Hexamatia seekhaow, Rivera-Quiroz & Petcharad & Miller, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2020.724.1157 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F8E5876F-1438-4055-9DB8-656969643176 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4328859 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EE8794-FFB4-FFC9-FDA3-FA55FCE71CC9 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hexamatia seekhaow |
status |
gen. et sp. nov. |
Hexamatia seekhaow View in CoL gen. et sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:1D1D0DE7-8A2A-4469-8867-666F9AD6EAEB
Diagnosis
Hexamatia seekhaow gen. et sp. nov. greatly resembles H. senaria gen. nov. but can be distinguished by the bifurcated PA and having a slightly shorter RTA with a blunter tip ( Figs 2f View Fig , 3 View Fig d–e; Zhang et al. 2011: figs 21a–d, 22). Another putative difference is the presence of denticles in the distal portion of the RTA; these are not mentioned nor illustrated for H. senaria gen. nov.
Etymology
The species epithet is a derivation of the Thai seekhaow (white); refers to the lack of color on the body of the holotype of this species.
Type material
Holotype
THAILAND • ♂; Chiang Mai Province, Doi Suthep National Park ; 18º48.502′ N, 98º53.528′ E; 1409 m a.s.l.; 24–28 Jul. 2018; Booppa Petcharad, Jeremy Miller and F. Andrés Rivera-Quiroz leg.; montane evergreen forest with pine; hand coll. among leaf litter; RMNH.ARA.18411 (four legs used for DNA extraction).
GoogleMapsDescription
Male holotype
Carapace yellowish-white, pale brown in cephalic region ( Fig. 2 View Fig b–c). Legs same color as carapace. Abdomen white without chevron pattern, oval, longer than wide ( Fig. 2 View Fig a–c). Six eyes in two triads,
AME absent ALE 0.04 mm, PME 0.02 mm, PLE 0.02 mm, ALE–ALE 0.02 mm, PME–PME 0.03 mm, PME–PLE contiguous ( Fig. 2d View Fig ). Chelicerae with three promarginal and two retromarginal teeth ( Fig. 3g View Fig ).Tracheal spiracle near middle of abdomen ( Fig. 2a View Fig ).
PALP. Pale brown, same color as cephalic region ( Fig. 2c View Fig ). CF darker, almost as long as RTA ( Figs 2 View Fig e–f, 3b), oval-shaped from ventral view ( Figs 2f View Fig , 3a View Fig ). Median apophysis narrow, elongate and transparent ( Fig. 3 View Fig a–b). Embolus filiform, black and long, originating retrollaterally and coiling clockwise around bulb ( Figs 2f View Fig , 3 View Fig a–b). RTA spur-like with dark rings. Patellar apophysis short and bifid, with the longer prong hook-shaped ( Fig. 3c View Fig ).
MEASUREMENTS (in mm). Total length 1.1, carapace 0.46 long, 0.33 wide; clypeus 0.01; chelicera 0.2 long, 0.1 wide; pedipalp 0.4 long; palp bulb 0.11 wide; leg I: femur 0.32, patella 0.13, tibia 0.26, metatarsus 0.22, tarsus 0.15; leg II: femur 0.31, patella 0.12, tibia 0.19, metatarsus 0.19, tarsus 0.15; leg III: femur 0.27, patella 0.08, tibia 0.16, metatarsus 0.17, tarsus 0.15; leg IV: femur 0.34, patella 0.11, tibia 0.22, metatarsus 0.21, tarsus 0.16; leg formula IV-I-II-III; abdomen 0.45 long, 0.34 wide.
Distribution
Known from the type locality, Doi Suthep National Park, Chiang Mai, Thailand ( Fig. 8 View Fig ).
Notes
See the Discussion for remarks on six-eyed species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.