Aporotritoma pulchra, Pecci-Maddalena & Skelley, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1649/0010-065X-75.3.629 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A8ADB30-7107-4C0E-9C11-6D1233F6210E |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EE0163-9745-3027-FF09-FA41E214FA59 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Aporotritoma pulchra |
status |
comb. nov. |
ApOROtRItOMa pulchRa (Say, 1826) , new combination
( Figs. 1–2 View Fig View Fig )
Tritoma pulchrum Say 1826 (1825–1826): 301.
Tritoma cincta Lacordaire 1842: 223 [not Tritoma cincta Arrow 1925: 135 , now Ortitma saggitae ( Boyle 1955: 544) ]. Boyle 1956: 126 [synonym of Tritoma pulchra ].
Tritoma dimidiata Lacordaire 1842: 224 . Boyle 1956: 126 [synonym of Tritoma pulchra ].
Tritoma basale Melsheimer 1847: 175 . Boyle 1956: 126 [synonym of Tritoma pulchra ].
Mycotretus pulchra (Say, 1826) . Crotch 1873: 354 [generic combination].
Mycotretus pulcher (Say, 1826) . Kuhnt 1911: 52 [misspelling].
Tritoma sellata Kuhnt 1910: 247 . Boyle 1956: 126 [synonym of Tritoma pulchra ].
Tritoma pulchra Say, 1826 . Boyle 1956: 126; Roberts 1958: 259; Martin et al. 1981: 140; Skelley 1988: 120; Goodrich and Skelley 1991: 35; Goodrich and Skelley 1994: 292; Goodrich and Skelley 1995: 148, 150; Goodrich 1997: 141; Goodrich and Springer 1999: 53; Robertson et al. 2004: 175; Majka 2007: 41 View Cited Treatment ; Skelley 2009: 4; Epps and Arnold 2010: 778; Webster et al. 2012: 172.
Diagnosis (n = 4). Body small (3–4 mm), subtriangular, widest at the base of elytra, glossy ( Figs. 1A–C View Fig ). Head: Antennal club with 3 antennomeres, antennomeres IX–XI distinctly transverse; epistomal apex weakly concave to truncate, complete clypeal marginal bead present ( Fig. 1D View Fig ); postmandibular lobes conspicuously developed, their lateral edges overlapping inner edges of eyes ventrally (similar to those of Triplax festiva Lacordaire and Eudaemonius tuberculifrons (Lewis) ; Fig. 2A View Fig , arrow). Mouthparts ( Figs. 1E–H View Fig ):Apical maxillary palpomere slightly asymmetrical, transverse-triangular ( Fig. 1E View Fig ); lacinia with a pair of hooks, with a V-shaped and narrowed separation ( Figs. 1E–F View Fig , arrow, similar to those of Mycotretus Lacordaire , Laurenticola Philipp , Triplax Herbst , etc.); apical labial palpomere slightly dilated medially; mentum elongate-pentagonal, latero-anterior corners not angulated and moderately rounded ( Fig. 1G View Fig ); mandibles with outer edge angulated ( Fig. 1H View Fig , arrow). Thorax: Procoxal lines conspicuous, forming a distinct elongate-triangular plate extending from the posterior edge of prosternal process to the middle point of anterior prosternal edge ( Fig. 2A View Fig ); metendosternite well-developed ( Fig. 2B View Fig ), laminae present, anterior tendons thin, moderately separated on anterior portion; metathoracic wings developed, apparently functional, vein rp-mp2 only slightly longer than vein r3. Genitalia. Male ( Figs. 2C–G View Fig ): Internal sac with well-developed flagellum ( Fig. 2C View Fig , fla), approximately 1.25× as long as penis; flagellar head laterally hook-like, anterior border with two long and strongly sclerotized lobes at middle, U-shaped, widened at base, narrowed apically ( Figs. 2D–E View Fig ). Tegmen sclerotized ( Fig. 2F View Fig ); outer edge of basal piece with a conspicuous and narrowed projection on each side ( Fig. 2F View Fig , arrow); parameres sclerotized, with densely pubescent outgrowths. Laterotergite IX narrowly separated and connected by a short sclerite (spiculum gastrale; Fig. 2G View Fig , arrow). Female ( Fig. 2H View Fig ): Gonocoxites and gonostyli narrow, elongate; spermatheca strongly sclerotized ( Fig. 2H View Fig , spe), distal portion of spermathecal duct strongly sclerotized ( Fig. 2H View Fig , spd), large, approximately as long as spermatheca.
Examined Specimens. For diagnoses and illustrations, 2 males and 2 females dissected ( CELC) with label data “ OKLAHOMA: Latimer Co, III– 1987, Karl Stephan [printed]” .
Type Specimen. According to Boyle (1956), the type specimen of Tritoma pulchra was presumably destroyed with Say’s collection (consumed by various insect pests, see Mawdsley 1993). Because T. pulchra is a well-known species and the only member of Aporotritoma in North America, no neotype is required because there are no current nomenclatural issues to resolve ( ICZN 1999, Article 75.2).
Biological Data. A list of host fungi of A. pulchra can be found in Goodrich and Skelley (1994) and this species appears to be a generalist. Epps and Arnold (2010) reported A. pulchra associated only with Tyromyces chioneus (Fr.) P. Karst. ( Polyporales : Meruliaceae ) in two sites in the Appalachian Mountains and foothills. This fungus species also is reported in northern Asia (Núñez and Ryvarden 1999) and it is possible that it is used by the Japanese species of Aporotritoma , a hypothesis for future verification.
Distribution. Aporotritoma pulchra is widely distributed in eastern North America from Nova Scotia south to central Florida, west to South Dakota and eastern Texas.
Known provinces/states and counties of occurrence: CANADA: New Brunswick – Carleton, Charlotte, Northumberland, Queens, Restigouche, Sunbury, York ; Nova Scotia – Inverness, Victoria; Ontario – Carleton, Chatham-Kent Division, Kenora, Kent, Leeds and Grenville United, Niagara, Parry Sound, Waterloo, Wentworth, York;
Quebec – Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Estrie, Montreal, Outaouais. USA: Alabama – Cleburne, Lee, Mobile, Tuscaloosa; Connecticut – Litchfield; District of
Columbia; Florida – Alachua , Leon, Liberty, Orange, Walton ; Georgia – Bibb , Bryan, Clarke, Fulton, Oglethorpe ; Illinois – Champaign, Clark, Coles , Cook , Grundy, Iroquois, Jackson, Wabash ; Indiana – Elkhart, Knox , Lake, Marion, Parke, Tippecanoe ; Iowa – Boone, Linn , Poweshiek, Story, Winneshiek, Woodbury ; Kansas – Doniphan, Shawnee ; Kentucky – [State Record Only]; Maine – Kennebec , York, Lincoln ; Maryland – Frederick , Montgomery, Prince George’s ; Massachusetts – Franklin, Hampden , Hampshire, Suffolk, Worcester ; Michigan – Chippewa, Delta, Grand Traverse, Lake, Leelanau, Marquette, Montmorency, Oakland, Osceola, Saginaw, Wayne ; Minnesota – Becker, Clearwater ; Mississippi – Perry ; Missouri – Boone, Cape Girardeau, Cooper, St. Louis ; Nebraska – Jefferson, Sarpy ; New Hampshire – Carroll, Coos, Grafton , Hillsboro, Rockingham, Strafford, Warren ; New Jersey – Essex, Ocean, Sussex ; New York – Cattaraugus, Earl Island, Erie , Herkimer, Niagara, Tompkins, Westchester ; North Carolina – Buncombe , Orange, Swain, Wake ; Ohio – Butler , Delaware, Fairfield, Franklin, Guernsey , Hamilton , Hocking , Muskogee, Ottawa, Vinton, Wyandot ; Oklahoma – Latimer, Muskogee ; Pennsylvania – Allegheny , Bedford, Bucks, Chester , Delaware, Lackawanna , Northampton, Philadelphia, Pike, Westmoreland ; South Carolina – Pickens, Richland ; South Dakota – Lawrence ; Texas – Erath , Milam, Montgomery, Sabine ; Vermont – Bennington , Washington, Windham ; Virginia – Fairfax , Franklin, Giles, Spotsylvania ; West Virginia – Pocahontas, Fayette, Mercer ; Wisconsin – Bayfield, Milwaukee .
Remarks. Chûjô (1969) mistakenly listed the Japanese species of Aporotritoma under Pseudotritoma Gorham. This error was corrected in the “Catalog of the Erotylidae ( Insecta, Coleoptera ) from the Old World” ( Chûjô and Chûjô 1990).
Aporotritoma pulchra matches the diagnosis of Aporotritoma (= “ Pseudotritoma ”) provided by Chûjô (1969) in possessing apical hooks on the lacinia, a triangular apical maxillary palpomere, narrow tibiae, and a distinct triangular plate formed by the procoxal lines ( Fig. 2A View Fig ). After studying the published definitions of Aporotritoma , we conclude T. pulchra is a member of the genus and transfer it from Tritoma to Aporotritoma , becoming Aporotritoma pulchra (Say) , new combination. Within Aporotritoma , A. pulchra is most similar to Aporotritoma consobrina (Lewis) in color pattern.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Aporotritoma pulchra
Pecci-Maddalena, Italo Salvatore de Castro & Skelley, Paul E. 2021 |
Tritoma pulchra Say, 1826
Skelley, P. E. 2009: 4 |
Majka, C. G. 2007: 41 |
Goodrich, M. A. 1997: 141 |
Goodrich, M. A. 1991: 35 |
Skelley, P. E. 1988: 120 |
Martin, M. M. & Kukor, J. S. & Martin, T. E. 1981: 140 |
Roberts, A. W. R. 1958: 259 |
Boyle, W. W. 1956: 126 |
Mycotretus pulcher (Say, 1826)
Kuhnt, P. 1911: 52 |
Tritoma sellata
Boyle, W. W. 1956: 126 |
Kuhnt, P. 1910: 247 |
Mycotretus pulchra (Say, 1826)
Crotch, G. R. 1873: 354 |
Tritoma basale
Boyle, W. W. 1956: 126 |
Melsheimer, F. E. 1847: 175 |
Tritoma cincta
Boyle, W. W. 1956: 126 |
Boyle, W. W. 1955: 544 |
Arrow, G. J. 1925: 135 |
Lacordaire, J. T. 1842: 223 |
Tritoma dimidiata
Boyle, W. W. 1956: 126 |
Lacordaire, J. T. 1842: 224 |