Paraxenylla norvegica, Fjellberg, Arne, 2010

Fjellberg, Arne, 2010, Paraxenylla norvegica sp. nov., the most northern species of the genus (Collembola, Hypogastruridae), Zootaxa 2384, pp. 65-68 : 65-68

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.193753

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6195807

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EE284E-FFF7-1D01-FF02-FC09FC732729

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Paraxenylla norvegica
status

sp. nov.

Paraxenylla norvegica sp. nov.

Figs 1–14 View FIGURES 1 – 8 View FIGURES 9 – 15 , Tab. 1

Type locality. Norway, Rogaland County, W of Brusand, N 58.53644o, E 0 5.70024 o.

Type material. Holotype, male (slide), labelled " Norway. Rogaland: W Brusand, N 58.53644o, E 0 5.70024 o, Ammophila roots on sandy foreshore, 10.ix.2009. A. Fjellberg 9.320". Paratypes: 2 (slide), 10 (alc.) from the holotype sample. All types deposited at Museum of Natural History (Entomology), Oslo. Additional material: 15 specimens collected in cow dung on the sandy foreshore at the type locality, 13.x.2009. A. Fjellberg leg.

Description. Body length 0.45 mm. Colour bluish grey. Eyes 5+5, of which 2+2 are smaller than others ( Figs 1, 7 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ). Antennae 0.8–0.9 as long as width of head measured from above. Ant I with 7 setae, Ant II with 11 setae. Ant III organ with two exposed short sensilla flanked on each side by guard sensillum, slightly longer than the short sensilla. Spineshaped sensillum present in ventroapical position ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ). Ant IV with four enlarged sensilla A–D, of which A and B blunt and cylindric, C and D egg-shaped ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ). In addition five slender, curved and pointed sensilla. Short microsensillum and subapical organite (buried peg) present between sensilla A, B, C. Apical bulb large and unlobed.

Labrum with 5,3,4 setae, apical four particularly long ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ). Clypeal field with four setae, prelabrals absent. Basal fields of labium with 4+5 setae. Labial palps with papillae A–E distinct, five guard setae present. Two small accessorial papillae (transformed guards) found between papillae B–D and D–E. Six proximal setae present ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ). Hypostomal group with 3 subequal setae (H straight, h1–h2 curved). Ventral side of head with 2+2 setae along linea ventralis. Mandibles unmodified, with granulated molar plate and four apical teeth ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ). Maxillary capitulum narrowed at tip, but the three primary cusps are distinct ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ). Two long ciliated lamellae (Lam 1, Lam 2) surpass tip of capitulum. A short ciliated Lam 3 present at base of Lam 2. Lam 4 distinct, ciliated. Lam 5 present at base of Lam 4 (proximal extension of Lam 4?). Maxillary outer lobe with simple palp and one sublobal hair.

Body with short setae, macrochaetae hardly distinguished. Integument with uniform small sharp granules. Sensilla only slightly longer than ordinary setae except on Abd IV–V where distincly prolonged. Chaetotaxy as Figs 1 View FIGURES 1 – 8 , 9, 10 View FIGURES 9 – 15 . Thorax with sensilla in position p4, seta m1 present, m2 absent. Abd I–II with a pair of dorsolateral integumental tubercles outside sensilla = p5. Setae of p-row unstable (missing or extra added). Abd IV with m1 and m3 present. Sensilla on Abd V in position p2. Abd VI without anal spines. Anus subterminal with ventral lobes separated only apically. No ventral setae on thorax. Ventral tube with 4+4 setae ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 9 – 15 ). Retinaculum with 3+3 teeth, no seta. Linea ventralis distinct, reaching the ventral tube.

Chaetotaxy of legs as in Tab 1. Tibiotarsi with A1 enlarged, acuminate ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 9 – 15 ). Claws without unguiculus, unguis without teeth ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 9 – 15 ). Furca fully developed, dens 2.5 as long as mucro, with two dorsal setae. Mucro separated from dens, curved, with very distinct dorsal lamella. Ventral side of dens smooth, without primary granules. Similar smooth fields distally on manubrium ( Figs. 12, 13 View FIGURES 9 – 15 ).

Discussion. In the last survey of Paraxenylla Queiroz & Deharveng (2008) separate the genus from Xenylla by a set of characters which involved modification of the mouthparts, terminal position of anus and absence of anal spines on Abd VI. Chatotaxy characters of antennae and labrum are less consistent. The new Norwegian species matches Paraxenylla by absence of anal spines and the subterminal position of anus, but the modification of the mandibles, maxillae and labium are less advanced. Development of the mouthparts are highly adaptive, in particular among marine littoral species, and the informative value of the mouthparts in generic diagnosis is questionable. Moreover details of the mandibles and maxillae are only known from a few of the nine recognised species of Paraxenylla . I therefore rely on similarity in the terminal abdominal segment for linking norvegica to Paraxenylla .

Tib Fe Tr Cx Scx 2 Scx 1 Leg I 19 12 5 4 0 1 Leg II 19 11 5 7 2 2 Leg III 18 10 4 6 2 2–3 The new species differs from all other Paraxenylla by the very distinct curved mucro bearing a high dorsal lamella. Other species have a stright pointed mucro with a narrow dorsal lamella at most. The type displayed by norvegica probably represents an archaeic type in Poduromorpa and may indicate that the species belongs to a plesiomorphic branch in the Paraxenylla complex. Presence of seta m1 on Th II–III is also a plesiomorphic character. Most species of Paraxenylla show the apomorphic condition (absence of m1), except for the two species sooretamensis and arenosa Uchida & Tamura, 1967. Also the position of the tergal sensillum at p2 on Abd V links norvegica to sooretamensis / arenosa, while other Paraxenylla have that sensillum in p4. The type of integumental tubercles found on Abd I–II in norvegica is not described from any other Paraxenylla . Similar tubercles are found in several marine littoral species and may serve to increase the buoyancy when exposed to water or to increase the amount of air trapped around the body when specimens are suspended in water due to wave action. Actual examples are: lateral lobes on Abd I–III in Hypogastrura viatica ( Tullberg, 1872) ; lateral tubercles on Th II–Abd III in Hypogastrura arctandria Fjellberg, 1988 ; the subcoxal lobe on last pair of legs in Xenylla humicola ( Fabricius, 1780) ; the apical lobe on the outer side of last femur in many (all?) Archisotoma spp.; apical lobes on the inner side of Ant I–II in Halisotoma maritima ( Tullberg, 1871) .

The new species is recorded from a very exposed stretch of the Norwegian south coast. The beach at the type locality is composed of fine sand being exposed to strong wave action. Various amounts of marine algae are washed up and deposited on the foreshore which has a width of 20–50 metres in front of the aeolic dunes which rise 2–6 metres above the flat foreshore. The sand dunes have a dense vegetation of Ammophila arenaria which also form a pioneer community of scattered tufts in front of the dunes, in the upper part of the foreshore ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16 ). P. n o r ve g ic a was collected in these pioneer tufts and in partly buried scats of cow dung in the surrounding area.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF