Laccomimus malkini, Toledo, Mario & Michat, Mariano C., 2015
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3990.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:378C0359-E0E4-4CCC-821D-649144E37A63 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5692042 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EE87FE-FFF8-FFF8-91A6-FC31FC91A56B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Laccomimus malkini |
status |
sp. nov. |
Laccomimus malkini View in CoL sp. n.
( Figs 9 View FIGURES 8 – 13 ; 23; 37; 60; 71; 85; 108; 117; 123; 135)
Type locality. Colombia, Amazonas , Leticia.
Type material. Holotype male ( USNM): with genitalia dissected probably by Young; median lobe of aedeagus and parameres included in DMHF on plastic label pinned under the holotype “ Colombia, Amaz. [= Amazonas ], Leticia, III.12 –15.1969, P. & P. Spangler” [printed], “ HOLOTYPE Laccomimus malkini Toledo & Michat” [red, rectangular, printed label].
Paratypes (68 exs, all bearing red, printed label “ PARATYPE Laccomimus malkini Toledo & Michat”): Colombia: same data as holotype (28 exs USNM, MTP). Bolivia: “Beni, 40 km E San Borja, Estacion Biologica Beni, Estancia El Polvenir, 6–8.IX.1987, W.E. Steiner”, “At black light: open grass savanna and marsh” (2 exs USNM). Brazil: “Sao Paulo, Piracicaba, blacklight, 12.II.1966, C.A. Triplehorn” (4 exs USNM); “Para, Belem, 10. VII.1969, P. & P. Spangler” (1 ex. USNM). Ecuador: “Napo, Lago Agrio (2 km N), 26.IX.1975, Andrea Langley” (3 exs USNM); idem except for “ 16.VIII.1975, blacklight” (1 ex. USNM). Paraguay: “Jejuí-Mí, light trap, 19.XII.2003, leg. M.C. Michat” (5 exs MCMC); idem “ 20.XII.2003 ” (2 exs MCMC). Perú: “Madre de Dios, Rio Tambopata Res, 30 air km SW Pto-Maldonado, 290 m, 2–5.XI.1979, J.B. Heppner, subtropical moist forest” (8 exs USNM). Suriname: “Langaman, Kondre-Marowijne distr., 25.X.1963, Borys Malkin” (5 exs USNM); “Zanderijsavanne, 1st tributary of Colakreek, 55°14'W, 05°27'N, 4.IX.1969, leg N. Nieser (SN 114)” (1 ex. NMW); “Paramaribo, Guest House of Museum, at light, 20.VIII–23.IX.1969, leg N. Nieser” (2 exs NMW). Venezuela: “Guarico, 12 km S Calabozo, II.6 –12.1969, P. & P. Spangler” (3 exs USNM); idem “ 15 km S Calabozo, II.9 – 13.1969” (1 ex. USNM); “Bolivar State, 04°41.878'N, 61°04.246'W, 815 m, Gran Sabana, N Santa Elena, marshy area long Rt. 10, 17. VII.2010, leg. Short, Tellez & Camacho, VZ10-0717-03A” (4 exs VAIP – each specimen with additional label KUNHM-ENT, with its own barcode and catalogue number).
Diagnosis. Easily recognised by the combination of (usually) uniformly brown elytra and bright pale pronotum, along with male (scimitar-shaped outer foreclaw, characteristic bisinuate left paramere) and female (two-toothed gonocoxal blades) characters.
Description. Habitus ( Fig. 60 View FIGURES 59 – 66 ). TL: 2.0– 2.3 mm; MW: 1.0– 1.2 mm (holotype: TL: 2.05 mm; MW: 1.1 mm); A-TL: 2.1 mm; A-MW: 1.2 mm (NUM: 36 exs); almost regularly oval, gradually narrowed backward; elytral tip almost truncate. Glossy to almost dull; iridescence on elytra more or less visible.
Colour. Head chestnut brown, gradually paler on front and clypeus; pronotum testaceous, with darker band along hind margin. Elytra uniformly chestnut brown, rarely with more or less defined paler markings on subbasal and preapical position. Underside yellowish, at most slightly darkened on sutures. Antennae and mouthparts testaceous. Legs testaceous, metatarsi slightly darker.
Structures and sculpture. Head smooth, shiny, with quite impressed microreticulation of rounded cells. Pronotum shiny, often with slight iridescence. Few scattered punctures only along sides. Elytra with no or hardly visible subapical sinuation; shiny to almost dull, with iridescence of variable intensity; microreticulation quite impressed, accompanied by subtle scratches and scattered, poorly visible punctures. Prosternal process ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 20 – 25 ) rounded at tip, slightly elevated. Lobes of metacoxal processes regularly rounded in both sexes ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 32 – 37 ).
Male. Last abdominal ventrite tectiform, with antero-lateral sides visibly sinuate. Outer claw of forelegs scimitar-shaped ( Fig. 71 View FIGURES 67 – 83 ). Median lobe of aedeagus, in left lateral view ( Fig. 85 View FIGURES 84 – 87 a), slender; base and distal portion forming an angle of about 160°; distal portion straight, gradually narrowed to apex, ending in small button-like expansion, quite variable in shape. In dorsal view ( Fig. 108 View FIGURES 107 – 115 ) slender and acuminate, gradually tapering from base to tip; dorsal lamina strongly sinuate close to base; ejaculator groove narrow. Left paramere ( Fig. 85 View FIGURES 84 – 87 c) straight, visibly bi-sinuate on ventral side.
Female. Elytra and pronotum often slightly duller than in males. Last abdominal ventrite triangular, narrowly rounded at apex. Lateral tergites similar to L. distinctus : wide and sclerotized. Gonocoxal blades ( Fig. 117 View FIGURES 116 – 121 a) with second denticle at about distal 4/5. Ramus also distinctive ( Fig. 117 View FIGURES 116 – 121 b), with numerous densely distributed small teeth of uniform size.
Distribution. Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Perú, Suriname, Venezuela ( Fig. 123 View FIGURES 122 – 125 ).
Habitat. In Santa Elena ( Venezuela) some specimens were collected in a marshy area exposed to direct sunlight (Fig. 135).
Etymology. Name given in litteris by Frank N. Young and Paul J. Spangler, in honour of the collector Borys Malkin (cf. Young 1974: 2, 3). The specific epithet is a noun in the genitive case.
Notes on variability. Specimens from most localities have uniformly brown elytra. Paler markings, variably developed but never sharply defined, have been observed in most specimens from Paraguay. The few exemplars seen from Brazil (Piracicaba) share peculiar characters: larger size (TL: 2.4–2.5 mm; MW: 1.2–1.25 mm), more elongate body shape (with apical sinuation of elytra missing or almost so), pale patterns on the elytra well developed and clear ( Fig. 60 View FIGURES 59 – 66 b), and a button-like apical expansion of the median lobe projecting posteriorly into a small, acute process ( Fig. 85 View FIGURES 84 – 87 e). Such specimens might represent a distinct species, but at present this is difficult to determine due to the few available specimens.
Remarks. This species is close to L. pumilio and related species (see below), sharing with them a series of characters: scimitar-shaped male outer foreclaws, the lobes of the metacoxal processes rounded in both sexes, and the prosternal process broad and short, barely reaching the metaventrite. However, it is one of only two species, along with L. distinctus , that exhibits female gonocoxal blades with two teeth. The peculiar ramus, bearing dense, numerous and uniformly small teeth, is unique within the genus.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |