays nearly reaching, just reaching or extending slightly posterior to vertical at caudal-fin base, second anal spine 4.2–5.6 (mean= 4.8) in HL; longest anal soft ray 3.2–4.3 (mean= 3.8) in HL; caudal fin short and rounded 2.0–2.8 (mean= 2.4) in HL; pectoral fins barely reaching or reaching slightly posterior to anal-fin origin (but not to segmented rays), 1.5–2.0 in HL. Interorbital width 8.3–20.0 (mean= 12.5) in HL.
Mouth large, the maxilla extending posteriorly to a vertical at rear edge of orbit; maxilla 2.0–2.3 (mean= 2.1) in HL; a band of villiform teeth in jaws; upper jaw with a small canine tooth in outer row on each side at front of jaw; villiform teeth on palatines in 3–5 rows in adults, the band distinctly longer than side of V-shaped patch of teeth on vomer.
No dermal flap or small tentacle dorsally on eye. Cephalic sensory pores as shown in Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 , supraorbital and some infraorbital pores variably present on head and may be absent or covered by scales when present. Tubular anterior nostril near edge of snout at base of upper lip, the tube not long, reaching one-third the distance to and almost to posterior nostril when depressed onto snout. A sharp spine projecting downward (30–60° to horizontal axis of body, mean= 50°) on posterior edge of preopercle at level of upper base of pectoral fin; upper surface of preopercular spine V-shaped with a central furrow. Three flat spines on opercle nearly in vertical alignment, middle spine closer to lower than upper spine (preopercular and opercular spines usually covered with scales).
Scalation on the head moderately developed ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 C). Interorbital scalation extending anteriorly to at least anterior border of orbits (pore InO2) in smallest specimens (below 40 mm), extending onto snout in larger specimens where scales reach level of posterior nostrils and N1 pore ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 C). Cheek scalation extending anteriorly to infraorbital pore IO C or IO B. Dentary scales extending anteriorly at least to first dentary pore (D1), some specimens with dentary completely scaled.
Color pattern. Based on photos of freshly dead specimens from Marquesas, Mururoa and Australs ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 ). Head brown with pale streak extending ventroposteriorly from ventral border of orbit, across preopercle toward upper end of pectoral-fin base; large black spot on opercle bordered by pale ring; anterior nostril short brown tube with pale stripe laterally; branchiostegal membranes sometimes with pale reddish cast; iris of eye brown with narrow irregular ring of yellow or orange bordering pupil; ventral border of orbit black. Body with mottled checkerboard pattern of alternating dark brown and tan spots. Fins dusky brown or reddish brown, caudal fin with narrow pale bar on base bordered posteriorly by half-moon shaped brown crescent. Color in alcohol essentially the same as fresh color, but without reddish tones.
Remarks. We name this the Confused Podge to reflect the confusion surrounding its type locality when the species was first described as an Atlantic species. Our analysis of mtDNA data reveal the presence of Pseudogramma brederi at the Marquesas and Austral Islands and there is a BOLD sequence from a Reunion Island specimen that clusters in the same lineage ( Fig.4 View FIGURE 4 ), which is supported by our examination of preserved museum specimens of this species from the Agalega Islands and Mauritius, Western Indian Ocean. We have found additional specimens of P. brederi at Taiwan, Ogasawara Islands (based on Randall et al. 1997: plate 6B, previously identified as P. polyacantha ), Johnston Island, Hawaii, Rapa, Fiji, Tonga, Loyalty Islands and Vanuatu. Pseudogramma brederi displays an interesting distribution pattern in the Pacific Ocean that, with the exception of the Marquesas, is antitropical ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ), with populations found north of 20 degrees N and south of about 19–20 degrees S latitude. Although the Marquesas are located in the tropics, Marquesan waters are influenced by upwelling that simulates a more subtropical environment. In addition, the species is currently known to have an east-west disjunct geographic distribution with a Central Pacific population from Ogasawara, Johnston, Hawaii, Marquesas, Australs, Tonga and Vanuatu and a southwestern Indian Ocean population currently known only from Agalega Islands, Mauritius and Reunion. We believe it is likely to be more widely distributed in appropriate subtropical habitats.
Material examined. TAIWAN: USNM 361831, 48.3 mm SL. HAWAII: USNM 160672, holotype of Pseudogramma diagramma , 67.5 mm SL. JOHNSTON ISLAND: USNM 140729, 18 specimens, 31.3–65.8 mm. MARQUESAS ISLANDS: USNM 409419, tissue number: MARQ-414, 53.4 mm; USNM 409417, tissue number: MARQ-417, 42.8 mm; USNM 409418, tissue number: MARQ-418, 55.0 mm; USNM 409146, tissue number: MARQ-146, 39.1 mm; USNM 409147, tissue number: MARQ-147, 54.5 mm; USNM 411305, 3 specimens, 46.6–52.0 mm; USNM 411461, 3 specimens, 33.8–45.1 mm. MURUROA, TUAMOTU ARCHIPELAGO: USNM 419833, 5 specimens, 37.6–52.0 mm. RAPA: USNM 379703, AUSTRAL ISLANDS: USNM 422967, tissue number: AUST-498, 49.3 mm. TONGA ISLANDS: USNM 334318, 51 mm; USNM 329736, 8 specimens, 34.1–52.6 mm. FIJI, southern Islands: USNM 287812, 3 specimens, 14.8–53.6 mm; USNM 258327, 3 specimens, 29.9–39.8 mm. VANUATU: USNM 356623, 47.3 mm; USNM 347531, 44.1 mm. AGALEGA ISLANDS, North Island: USNM 259061, 3: 37–44 mm. AGALEGA ISLANDS, CARGADOS CARAJOS SHOALS: USNM 259060, 2, 41.4, 53.7 mm. MAURITIUS: USNM 366584, 8 specimens, 12.9–39.9 mm.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pseudogramma brederi (Hildebrand in Longley & Hildebrand, 1940 )
Williams, Jeffrey T. & Viviani, Jeremie 2016 |
Pseudogramma polyacantha hawaiiensis
Randall 1997: 42 |
Rhegma brederi Hildebrand in Longley & Hildebrand, 1940 :244
Schultz 1966: 193 |
Longley 1940: 244 |