Montistrongylus ingati, Smales & Heinrich, 2010
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1051/parasite/2023058 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DC25665A-E218-496B-974E-B813F69395E5 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13890389 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03ED87FE-FF8C-FFCB-271C-FC96FEA2FA56 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Montistrongylus ingati |
status |
|
3.3.2.1 Montistrongylus ingati View in CoL
3.3.2.1.1 Synlophe. The two male sections ( Figs. 3A, 3C View Figure 3 ) differ from each other and seem not to belong to the same taxon. In addition, they have two major differences with the female sections ( Figs. 3B, 3D View Figure 3 ): there are two sets of ridges in male versus three in female and, on the other hand, in the female sections, the axis of orientation is subfrontal ( Fig. 3D’ View Figure 3 ) and not oblique, as illustrated in the original figures. In the female proximal body, to be congruent with the female section at midbody, the section should be rotated ca. 75° counterclockwise ( Fig. 3B’ View Figure 3 ).
3.3.2.1.2 Bursa. From the original written description, the left ray 8 is longer than right ray 8 and the right lobe is slightly larger than left one. This means that Figures 63 and 65 are in dorsal view. The pattern is 2-2- 1 in the right lobe and 2-3 in the left lobe. The illustration of two types of dorsal lobes (Figs. 63 and 65) reinforces the idea that two types of males are present among the type material, i.e., probably two different taxa. We have no information to attribute the described bursae to a given type of synlophe.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |