Acanthaspis celidota, Swanson, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4341.2.12 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:479EA688-B87A-4313-81F8-E829C4BDA940 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5998893 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03ED87A9-FFC9-FFEC-FF05-A9CBFA08FF62 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Acanthaspis celidota |
status |
nom. nov. |
Acanthaspis celidota View in CoL nom. nov.
= Acanthaspis maculata Sucheta & Chopra, 1989: 164 View in CoL . Junior secondary homonym of Acanthaspis maculata (Distant, 1903) View in CoL .
The relevant nomenclatural details for this name are summarized in Table 1.
Senior homonym: Junior homonym: Acanthaspis maculata (Distant, 1903) Acanthaspis maculata Sucheta & Chopra, 1989
1. Distant (1903b: 58) described Velitra maculata as a
new species from Burma.
2. Distant (1904: 277) redescribed Velitra maculata Distant, 1903 , referring to additional material from Calcutta.
3. Distant (1910: 194) transferred Velitra maculata Distant, 1903 to Acanthaspis , resulting in the combination Acanthaspis maculata (Distant, 1903) . In this treatment, he referred to the 1904 re-description as "When I originally described this species...", despite the earlier true original description of 1903.
1. Sucheta & Chopra (1989: 164) described Acanthaspis maculatus [sic] for a new species from India.
4. Maldonado (1990: 386, 456) erroneously treated the following taxa as distinct species: Velitra maculata Distant, 1903 and Acanthaspis maculata Distant, 1910 . The latter combination does not refer to any actual species-group taxon.
2. Kerzhner (1992: 59) noted the correct spelling for the specific epithet and drew attention to the homonymy.
Acanthaspis Amyot & Audinet-Serville, 1843 View in CoL is feminine, being derived from two Greek feminine nouns, ἄκανΘα, -Ης, Latinized acantha, ‘thorn, prickle, spine’ and ἀσπΊς, -Ίδος, Latinized aspis, ‘shield’. With the mandatory change in gender of the specific epithet ( ICZN 1999, Art. 31.2), Sucheta & Chopra’s (1989) name is a junior secondary homonym ( ICZN 1999, Art. 57.3), and it is here rejected. This species was described subsequently to either world catalog (i.e., Putshkov & Putshkov 1987, Maldonado 1990), and no junior synonyms known to me exist for this taxon. Thus, a new substitute name is required under Art. 60 ( ICZN 1999). Therefore, I propose Acanthaspis celidota View in CoL nom. nov. for Acanthaspis maculata Sucheta & Chopra, 1989 View in CoL . The epithet is derived from the Greek adjective, κΗλῑδωτός, -ή, -ον, Latinized celidotus, - a, - um, ‘stained, soiled, spotted’ and reflects the spotted pattern highlighted in the original epithet.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Acanthaspis celidota
Swanson, Daniel R. 2017 |
Acanthaspis maculata
Sucheta 1989: 164 |